Historical and Biographical Prerequisites of the Criminal-Legal Paradigm of J. Locke
- Authors: Bochkarev S.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- The Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
- Issue: Vol 29, No 4 (2025): IN SEARCH OF A STRATEGY FOR TEACHING PHILOSOPHY: RUSSIAN AND WORLD EXPERIENCE
- Pages: 1223-1237
- Section: HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2313-2302/article/view/362055
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2025-29-4-1223-1237
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/JLWGQE
- ID: 362055
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
In historical, philosophical and legal scientific studies considerable attention is paid to the political and normative doctrine of J. Locke and, to a lesser extent, his criminal-legal views. At the same time, in both cases, the focus is shifted to the content of the author’s manuscripts without the context of personal development in a specific social environment and in isolation from the plays he occupies in the system of historical and biographical coordinates. In this regard, the objectives of this article: 1) to analyze the factors that contributed to the ontogenesis of J. Locke’s fundamental ideas, 2) to demonstrate the inseparable connection of the philosopher’s general criminal worldviews with his natural-humanitarian reception, 3) to identify the stages of transformation of his beliefs taking into account significant public events. To achieve these goals, scientific theoretical (historical, hypothetical, generalization) and logical (analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction) methods are used. The archival materials, works of foreign scientists on the study of English legislation and key milestones of the Enlightenment, medical records and essays by J. Locke, representatives of the school of naturalists and theologians were used.
About the authors
Sergey A. Bochkarev
The Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Author for correspondence.
Email: bo4karvs@yandex.ru
SPIN-code: 9962-3002
PhD in Law, Chief Researcher 10 Znamenka, Moscow, 119019, Russian Federation
References
- Walmsley J. Morbus-Locke’s Early Essay оn Disease. Early Science and Medicine. 2000;5(4):367-393. doi: 10.1163/157338200x00353
- Walmsley JC, Milton JR. Locke’s Notebook “Adversaria 4” and His Early Training in Chemistry. The Lock Newsletter. 1999;30:85-101.
- Dunn J. The political thought of John Locke: an historical account of the argument of the “Two treatises of government”. London: Cambridge University Press; 1969.
- Dewhurst K. John Locke, 1632-1704, Physician and Philosopher: A Medical Biography with an Edition of the Medical Notes in his Journals (Publications of the Wellcome Historical Medical Library, New Ser 2). London: Wellcome Historical Medical Library; 1963.
- Romanell P. John Locke and Medicine: A New Key to Locke. Buffalo, New York: Prometheus Books; 1984.
- Anstey P. The Creation of the English Hippocrates. Medical History. 2011;55(4):457-478. doi: 10.1017/s0025727300004944
- Anstey P. John Locke and Natural Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.
- Anstey P. Further Reflections on Locke’s Medical Remains. Locke Studies. 2015;15:215-242. doi: 10.5206/Is.2015.696
- Anstey PR, Burrows J. John Locke, Thomas Sydenham, and the Authorship of Two Medical Essays. Electronic British Library Journal. 2009;3:1-42.
- Wilkins J. In A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature, by John William Cousin. London: J.M. Dent & Sons; 1910.
- McGrath Al. A Scientific Theology Volume 1: Nature. Theology Today. 2001;59(2):312-318. doi: 10.1177/004057360205900226
- Robertson J. The Philosophical Works of Francis Bacon. London: George Routledge and Sons Ltd; 1905.
- Sydenham T. Observationes medicae morborum acutorum historiam et curationem. London: G. Kettilby; 1676.
- Meynell G. Sydenham, Locke and Sydenham’s De peste sive febre pestilentiali. Medical History. 1993;37(3):330-332. doi: 10.1017/s0025727300058488
- Meynell G. Locke, Boyle and Peter Stahl. Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London. 1995;49(2):185-192. doi: 10.1098/rsnr.1995.0022
- Locke J. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Nidditch PH, editor. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1979.
- Scarburgh Sir C. A practical method as used for the cure of the plague in London, in 1665. With some remarks upon the present plague in France. London: Printed for B. Lintot, at the Crofs-Keys between the Temple-Gates, in Fleet Street; 1722.
- Ent G. Apologia pro circuitione sanguinis: Qua respondetur Aemilio Parisano Medico Veneto. London: Proquest, Eebo Editions; 1641.
- Cranston М. John Locke and the Case for Toleration. John Locke: A Letter concerning Toleration in Focus. London; New York: Routledge; 1991.
- Parry G. John Locke. New York: Routledge; 1978.
- Dunn J. The Political Thought of John Locke: An Historical Account of the Argument of the “Two Treatises of Government”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1969.
- Lloyd T. Locke on Government. London; New York: Routledge; 1995.
- Haley KHD. The First Earl of Shaftesbury. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1968.
- Kenyon JP. Stuart England. London: Penguin Books; 1978.
- Dmitrievsky NP. Legislation of the English Revolution of 1640-1660. Moscow; Leningrad: AN USSR publ.; 1946. (In Russian).
- Cheyney Ed. The Court of Star Chamber. The American Historical Review. 1913;18(4):727-750. doi: 10.2307/1834768
- Usher R. The rise and fall of the High Commission. Oxford: Clarendon P.; 1913.
- Ollard S. Dictionary of English Church History. London: A.R. Mowbray; Milwau-kee, The Young churchman; 1948.
- Gardiner S. Reports of cases in the courts of Star Chamber and High Commission. Westminster: Printed for the Camden Society; 1886.
- Ashcraft R. Revolutionary Politics and Locke’s Two Treatises of Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1986.
Supplementary files

