Illocutionary Acts in EFL Teaching: Balancing Authority and Engagement

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

This study investigates illocutionary acts in the context of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) education, focusing on their types and functions. The research centers on an EFL teacher as the subject and employs conversation analysis as the methodological approach. The primary aim is to explore how teachers utilize illocutionary acts to influence language learning experiences. The findings underscore the inherent authority of teachers in shaping classroom discourse and instructional interactions. Specifically, the study reveals that teachers predominantly exert influence through assertive acts, utilizing these to convey information effectively and provide instructional guidance. However, in an ideal classroom environment, there exists a harmonious balance of authority where teachers maintain instructional leadership while also empowering students to actively participate in their learning process. This balance fosters a collaborative atmosphere conducive to effective communication, mutual respect, and meaningful engagement in educational activities.

About the authors

Hieronimus Canggung Darong

Universitas Katolik Indonesia Santu Paulus

Author for correspondence.
Email: hieronimusdarong@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0050-0040
Scopus Author ID: 57214988933

Associate Professor

10, Jln. Ahmad Yani, Ruteng, Manggarai, Flores, Indonesia, 86518

References

  1. Darong, H.C. & Neldis, N. (2023). Investigating Illocutionary Acts in Video Podcasts and Its Pedagogical Implication in EFL Teaching. Interdisciplinary Journal of Education Research, 5 (June), 48-60. https://doi.org/10.38140/ijer-2023.vol5.05
  2. Oktaviani, A.D. & Alam, O.S.N. (2022). Illocutionary Speech Acts and Types of Hate Speech in Comments on @ Indraakenz’s Twitter Account. The Second International Conference on Communication, Language, Literature and Culture, 6(1), 91-99. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijsascs.v6i1.69943
  3. Putra, I.P.W.A. & Sedeng, I.N. (2022). Directive Illocutionary Acts Found in the Movies 21 and 22 Jump Street. Humanis: Journal of Arts and Humanities, 26(2), 180-187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24843/JH.20 22.v26.i.02.p03
  4. Alhaded, H.H., Glushchenko, T.N. & Alhadid, H.H. (2022). Evaluative Language in Arabic Academic Discourse. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 13(1), 68-79. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2022-13-1-68-79
  5. Cancino, M. (2015). Assessing Learning Opportunities in EFL Classroom Interaction : What Can Conversation Analysis Tell Us ? RELC Journal, 46(2), 115-129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688214568109
  6. Bardovi-harlig, K., Mossman, S. & Su, Y. (2017). The effect of corpus-based instruction on pragmatic routines. Language Learning & Technology, 21(3), 76-103.
  7. Taguchi, N., Xiao, F. & Li, S. (2016). Effects of Intercultural Competence and Social Contact on Speech Act Production in a Chinese Study Abroad Context. The Modern Language Journa, 100(4), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12349
  8. Ziashahabi, S., Jabbari, A.A. & Razmi, M.H. (2020). The Effect of Interventionist Instructions of English Conversational Implicatures on Iranian EFL Intermediate Level Learners’ Pragmatic Competence Development. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/233118 6X.2020.1840008
  9. Darong, H.C. & Guna, S. (2023). Corrective feedback : Pragmatic exposures in EFL classroom interactions. International Journal of Education and Learning, 5(1), 14-22. https://doi.org/10.31763/ijele.v5i1.820
  10. Bahing, Emzir & Rafli, Z. (2018). English Speech Acts of Illocutionary Force in Class Interaction. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(3), 113-119. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.3p.113
  11. Tanduk, R. (2023). Pragmatic Aspects of Speech Acts: a Cross-Linguistic Perspective. English Review: Journal of English Education, 11(3), 881-890. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v11i3.8762
  12. Zulkiana, K., Iskandar & Abdullah. (2023). Illocutionary Acts in F. Scott Fitzgerald ’s Short Stories. Eliterate: Journal of English Linguistics and Literature Studies, 3(2), 14-26. https://ojs.unm.ac.id/Eliterate/article/view/46381
  13. Austin, J.L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  14. Bach, K. & Harnish, R. (1979). Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  15. Azhari, A.S. & Priono, Nuriadi (2018). Speech Acts of Classroom Interaction. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 4(2), 24-45. URL: https://sloap.org/journals/index.php/ijllc/ (accessed: 15.08.2022).
  16. Sumedi, S.H. & Rovino, D. (2020). Speech Act Analysis of English Teacher Talk at SMP Negeri 1 Rangkasbitung. Journal of English Language and Culture, 10(2), 121-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.30813/jelc.v10i2.2142
  17. Denisenko, V.N., Yergazy, N. & Rybakov, M. (2023). Language Means of Expressing Politeness in the Context of Russian Business Communication. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 14(3), 575-594. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2023-14-3-575-594
  18. Brown, E., Smith, R., & Johnson, K. (2022). The role of genre and topic in illocutionary acts in video podcasts. Journal of Discourse Analysis, 40(4), 567-582.
  19. Babaii, E., Parsazadeh, A. & Moradi, H. (2018). The question of power in language classes from a critical discourse analysis perspective Once a student, always a student ? Pragmatics and Society, 8(4), 542-570. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.8.4.04bab
  20. Cantone, K.F. (2022). Language exposure in early bilingual and trilingual acquisition. International Journal of Multilingualism, 19(3), 402-417. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2019.1703995
  21. Darong, H.C. (2022). Form and Function of Teacher’s Questioning Technique in English Foreign Language Classroom Interactions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Education Research, 4(2015), 87-95. https://doi.org/10.38140/ijer-2022.vol4.07
  22. Solem, M.S. (2016). Negotiating knowledge claims : Students’ assertions in classroom interactions. Discourse Studies, 18(6), 737-757. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445616668072
  23. Whayuni, M., Arifin, M.B., & Lubis, I.S. (2019). An analysis of flouting maxims in La La Land movie. Literary Criticism Journal, 3(3), 384-392. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30872/ jbssb.v3i3.2212
  24. Iliadi, P.L. & Larina, T.A. (2017) Refusal Strategies in English and Russian. RUDN Journal of Lan-guage Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 8(3), 531-542. doi: 10.22363/2313-2299-2017-8-3-531-542.
  25. Darong, H.C., Kadarisman, A.E. & Basthomi, Y. (2020). Teachers’ Politeness Markers in Request in Classroom Interactions. NOBEL: Journal of Literature and Language Teaching, 11(2), 217-233. https://doi.org/10.15642/nobel.2020.11.2.217-233
  26. Strelchuk, E.N. & Lepkova, A.S. (2024). Conceptualization of the Notion of Freedom in the Worldview of Foreign Students of Journalism. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 15(1), 92-106. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2024-15-1-92-106
  27. Klimova, I.I. & Kozlovtseva, N.A. (2023). Language as an Instrument of Social Control and People Management. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 14(2), 402-417. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2023-14-2-402-417
  28. Bakhtikireeva, U.M. & Valikova, O.A. (2022). “Language Keys”: Foreign Cultural Lexicon in the Translingual (Russophonic) Literary Text. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 13(1), 184-200. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2022-13-1-184-200

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).