育龄期女性子宫内膜息肉切除中铥激光的应用
- 作者: Dobrokhotova Y.E.1, Lapina I.A.1,2, Allakhverdieva A.R.1,2, Kaykova O.V.2
-
隶属关系:
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
- Clinical Hospital № 2 “Medsi”
- 期: 卷 12, 编号 3 (2025)
- 页面: 326-334
- 栏目: Original study articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2313-8726/article/view/350245
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/aog677985
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NNMLYD
- ID: 350245
如何引用文章
详细
论证:子宫内膜息肉是常见的妇科疾病,在育龄期女性中的患病率为10%–24%,常导致不孕及月经紊乱。双极电切术是常用的治疗方法之一,但伴随明显疼痛和较长恢复期。铥激光作为一种更高效且疼痛更轻的方法,被认为是前景广阔的方向,并已在现代泌尿外科得到成功应用。
目的:评估铥激光在育龄期女性子宫内膜息肉切除中的有效性与安全性。
材料与方法:本研究共纳入46例子宫内膜息肉患者(每组各23例),比较了两种息肉切除方法:铥激光和双极电切术。考虑了手术时间、疼痛程度、月经恢复时间、复发率及可接受性等指标。
结果:结果显示,铥激光能够实现更短的手术时间(10.04±0.97 分钟 vs 13.86±1.2 分钟)、更轻的疼痛反应、更快的月经功能恢复(28.6±2.9 天 vs 34.65±3.06 天),以及更低的复发率(8.69% vs 17.39%)。术后1个月患者对铥激光治疗的可接受性更高(99.39% vs 92.39%)。
结论:结果表明,铥激光在子宫内膜息肉治疗中具有优势,同时有必要开展进一步研究以评估其长期效果。
作者简介
Yulia E. Dobrokhotova
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Email: Pr.Dobrohotova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7830-2290
SPIN 代码: 2925-9948
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor
俄罗斯联邦, 1 Ostrovityanov st, Moscow, 117997Irina A. Lapina
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; Clinical Hospital № 2 “Medsi”
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: doclapina@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2875-6307
SPIN 代码: 1713-6127
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)
俄罗斯联邦, 1 Ostrovityanov st, Moscow, 117997; MoscowAyshan R. Allakhverdieva
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; Clinical Hospital № 2 “Medsi”
Email: allakhverdievaayshan@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8693-5867
SPIN 代码: 3958-5660
俄罗斯联邦, 1 Ostrovityanov st, Moscow, 1179974; Moscow
Olesya V. Kaykova
Clinical Hospital № 2 “Medsi”
Email: kajkova.ov@medsigroup.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0007-3931-5762
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow
参考
- Clinical Guidelines “Endometrial Polyps” (approved by the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation). Russian Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Moscow, 2023. 32 p. (In Russ.) URL: http://disuria.ru/_ld/12/1289_kr23N84p0MZ.pdf
- Orazov MR, Khamoshina MB, Poimanova OF, et al. Clinical and anamnestic factors of recurrent endometrial polyps in fertile age. Clinical Review for General Practice. 2023;4(9):31–35. doi: 10.47407/kr2023.4.9.00305 EDN: FFVZCF
- Safronov OV, Kazachkova EA, Kazachkov EL, et al. Prevalence rate and structure of minimally invasive surgical intrauterine pathology in the light of pathomorphosis theory. Ural Medical Journal. 2020;(3):65–70. doi: 10.25694/URMJ.2020.03.38 EDN: UOFLIO
- Khusid JA, Khargi R, Seiden B, et al. Thulium fiber laser utilization in urological surgery: A narrative review. Investig Clin Urol. 2021;62(2):136–147. doi: 10.4111/icu.20200467
- Rice P, Somani BK. A systematic review of thulium fiber laser: applications and advantages of laser technology in the field of urology. Res Rep Urol. 2021;13:519–527. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S233979
- Noureldin YA, Kallidonis P, Liatsikos EN. Lasers for stone treatment: how safe are they? Curr Opin Urol. 2020;30(2):130–134. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000706
补充文件








