Cognitive Factors of Life Satisfaction among the Russian Elderly

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The overall aim of this article was to examine factors related to life satisfaction in old age. There are several approaches to understanding life satisfaction in psychology. Some theories that emphasize objective circumstances as most influential for life satisfaction are commonly labelled bottom-up theories, whereas theories that focus on stable individual characteristics are commonly labelled top-down theories. It is argued that certain personality traits, in particular extraversion and neuroticism, partly determine a person’s satisfaction with life. At the same time, cognitive factors related to life satisfaction are rarely the subject of empirical research. In this study, age, social status (works, does not work, in retirement), type of family (nuclear or extended), and a number of indices of cognitive functioning (cognitive flexibility, memory - short-term and long-term, creativity and thinking) were used as predictor variables of life satisfaction. Ninety-seven respondents aged 50-84 participated in the research, which finds that, along with non-cognitive factors of life satisfaction, cognitive factors play great roles as well. Based on the data obtained, an empirical model of cognitive factors of life satisfaction was constructed. This research demonstrates that all cognitive variables examined (flexibility of thinking, long-term memory, short-term memory, thinking and creativity) make positive contributions to increasing satisfaction; notably the roles of long-term memory and creativity are especially salient. This study also found satisfaction is significantly higher among working older respondents when compared with their non-working colleagues, with the oldest employees the most satisfied. Family status is a factor related to life satisfaction in old age as well, since old people who live with a spouse are more satisfied than those who live in extended families with children and grandchildren. A regression model combined variables from top-down and bottom-up theories. The model includes memory and age as personal characteristics, and family type as a circumstantial predictor for life satisfaction in old age.

About the authors

Elena V. Belovol

Moscow State Pedagogical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: belovol@mail.ru

Ph.D. in Psychology, is Professor of the Department of Psychology of Personality Development

1 Malaya Pirogovskaya St, bldg 1. Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation

Zlata V. Boyko

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)

Email: boikozv@yandex.ru

Ph.D. in Psychology, is Associate Professor at Department of Management of Nursing Activities of Institute of Medicine

6 Miklukho-Maklaya St, Moscow, 117198, Russian Federation

Elena Yu. Shurupova

Psychological-and-Pedagogical Centre for Children and Adolescents “Merry Steps”

Email: shurupovaelena@mail.ru

Ph.D. in Psychology, is psychologist

16 Vadkovskii Lane, Moscow, 127055, Russian Federation

References

  1. An, J.S., & Cooney, T.M. (2006). Psychological well-being in mid to late life: The role of generativity development and parent-child relationships across the lifespan. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30, 410-421
  2. Belovol, E.V., Boyko, Z.V., & Shurupova, E.Yu. (2015). Obuchenie litc “tret'ego vozrasta” kak sposob preduprezhdeniya kognitivnogo stareniya. Gorizonty zrelosti: Conference Proceedings (pp. 537-540). Moscow: MGPPU Publ. (In Russ.)
  3. Belovol, E.V., Boyko, Z.V., Radysh, I.V., & Shurupova, E.Yu. (2015). Life quality increasing and dynamics of cognitive processes as the result of education in the “third age”. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, (4), 77-84. (In Russ.)
  4. Berg, A.I., Hoffman, L., Hassing, B.M., Gerald E., & Johansson, B. (2009). What matters, and what matters most, for change in life satisfaction in the oldest-old? A study over 6 years among individuals 80+. Aging & Mental Health, 13(2), 191-201
  5. Campbell, A., Converse, P.E., & Rodgers, W.L. (1976). The Quality of American Life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation
  6. Carstensen L.L., Fung H.H., & Charles, S.T. (2003). Socioemotional selectivity theory and the regulation of emotion in the second half of life. Motivation and Emotion, 27(2), 103-123
  7. Charles, S.T., Reynolds, C.A., & Gatz, M. (2001). Age-related differences and change in positive and negative affect over 23 years. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 136-151
  8. Choudhary, A.A. (2013). Study of life satisfaction and health in old age. International Journal of Science and Research, 4(9), 1276-1281
  9. Costa, P.T., Jr., & McCrae, R.R. (1980). Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(4), 668-678
  10. Diener, E., & Diener, M. (1995). Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 653-663
  11. Diener, E., & Suh, E.M. (1997). Measuring quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 40, 189-216
  12. Diener, E., & Suh, E.M. (2000). Measuring subjective well-being to compare the quality of life of cultures. In E. Diener, & E.M. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being (pp. 3-12). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press
  13. Eid, M., & Diener, E. (2004). Global judgments of subjective well-being: Situational variability and long-term stability. Social Indicators Research, 65(3), 245-277
  14. Freund, A.M., & Baltes, P.B. (2002). Life-management strategies of selection, optimization, and compensation: Measurement by self-report and construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 642-662
  15. Heller, D., Watson, D., & Hies, R. (2004). The role of person versus situation in life satisfaction: A critical examination. Psychological Bulletin, 130(4), 574-600
  16. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
  17. Holahan, C.K., Holahan, C.J., Velasquez, K.E., & North, R.J. (2008). Longitudinal change in happiness during aging: The predictive role of positive expectancies. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 66, 229-241
  18. Jones, T., Rapport, L., Hanks, R., Lichtenberg, P., & Telmet, K. (2003). Cognitive and psychosocial predictors of subjective well-being in urban older adults. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 17(1), 3-18
  19. Jung, C.M., & Mankyu, C. (2010). Factors related to perceived life satisfaction among the elderly in South Korea. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, 43(4), 292-300. https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2010.43.4.292
  20. Kang, S., Shaver, P.R., & Sue S. (2003). Culture-specific patterns in the prediction of life satisfaction: Roles of emotion, relationship quality, and self-esteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(12), 1596-1608
  21. Kitayama, S., & Markus, H.R. (2000). The pursuit of happiness and the realization of sympathy: Cultural patterns of self, social relations, and well-being. In E. Diener, & E.M. Suh (Eds.). Culture and subjective well-being (pp. 113-161). Cambridge, MA, US: The MIT Press
  22. Kitayama, S., Markus, H.R., & Kurokawa, M. (2000). Culture, emotion, and well-being: Good feelings in Japan and the United States. Cognition and Emotion, 14(1), 93-124
  23. Kozerska, A. (2015). Life satisfaction among people aged 60 and over, participating in restricted social networks in Poland: Related variables. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 67, 29-39
  24. Kutubaeva, R.Zh. (2019). Analysis of life satisfaction of the elderly population on the example of Sweden, Austria and Germany. Population and Economics, 3(3), 102-116. https://doi.org/10.3897/popecon.3.e47192
  25. Lawton, M.P. (1975). The Philadelphia Geriatric Center Morale Scale: A revision. Journal of Gerontology, 30, 85-89
  26. Markus, H.R., & Kitayama, X. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253
  27. Mroczek, D.K., & Kolarz, C.M. (1998). The effect of age on positive and negative affect: A developmental perspective on happiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(5), 1333-1349
  28. Mustaeva, F.A., Sizonenko, Z.L., & Yuldasheva, O.N. (2016). The research of the role of a family in the life of an elderly person. The Journal of scientific articles “Health and Education Millennium”, 18(10), 143-147. (In Russ.)
  29. Neugarten, B.L., Havighurst R.J., & Tobin, S. (1961). The measurement of life satisfaction. Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences, 16, 134-143
  30. Ng, S.T., Tey N.P., & Asadullah, M.N. (2017). What matters for life satisfaction among the oldest-old? Evidence from China. Plos One, 12(2), e0171799. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171799
  31. Nishiguchi, Sh., Yamada, M., & Fukutani, N. (2014). Spot the Difference for Cognitive Decline: A quick memory and attention test for screening cognitive decline. Gerontology and Geriatric, 6(1), 9-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcgg.2014.08.003
  32. Oishi, S. (2000). Goals as cornerstones of subjective well-being: Linking individuals and cultures. In E. Diener, & E.M. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being (pp. 87-112). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press
  33. Oishi, S., & Diener, E. (2001). Goals, culture, and subjective well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(12), 1674-1682
  34. Panina, N.V. (1993). Indeks zhiznennoi udovletvorennosti. In A.A. Kronik (Ed.), LifeLine i drugie novye metody psikhologii zhiznennogo puti (pp. 107-114). Moscow: Progress Publ. (In Russ.)
  35. Pramanik, S., & Biswal, S. (2020). Ageism, psychological capital and life satisfaction: A study on elderly women. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 8(2), 1217-1225. https://doi.org/10.25215/0802.139
  36. Steptoe, A., Deaton, A., & Stone, A. (2015). Psychological wellbeing, health and ageing. Lancet, 385, 640-648. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61489-0
  37. Stone, A.A., Schwartz, J.E., Broderick, J.E., & Deaton, A.A. (2010). Snapshot of the age distribution of psychological well-being in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(22), 9985-9090. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1003744107
  38. Uchida, Y., & Kitayama, S. (2009). Happiness and unhappiness in East and West: Themes and variations. Emotion, 9, 441-456
  39. Uchida, Y., Kitayama, S., Mesquita, B., Reyes J., & Morling, B. (2008). Is perceived emotional support beneficial? Well-being and health in independent and interdependent cultures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 741-754
  40. Uchida, Y., Norasakkunkit, V., & Kitayama, S. (2004). Cultural constructions of happiness: Theory and empirical evidence. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5(3), 223-239

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».