NON-TRIVIALITY OF THE RESULTS OF MILGRAM FIELD EXPERIMENT IN MOSCOW AND NEW YORK SUBWAY

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Non-triviality of the results of the field experiment conducted on Stanley Milgram’s methodology in the New York and Moscow subway have been studied. The statistical significance of the difference between empirical and predicted results has been taken as the non-triviality criterion. 208 respondents (psychologists and students studying psychology) were asked to predict an experimental result in dependence on an experimenter’s and subject’s gender, a subject’s age, and a city where the experiment was carried out. The obtained results have confirmed our hypothesis on non-triviality of the experiments in subways: it has been showed that there is a statistically significant difference between real behavior of subway passengers (in New York and in Moscow) and predictions made by Moscow and Tashkent respondents. Practically in most cases the predicted probability that a subject gives a seat after request of experimenter (young woman or young man) is much less than in reality. The structural equation modeling (SEM) has been used to analyze the data by constructing the model taking account of all factors mentioned above. The model fit the experimental data well (CFI = 0.919). It has been found that predicted results depend not only on gender, age, and residence of a respondent but also on the degree of familiarity with the research. The obtained data give an important material for a further study of the role of situational (an experiment design) and individual (respondent characteristics) factors in predicted results; they contribute to further understanding of the problem of creation and support of non-formal social norms in various cultures and show new aspects of research carried out on experimental methodology of Stanley Milgram.

About the authors

Olga V Mitina

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: omitina@inbox.ru
Ph.D. in Psychology, leading scientific fellow of Faculty of Psychology of Lomonosov Moscow State University (Moscow, Russia) Mokhovaya str., 11 (Bld 9), Moscow, Russia, 125009

Alexander Ya Voronov

State Academic University for the Humanities

Email: a_voronov@inbox.ru
Ph.D. in Biology, associate professor of Faculty of Psychology of State Academic University for the Humanities (Moscow, Russia) Yaroslavskaya str., 13, Moscow, Russia, 129366

References

  1. Al’-Batal, T.M. (2009). Problema soblyudeniya social’nyh norm: eksperimenty v moskovskom i sanktpeterburgskom metro (po Milgremu i Sabini). Prakticheskaya psihologiya obrazovaniya 21 veka: problemy i perspektivy. Conference Procedeengs (pp. 218-226). Kolomna. (In Russ.).
  2. Bentler, P.M. (2000). EQS 6 structural equations program manual. Encino CA: Multivariate Software Inc.
  3. Bicchieri, C.(2006). The grammar of society: the nature and dynamics of social norms. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511616037.
  4. Cialdini, R.B., Kallgren, C.A, & Reno R.R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 58, 1015-1026. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60330-5.
  5. Cliffs, N.J., Schultz, N., Cialdini R.B., Goldstein, N.J., & Griskevicius, V. (2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science, 18 (5), 429-434.
  6. Luo, M. (2004, 14 Sept.). Revisiting a social experiment, and the fear that goes with it. New York Times, 153 (52972), B1-B8.
  7. Milgram, S. (2001). Eksperiment v social’noi psihologii. St. Petersburg: Piter. (In Russ.).
  8. Milgram, S. (2010). The individual in a social world: Essays and experiments. London: Pinter & Martin Ltd.
  9. Milgram, S., Sabini, J. (1978). On maintaining social norms: a field experiment in the subway. In A. Baum, J.E. Singer, S. Valins (Eds.). Advances in environmental psychology (vol. 1, pp. 31-40).Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  10. Mitina, O.V., Petrovskii, V.A. (2001). Netrivial’nost’ nauchnogo fakta i psihologicheskaya ekspertiza psihologov kak ekspertov. Mir psihologii, (4), 243-248. (In Russ.).
  11. Mitina, O.V., Voronov, A.Ya. (2012). Netrivial’nost’ polevogo eksperimenta v metro (paradigma Stenli Milgrema): sopostavlenie prognoznyh i real’nyh rezul’tatov. In V.A. Barabanshikov (Ed.). Eksperimental’nyi metod v strukture psihologicheskogo znaniya (pp. 656-663). Moscow: Institut psihologii RAN Publ. (In Russ.).
  12. Scott, J.F. (1971). Internalization of norms. Prentice Hall: Englewood.
  13. Takooshian, H. (1972). An observational study of norms in the New York City subway. Report on a class field experiment (Unpublished manuscript).
  14. Voronov, A.Ya., Al’-Batal, T.M. (2010). Soblyudenie neformal’nyh social’nyh norm: polevye eksperimenty v metro. In V.A. Barabanshikov (Ed.), Eksperimental’naya psihologiya v Rossii. Tradicii i perspectivi (pp. 781-786). Moscow: Institut psihologii RAN Publ. (In Russ.).
  15. Voronov, A.Ya., Mitina, O.V., Al’-Batal, T.M., Gorbunova, A.I. (2011). Soblyudenie neformal’nyh social’nyh norm: polevye eksperimenty v paradigme S. Milgrema. In V.A. Barabanshikov (Ed.). Sovremennaya eksperimental’naya psihologiya (vol. 2, pp. 375-392). Moscow: Institut psihologii RAN Publ. (In Russ.).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).