Ultrasound examination in the antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum
- Authors: Efimova V.A.1, Murashko A.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
- Issue: Vol 11, No 2 (2024)
- Pages: 125-136
- Section: Reviews
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2313-8726/article/view/260536
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/aog626559
- ID: 260536
Cite item
Abstract
The rise in cesarean section rates worldwide has greatly increased the rates of placenta accreta spectrum. Accurate diagnostics of placenta accreta spectrum before delivery is still difficult, as one-half to two-thirds of placenta accreta spectrum cases remain undiagnosed until delivery. Local and foreign studies reported the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography (US) as the most commonly used method for placenta accreta spectrum imaging because of its inexpensiveness, noninvasiveness, and swiftness. This review highlighted the possibilities of prenatal US diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum. Diagnostic accuracy may be reduced by the localization of the placenta in the posterior wall and a higher body mass index. US and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are highly specific and useful in diagnosing or ruling out placenta accreta spectrum. Unlike MRI, the accuracy of US depends on the qualification; therefore, single-center studies often overestimate the accuracy of US. More studies of the diagnostic methods for placenta accreta spectrum are needed for the selection of logical obstetric techniques for managing pregnant women with this pathology.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Viktoriya A. Efimova
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Email: efimova299@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7462-6928
student
Russian Federation, MoscowAndrei V. Murashko
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Author for correspondence.
Email: murashkoa@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0663-2909
MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- De Mucio B, Serruya S, Alemán A, Castellano G, Sosa CG. A systematic review and meta-analysis of cesarean delivery and other uterine surgery as risk factors for placenta accreta. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2019;147(3):281–291. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12948
- Silver RM, Branch DW. Placenta Accreta Spectrum. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(16):1529–1536. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1709324
- Jauniaux E, Bunce C, Grønbeck L, Langhoff-Roos J. Prevalence and main outcomes of placenta accreta spectrum: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221(3):208–218. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.01.233
- Thurn L, Lindqvist PG, Jakobsson M, et al. Abnormally invasive placenta-prevalence, risk factors and antenatal suspicion: results from a large population-based pregnancy cohort study in the Nordic countries. BJOG. 2016;123(8):1348–1355. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13547
- Fitzpatrick KE, Sellers S, Spark P, et al. Incidence and risk factors for placenta accreta/increta/percreta in the UK: a national case-control study. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52893. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052893
- Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, et al. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(6):1226–1232. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000219750.79480.84
- Jauniaux E, Grønbeck L, Bunce C, Langhoff-Roos J, Collins SL. Epidemiology of placenta previa accreta: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2019;9(11):e031193. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031193
- Donovan BM, Shainker SA. Placenta Accreta Spectrum. Neoreviews. 2021;22(11):e722–e733. doi: 10.1542/neo.22-11-e722
- Solheim KN, Esakoff TF, Little SE, et al. The effect of cesarean delivery rates on the future incidence of placenta previa, placenta accreta, and maternal mortality. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;24(11):1341–1346. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2011.553695
- Jauniaux E, Bhide A, Kennedy A, et al. FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum disorders: Prenatal diagnosis and screening. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018;140(3):274–280. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12408
- Zhong W, Zhu F, Li S, et al. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes After Planned or Emergency Delivery for Placenta Accreta Spectrum: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:731412. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.731412
- Comstock CH, Bronsteen RA. The antenatal diagnosis of placenta accrete. BJOG. 2014;121(2):171–181. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12557
- D’Antonio F, Iacovella C, Palacios-Jaraquemada J, et al. Prenatal identification of invasive placentation using magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;44(1):8–16. doi: 10.1002/uog.13327
- D’Antonio F, Iacovella C, Bhide A. Prenatal identification of invasive placentation using ultrasound: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42(5):509–517. doi: 10.1002/uog.13194
- Rac MW, Dashe JS, Wells CE, et al. Ultrasound predictors of placental invasion: the Placenta Accreta Index. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(3):343.e1–e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.10.022
- Alfirevic Z, Tang A-W, Collins SL, Robson SC, Palacios-Jaraquemada J; Ad-hoc International AIP Expert Group. Pro forma for ultrasound reporting in suspected abnormally invasive placenta (AIP): an international consensus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47(3):276–278. doi: 10.1002/uog.15810
- Collins SL, Ashcroft A, Braun T, et al.; European Working Group on Abnormally Invasive Placenta (EW-AIP). Proposal for standardized ultrasound descriptors of abnormally invasive placenta (AIP). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47(3):271–275. doi: 10.1002/uog.14952
- Palacios-Jaraquemada JM, Bruno CH, Martín E. MRI in the diagnosis and surgical management of abnormal placentation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92(4):392–397. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01527.x
- Pagani G, Cali G, Acharya G, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in detecting the severity of abnormally invasive placentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018;97(1):25–37. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13238
- Expert Panel on Women’s Imaging; Poder L, Weinstein S, Maturen KE, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorder. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020;17(5S):S207–S214. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.01.031
- Jauniaux E, Bhide A. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and outcome of placenta previa accreta after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(1):27–36. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.050
- De Oliveira Carniello M, Oliveira Brito LG, Sarian LO, Bennini JR. Diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum in high-risk women using ultrasonography or magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022;59(4):428–436. doi: 10.1002/uog.24861
- Chou MM, Tseng JJ, Ho ES. The application of three-dimensional color power Doppler ultrasound in the depiction of abnormal uteroplacental angioarchitecture in placenta previa percreta. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;19(6):625–627. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00731_2.x
- Lerner JP, Deane S, Timor-Tritsch IE. Characterization of placenta accreta using transvaginal sonography and color Doppler imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995;5(3):198–201. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1995.05030198.x
- Benacerraf BR, Shipp TD, Bromley B. Is a full bladder still necessary for pelvic sonography? J Ultrasound Med. 2000;19(4):237–241. doi: 10.7863/jum.2000.19.4.237
- Meng X, Xie L, Song W. Comparing the diagnostic value of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for placenta accreta: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013;39(11):1958–1965. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.05.017
- Latyshkevich OA, Kurtser MA, Savel’eva GM, et al. Antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta in women with a history of cesarean section. Voprosy ginekologii, akusherstva i perinatologii. 2013;12(6):36–41. (In Russ.) EDN: RUFXTF
- Garmazhapova AD, Preymak SV. Features of diagnosis and delivery of placenta accrete. In: The Medicine of Tomorrow. Proceedings of the XXI Interregional scientific and practical conference of students and young scientists with international participation. Chita, 2022 April 19–22. Chita: Chita State Medical Academy; 2022. P. 107–108. (In Russ.) EDN LCFIBI
- Preymak SV. Placenta accreta: features of diagnosis and delivery. In: The Medicine of Tomorrow. Proceedings of the XX Interregional scientific and practical conference of students and young scientists. Chita, 2021 April 20–23. Chita: Chita State Medical Academy; 2021. P. 84–85. (In Russ.) EDN GUFRWM
- Vishnevskaya DO, Kasymova DR, Galkina ON, Zhdanova VYu. Assessment of the placental site (ultrasound markers) in complete placenta previa for the purpose of diagnosing placenta accreta into the myometrium. In: National Projects: Challenges and Solutions. Proceedings of the 55th Interregional scientific and practical medical conference. Ulyanovsk: 2020 May 14–15. Ulyanovsk; 2020. P. 14–16. (In Russ.) EDN SNBBQN
- Petrov YuA, Shatalov AE, Kupina AD. Placenta regrowth: prediction and blood conservation. In: A Healthy Mother is a Healthy Offspring. Collection of materials of the intra-university scientific and practical conference. Rostov-on-Don, 2020 February 06. Rostov-on-Don; 2020. P. 343–350. (In Russ.) EDN IIDDXP
- Khasanov AA. Diagnosis, prevention and organ-preserving method of delivery in pregnant women with placenta accreta. Kazan Medical Journal. 2016;97(4):477–485. doi: 10.17750/KMJ2015-477
Supplementary files
