🔧На сайте запланированы технические работы
25.12.2025 в промежутке с 18:00 до 21:00 по Московскому времени (GMT+3) на сайте будут проводиться плановые технические работы. Возможны перебои с доступом к сайту. Приносим извинения за временные неудобства. Благодарим за понимание!
🔧Site maintenance is scheduled.
Scheduled maintenance will be performed on the site from 6:00 PM to 9:00 PM Moscow time (GMT+3) on December 25, 2025. Site access may be interrupted. We apologize for the inconvenience. Thank you for your understanding!

 

Strategies of Philosophical Pedagogy: Between Doctrinal Traditions and Dialogical Practice

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The traditional doctrinal methods of teaching philosophy face the challenge of a new paradigm that demands historical and cultural considerations in finding pedagogical strategies within the context of overall national needs. This study, therefore, aims to identify and evaluate the strategic model of philosophical pedagogy through a comparative analysis of the teaching practice of Philosophy in Russia and internationally. This study combines the conceptual-historical analysis method of the philosophy curriculum with typological research of the cross-cultural pedagogical model. This method is a case study of several Russian universities and international educational institutions, evaluating the practice of teaching philosophy in various universities. The syllabus archive, results of observations and interviews with philosophy educators, and a hermeneutic approach are employed to examine dialogue methods of teaching philosophy in the classroom. The main results of the research are presented in the form of a spectrum of hybrid pedagogical strategies that incorporate dialogically narrated philosophical thoughts, significantly shaping the philosophy culture among students. The main conclusion is that successful philosophical pedagogy demands an interaction between the depth of thought and dialogical openness, which can be adapted to the local educational culture. This research contributes the typology of philosophy teaching strategies for philosophy culture formation and the professional identity of philosophers in the education system.

About the authors

Andreas Yumarma

President University

Author for correspondence.
Email: andreasyumarma@president.ac.id
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0043-5971

Associate Professor, Doctor, Faculty of Business

Jl. Ki Hajar Dewantara, Kota Jababeka, Cikarang Baru, Bekasi, 17550, Indonesia

References

  1. Marinelli L, Bartoloni S, Pascucci F, Gregori GL, Farina Briamonte M. Genesis of an innovation-based entrepreneurial ecosystem: exploring the role of intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital. 2023;24(1):10-34. doi: 10.1108/JIC0920210264 EDN: ZJCJBG
  2. Chernykh VI. The Formation of a New Confucianism in the 1940s in the Framework of the Discussion of ‘Westernizers’ and Post-Confucians. RUDN Journal of Philosophy. 2022;26(1):166-177. (In Russian). doi: 10.22363/2313-2302-2022-26-1-166-177 EDN: QOZVOM
  3. Biesta G. World-centred education: A view for the present. New York: Routledge; 2021. doi: 10.4324/9781003098331
  4. Shen Y, Yang R. Bridging intellectual traditions through a bi/multi-cultural intellectual mind. Education Sciences. 2025;15(2):175. doi: 10.3390/educsci15020175 EDN: RXEODS
  5. Figueiredo FF. On the theoretical foundations of the ‘Philosophy for Children’ programme. Journal of Philosophy of Education. 2022;56(2):210-226. doi: 10.1111/14679752.12625 EDN: CQRVQC
  6. Pashby K, da Costa M, Stein S, Andreotti V. A meta-review of typologies of global citizenship education. Comparative Education. 2020;56(2):144-164. doi: 10.1080/03050068.2020.1723352 EDN: IXIBPC
  7. Connell R. Southern Theory: The global dynamics of knowledge in social science. London: Routledge; 2020. doi: 10.4324/9781003117346
  8. Knapp S, Aronson MFJ, Carpenter E, Herrera-Montes A, Jung K, Kotze DJ, et al. A research agenda for urban biodiversity in the global extinction crisis. BioScience. 2021;71(3):268-279. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biaa141 EDN: NZHGZZ
  9. Major ZB. Demeter, Márton: Academic knowledge production and the global south. Questioning Inequality and Under-representation. Palgrave Macmillan, 2020, 274 pp. KOME. 2021;9(2):81-83. doi: 10.17646/KOME.75672.65 EDN: LUVSTJ
  10. Park SM, Kim YG. A Metaverse: Taxonomy, Components, Applications, and Open Challenges. IEEE Access. 2022;10:4209-4251. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3140175 EDN: LKJLOP
  11. Cellary W, Walczak K. Challenges for higher education in the era of widespread access to Generative AI. Economic and Business Review. 2023;9(2):71-100. doi: 10.18559/ebr.2023.2
  12. Lundström C. Book Review: Raewyn Connell Southern Theory: The Global Dynamics of Knowledge in Social Science. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2007, 271 pp. Acta Sociologica. 2009;52(1):85-87. doi: 10.1177/0001699308100635
  13. Yeh Y-F, Chan KKH, Hsu Y-S. Toward a framework that connects individual TPACK and collective TPACK: A systematic review of TPACK studies investigating teacher collaborative discourse in the learning by design process. Computers & Education. 2021;171:104238. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104238 EDN: ISBDDG
  14. Fiock H. Designing a community of inquiry in online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2020;21(1):135-153. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.3985 EDN: OUDGSR
  15. Gleeson J, Doyle A, O’Neill N. Student learning outcomes in the Irish context: mixing curriculum paradigms, cultures, and design models. Irish Educational Studies. 2025:1-28. doi: 10.1080/03323315.2025.2483241
  16. Jons L. Calling and Responding: An Ethical-Existential Framework for Conceptualising Interactions ‘in-between’ Self and Other. Open Philosophy. 2024;7(1). doi: 10.1515/opphil20240034
  17. Delahunty T, Kimbell R. (Re)framing a philosophical and epistemological framework for teaching and learning in STEM: Emerging pedagogies for complexity. British Educational Research Journal. 2021;47(3):742-769. doi: 10.1002/berj.3706 EDN: JNZYQQ
  18. Class B. Teaching research methods in education: using the TPACK framework to reflect on praxis. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2024;47(3):288-308. doi: 10.1080/1743727X.2023.2270426
  19. Alexander RJ. Dialogic teaching and the study of classroom talk. 2020. P. 1-338.
  20. Buzzelli C, Johnston B. Authority, power, and morality in classroom discourse. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2001;17(8):873-884. doi: 10.1016/S0742051X(01)000373
  21. Kenklies K. Alienation: The foundation of transformative education. Journal of Philosophy of Education. 2022;56(4):577-592. doi: 10.1111/14679752.12703 EDN: WGQGLG
  22. Farini F, Scollan A. A critical comparison between democratic, neo-Vygotskian and dialogic pedagogies. Pedagogy, Culture & Society. 2025:1-22. doi: 10.1080/14681366.2025.2519933
  23. Kirzhaeva V, Maslova E. Fruitful Inspiration: Fresh view on Bakhtinian Dialogism in some fields of the humanities. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal. 2021;9:1-6. doi: 10.5195/dpj.2021.436 EDN: YAGKFY
  24. Hovakimyan H, Klimek M, Freyer B, Hayrapetyan R. Sustainable shift from centralized to participatory higher education in post-soviet countries: A systematic literature review. Sustainability. 2021;13(10). doi: 10.3390/su13105536 EDN: VYDBAB
  25. Rymes B. Classroom Discourse Analysis. New York: Routledge; 2015. doi: 10.4324/9781315775630
  26. Soye E. I and Thou? Challenges to dialogical pedagogy in a diverse London secondary school. British Educational Research Journal. 2024;50(1):183-199. doi: 10.1002/berj.3919 EDN: ILEWAP
  27. Niemi K. ‘The best guess for the future?’ Teachers’ adaptation to open and flexible learning environments in Finland. Education Inquiry. 2021;12(3):282-300. doi: 10.1080/20004508.2020.1816371 EDN: LJMDRV
  28. Majola E, Geduld D, Rangana N. Critical pedagogy in context: problematising the application of Paulo Freire’s framework in TVET education in South Africa. International Journal of Training Research. 2025:1-16. doi: 10.1080/14480220.2025.2531215
  29. Mukhametzyanova FG, Morozov AV, Khayrutdinov RR, Fedorchuk YM, Aminova RR. Modern development strategy of russian education. International Journal of Higher Education. 2020;9(8):72-78. doi: 10.5430/ijhe.v9n8p72 EDN: XNMVYZ
  30. Kazarinova DB, Taisheva VB. Perceptions of Russia in the global world. Russian Journal of Global Affairs. 2019;17(4):20-52. doi: 10.31278/1810637420191742052
  31. Bykova TP, Forster MF, Steiner MN, editors. Handbook of Russian Thought. Cham: Springer; 2021. doi: 10.1590/21764573e58581
  32. Narkulov SD, Karimov NR, Makhmudov LY, Alimova RR, Otaev GG, Siddikov R, et al. The formation of national pride in the people of Central Asia: An academic perspective. Journal of Law, Social Justice and Global Development. 2023;11(12):e2519. doi: 10.55908/sdgs.v11i12.2519
  33. Harry A, Sayudin S. Role of AI in education. Interdisciplinary Journal of Humanities. 2023;2(3):260-268. doi: 10.58631/injurity.v2i3.52 EDN: GQFLIT
  34. Sumadisastro W, Robandi B, Fahrizal D, Mansor NS. Research trends in philosophy of science in education: A bibliometric study of the recent period. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research. 2025;6(2):327-340. doi: 10.46843/jiecr.v6i2.2206
  35. Evans C, Rees G, Taylor C, Fox S. A liberal higher education for all? The massification of higher education and its implications for graduates’ participation in civil society. Higher Education. 2021;81(3):521-535. doi: 10.1007/s1073402000554x EDN: VWPBLU
  36. Ruge G, Schönwetter DJ, McCormack C, Kennelly R. Teaching philosophies revalued: beyond personal development to academic and institutional capacity building. International Journal for Academic Development. 2023;28(1):59-73. doi: 10.1080/1360144X.2021.1963735 EDN: EUGFTA
  37. Jäger C, Shackel N. Testimonial Authority and Knowledge Transmission. Social Epistemology. 2025;39(6):1-16. doi: 10.1080/02691728.2025.2449608
  38. King R, Lee J, Marginson S, Naidoo R. Palgrave Studies in Global Higher Education: 25 Years of Transformations of Higher Education Systems in Post-Soviet Countries: Reform and Continuity. 2018. Available from: http://www.palgrave.com/gp/series/14624 (accessed: 20.07.2025).
  39. Argus-Calvo B, Clegg DJ, Francis MD, Dwivedi AK, Carrola PA, Leiner M. A holistic approach to sustain and support lifelong practices of wellness among healthcare professionals: generating preliminary solid steps towards a culture of wellness. BMC Medical Education. 2024;24(1):1364. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06353-7 EDN: FAQLJU
  40. Yudkevich M. International students in Soviet and Russian universities: a critical analysis of changing rationales 1950s-2025. Comparative Education. 2025;68:1-18. doi: 10.1080/03050068.2025.2515682
  41. Mucinskas D, Clark S, Barendsen L, Gardner H. An increase in educator expectations of student character growth during participation in a community of practice. Frontiers in Education. 2025;10:1-17. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1466295 EDN: VMKNWM
  42. Pellicelli AC. Challenges and risks of AI in education. In: EDULEARN24 Proceedings. 2024. P. 7527-7530. doi: 10.21125/edulearn.2024.1767
  43. Milošević D, Maksimović J. Methodology of comparative research in education: Role and significance. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education. 2020;8(3):155-162. doi: 10.23947/23348496202083155162 EDN: ZLBLCR
  44. Beregovaya O. Philosophical comparative studies and comparative philosophy of education. Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Theory & Practice. 2016;(9):17-19. (In Russian).
  45. Schuman BF. What does success in online teaching look like? Teaching Philosophy. 2021;44(3):339-367. doi: 10.5840/teachphil202132140 EDN: HZXWIH
  46. Taff SD. A framework for creating and using teaching philosophy statements to guide reflective and inclusive instruction. Journal of Occupational Therapy Education. 2023;7(3). doi: 10.26681/jote.2023.070308 EDN: QJBMCV
  47. Bedenlier S, Bond M, Buntins K, Zawacki-Richter O, Kerres M. Facilitating student engagement through educational technology in higher education: A systematic review in the field of arts and humanities. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 2020;36(4):126-150. doi: 10.14742/ajet.5477 EDN: RJPAIW
  48. Syahriani I, Supriadi S, Mustafa M, Saifullah AR, Riski H, Mubarok YM. Power dynamics in a classroom interactions context: Critical discourse analysis. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language. 2024;12(3):65-79. doi: 10.22034/ijscl.2024.2037993.3632
  49. Crawford R. Responding to the de-professionalisation of teaching: Empowering teachers to enhance their pedagogy through action research. Education Sciences. 2025;15(3):274. doi: 10.3390/educsci15030274 EDN: WOQFFM
  50. Stillwagon J. Performing for the students: Teaching identity and the pedagogical relationship. Journal of Philosophy of Education. 2008;42(1):67-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9752.2008.00603.x
  51. Semiāo D, Mogarro MJ, Pinto FB, Martins MJD, Santos N, Sousa O, et al. Teachers’ perspectives on students’ cultural diversity: A systematic literature review. Education Sciences. 2023;13(12):1215. doi: 10.3390/educsci13121215 EDN: XGXPXM
  52. Marliana NL, Jaafar MF, Radzi HB. Penanda pengemukaan topik dalam wacana pedagogi: Satu analisis wacana kritis (Topic delivery markers in pedagogical discourse based on critical discourse analysis). GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies. 2023;23(2):75-93. doi: 10.17576/gema2023230205 EDN: IYESBI
  53. Matta C. Philosophical paradigms in qualitative research methods education: What is their pedagogical role? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. 2022;66(6):1049-1062. doi: 10.1080/00313831.2021.1958372 EDN: XUDWPP
  54. Poucher ZA. Thinking through and designing qualitative research studies: a focused mapping review of 30 years of qualitative research in sport psychology. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2020;13(1):163-186. doi: 10.1080/1750984X.2019.1656276
  55. Scholl R. ‘Inside-out pedagogy’: theorising pedagogical transformation through teaching philosophy. Australian Journal of Teacher Education. 2014;39(6). doi: 10.14221/ajte.2014v39n6.5
  56. Eradze M, Rodríguez-Triana MJ, Laanpere M. A Conversation between learning design and classroom observations: A systematic literature review. Education Sciences. 2019;9(2):91. doi: 10.3390/educsci9020091
  57. Green JK, Burrow MS, Carvalho L. Designing for transition: Supporting teachers and students cope with emergency remote education. Postdigital Science and Education. 2020;2(3):906-922. doi: 10.1007/s42438020001856 EDN: OCRMKL
  58. Pinho C, Franco M, Mendes L. Application of innovation diffusion theory to the E-learning process: higher education context. Education and Information Technologies. 2021;26(1):421-440. doi: 10.1007/s10639020102692 EDN: GJIXNI
  59. Troussas C, Krouska A, Sgouropoulou C. A Novel Teaching Strategy Through Adaptive Learning Activities for Computer Programming. IEEE Transactions on Education. 2021;64(2):103-109. doi: 10.1109/TE.2020.3012744 EDN: MSSSYY
  60. Kerimbayev N, Umirzakova Z, Shadiev R, Jotsov V. A student-centered approach using modern technologies in distance learning: a systematic review of the literature. Smart Learning Environments. 2023;10(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s40561023002808 EDN: BVBASP
  61. Delorme CdB. Socrates’ dialectic therapy according to Plato’s aporetic dialogues. Filozofia. 2019;74(3):169-180. doi: 10.31577/filozofia.2019.74.3.1 EDN: VGXPBM
  62. Ludwig D. Reimagining epistemology and philosophy of science from a global perspective. London; New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group; 2022.
  63. Fariani RI, Junus K, Santoso HB. A systematic literature review on personalised learning in the higher education context. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. 2023;28(2):449-476. doi: 10.1007/s10758022096284 EDN: NSRCBW
  64. Nortvedt GA et al. Aiding culturally responsive assessment in schools in a globalising world. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability. 2020;32(1):5-27. doi: 10.1007/s1109202009316w
  65. Santiago A, Mattos C. From classroom education to remote emergency education: transformations in a dialogical pedagogy proposal. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal. 2023;11(1):1-21. doi: 10.5195/dpj.2023.462 EDN: UCSWAQ
  66. Laverty SM. Hermeneutic Phenomenology and Phenomenology: A Comparison of Historical and Methodological Considerations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2003;2(3):21-35. doi: 10.1177/160940690300200303
  67. Rui Z. Research on evaluation system of ideological and political education of college students based on decision system. Soft Computing. 2022;26(20):10805-10812. doi: 10.1007/s00500022070030 EDN: WIQMLX

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».