The Possibilities of Legal Leveling of Political, Organizational and Managerial Risks of Using Artificial Intelligence
- Authors: Kiselev A.S.1
-
Affiliations:
- Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
- Issue: Vol 29, No 2 (2025)
- Pages: 524-543
- Section: LAW AND DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2313-2337/article/view/327908
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2337-2025-29-2-524-543
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZNDTRO
- ID: 327908
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article examines the primary risks associated with the application of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies and legal measures to minimize these risks. It establishes that the use of AI technologies in the political sphere presents both potential for improved efficiency in governance and significant risks. The absence of human morality in artificial intelligence is emphasized, leading to ethical concerns regarding AI application, data privacy issues, the creation and spread of misinformation (for example, deepfakes), AI-driven discrimination, and unequal access to AI technologies. While a “strong AI” with cognitive abilities closely matching humans does not currently exist, recent trends suggest that society, governments, and even developers may not always foresee the negative consequences of emerging technologies. Therefore, proactive regulation is crucial to address key risks associated with the implementation of AI technologies. Proposed legal measures to minimize these risks include creating and enforcing new legal norms, establishing governmental and independent expert bodies to oversee AI and AI ethics, educating citizens (especially officials working with AI) on necessary skills and ethical considertations, and prioritizing transparency and openness in the application of these technologies. The article also emphasizes the need to consider international experience and develop international ethical and legal norms to reduce the risks associated with the proliferation AI technologies.
About the authors
Alexander S. Kiselev
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Author for correspondence.
Email: alskiselev@fa.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5044-4721
SPIN-code: 3570-8911
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Leading Researcher at the Center for Research and Expertise, Associate Professor of the Department of International and Public Law at the Faculty of Law of the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Deputy editor-in-chief of the Banking Law journal, Lawyer Publishing group
49 Leningradsky Prospekt str., Moscow, 125468, Russian FederationReferences
- Basheva, O. A. (2020) Digital activism as a new method of civil mobilization. Scientific result of Sociology and management. 6 (1), 41-57. (in Russian).
- Bertovsky, L.V. (2021) High-tech law: Understanding, genesis and prospects. RUDN Journal of Law. 25 (4), 735-749. (in Russian).
- Chernogor, N.N. (2022) Artificial intelligence and its role in the transformation of modern law. Journal of Russian Law. 26 (4), 5-15. (in Russian).
- Crawford, K. & Calo, R. (2016) There are gaps in artificial intelligence research. Nature. 538, 311-313.
- Gavrilova, Yu. A. (2021) The concept of integrating artificial intelligence into the legal system. RUDN Journal of Law. 25 (3), 673-692. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2337-2021-25-3-673-692
- Ilina, E.M. (2022) Politics and management in the Government of the Russian Federation: The political course of public administration. Ars Administrandi. 3, 403-421. (in Russian).
- Kazaryan, V.P. & Shutova, K.Yu. (2023) Ethical risks in the practice of artificial intelligence. Ideas and ideals. (2-2), 346-364. (in Russian).
- Kiselev, A.S. (2021) On the need for legal regulation in the field of artificial intelligence: Deepfake as a threat to national security. Bulletin of the Moscow State University. Series: Jurisprudence. (3), 54-64. (in Russian).
- Khabrieva, T. Ya. (2023) Technological imperatives of the modern world and law. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Jurisprudence. 19 (1), 5-12. (in Russian).
- Kozlov, S.E. (2020) Internet activism as a form of political participation in modern Russia. State administration Electronic Bulletin. (79), 154-169. https://doi.org/10.24411/2070-1381-2020-10053 (in Russian).
- Lemaikina, S.V. (2023) Problems of countering the use of deepfakes for prestigious purposes. Lawyer-Jurist. (2 (105)), 143-148. (in Russian).
- Lovink, G. (2019) Critical theory of the Internet. Moscow, Ad Marginem Publ. (in Russian).
- Novitsky, N.A. (2020) Issues of combining public administration in general, reducing investment risks in the development of digital systems with artificial intelligence. Eurasian Union of Scientists. (8-3 (77)), 48-54. (in Russian).
- Postarnak, A.M. (2023) Analysis of foreign legal regulation of deepfakes: The problem of intellectual integrity protection. Theory and practice of social development. (6 (182)), 269-273. (in Russian).
- Sorokova, E.D. (2022) Ethics of artificial intelligence in Russia and the European Union: Common in risk-oriented approaches. Discourse-Pi. (3), 157-169. (in Russian).
- Ren, Hu. (2022) Artificial intelligence and the legal system of the future: The right to access the electric energy of artificial intelligence. Open Journal of Social Sciences. 10 (12), 447-458.
- Volodenkov, S.V. & Fedorchenko, S.N. (2021) Digital infrastructures of civil and political activism: Current challenges, risks and limitations. Monitoring. 6, 97-118. (in Russian).
- Volodenkov, S.V. (2022) Politics in digital format in the research of Russian and foreign scientists: Introdusing the issue. RUDN Journal of Political Science. 24 (3), 339-350. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2022-24-3-339-350 (in Russian).
- Yastrebov, O.A. (2018) Artificial intelligence in the legal space. RUDN Journal of Law. 22 (3), 315-328. (in Russian).
- Yuste, R., Goering, S. et al. (2017) These four priorities for neurotechnology and artificial intelligence. Nature. 551 (7679), 159-163.
Supplementary files
