The privacy paradox: Why privacy concerned users disclose personal data


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The loss of privacy is one of the most powerful challenges associated with the Internet media. Information privacy is an important topic of empirical and theoretical research mostly focused on the level of information privacy concerns. Regular monitoring of public opinion on this sensitive issue revealed the “privacy paradox”: Internet users express concern about information privacy and report a desire to protect their data but disclose personal data for a small reward and rarely make efforts to protect their privacy. The privacy paradox is widely considered in Englishlanguage works, while in Russia, there are only a few studies and no complete overview of the current relevant theoretical explanations of the paradox. The article aims at presenting the most popular and widespread theoretical explanations of the privacy paradox. Based on the conceptual, comparative and integrative analysis of empirical, theoretical and review articles in English, the article identifies the following relevant ways for explaining the privacy paradox: the theory of privacy calculus, the theory of decision biases and bounded rationality, the model of social influence and exchange, the privacy paradox as a methodological artefact, the privacy cynicism and digital resignation. The very existence of several strategies for explaining the paradox of privacy suggests that it has not yet received a final solution. The most promising direction seems to be integration of the above-mentioned explanatory models and contextualization of general theories in relation to specific cases.

About the authors

E. G. Tsurkan

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: unigendeth@gmail.com
кандидат философских наук, старший преподаватель кафедрs социальной философии и философии истории Lomonosovsky Prosp., 27-4, Moscow, 119991, Russia

References

  1. Nazarov M.M. Massovaya kommunikatsiya kak faktor izmeneniya granits publichnogo i chastnogo [Mass communication as a factor in changing the boundaries of public and private]. Sotsialno-Gumanitarnye Znaniya. 2021; 1. (In Russ.).
  2. Pronkina E.S. Paradoks privatnosti: pochemu polzovateli sotsialnyh media raskryvayut personalnuyu informatsiyu v publichnom prostranstve [The privacy paradox: Why users of social media disclose personal information in public space]. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya: Istoriya. Filologiya. Kulturologiya. Vostokovedenie. 2018; 8. (In Russ.).
  3. Solovkin S.V. Znachenie paradoksa privatnosti dlya zakonodatelstva o personalnyh dannyh v usloviyah stanovleniya obshchestva nablyudeniya [Significance of the privacy paradox for personal data legislation in the surveillance society]. Vestnik Universiteta im. O.E. Kutafina. 2022; 4. (In Russ.).
  4. Tsurkan E.G. Vliyanie internet-tekhnologiy na transformatsiyu razlicheniya pub-lichnogo i privatnogo [The influence of the Internet technologies on the transformation of the distinction between public and private]. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 7: Filosofiya. 2021; 4. (In Russ.).
  5. Chesnokova L.V. Razmyvanie granitsy mezhdu publichnostiyu i privatnostiyu v sotsialnyh setyah i paradoks privatnosti [Blurring the line between publicity and privacy on the social media and the privacy paradox]. Filosofskie Problemy Informatsionnyh Tekhnologiy i Kiberprostranstva. 2021; 2. (In Russ.).
  6. Acquisti A., Brandimarte L., Loewenstein G. Secrets and likes: The drive for privacy and the difficulty of achieving it in the digital age. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 2020; 30 (4).
  7. Barnes S.B. A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States. URL: http://firstmonday.org/article/view/1394/1312.
  8. Bartol J., Vehovar V., Petrovcic A. Should we be concerned about how information privacy concerns are measured in online contexts? A systematic review of survey scale development studies. Informatics. 2021; 8 (2).
  9. Brandimarte L., Acquisti A., Loewenstein G. Misplaced confidences: Privacy and the control paradox. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 2013; 4 (3).
  10. Dienlin T. Privacy calculus: Theories, studies, and new perspectives. Routledge Handbook of Privacy and Social Media. London; 2023.
  11. Flender C., Müller G. Type indeterminacy in privacy decisions: The privacy paradox revised. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Quantum Interaction; 2012.
  12. Gerber N., Gerber P., Volkamer M. Explaining the privacy paradox: A systematic review of literature investigating privacy attitude and behavior. Computers & Security. 2018; 77 (1).
  13. Gonçalves R.B., Bastos de Figueiredo J.C. Privacy paradox: Integrative literature review. Revista de Administração de Empresas. 2025; 65 (2).
  14. Hoffmann C.P., Lutz C., Ranzini G. Privacy cynicism: A new approach to the privacy paradox. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace. 2016; 10 (4).
  15. Kokolakis S. Privacy attitudes and privacy behavior: A review of current research on the privacy paradox phenomenon. Computers & Security. 2017; 64.
  16. Lee N., Kwon O. A privacy-aware feature selection method for solving the personalization-privacy paradox in mobile wellness healthcare services. Expert Systems with Applications. 2015; 42 (5).
  17. Molitorisz S. Net Privacy: How We Can Be Free in an Age of Surveillance. Montreal; 2020.
  18. Norberg P.A., Horne D.R., Horne D.A. The privacy paradox: Personal information disclosure intentions versus behaviors. Journal of Consumer Affairs. 2007; 41 (1).
  19. Obar J.A., Oeldorf-Hirsch A. The biggest lie on the Internet: Ignoring the privacy policies and terms of service policies of social networking services. Information, Communication & Society. 2018; 23 (1).
  20. Ranzini G., Lutz C., Hoffmann C.P. Privacy cynicism: Resignation in the face of agency constraints. Routledge Handbook of Privacy and Social Media. London; 2023.
  21. Richards N. Why Privacy Matters. Oxford University Press; 2022.
  22. Skinner-Thompson S. Privacy at the Margins. Cambridge University Press; 2020.
  23. Taddicken M. The ‘privacy paradox’ in the social web: The impact of privacy concerns, individual characteristics, and the perceived social relevance on different forms of self-disclosure. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication. 2014; 19 (2).
  24. Véliz С. Privacy is Power: Why and How you Should Take Back Control of Your Data. London; 2020.
  25. Zuboff S. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. Profile Books, 2019.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).