Perception of Importance of Emotional Support under Stress and Characteristics of Individual’s Social Network
- Authors: Kryukova T.L.1, Aripova A.O.1
-
Affiliations:
- Kostroma State University
- Issue: Vol 16, No 2 (2019)
- Pages: 181-195
- Section: PERSONALITY AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2313-1683/article/view/347500
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2019-16-2-181-195
- ID: 347500
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article gives the concept of emotional support as a social support component shown in stress and coping problem field; it focuses on the problem of relations between the socio-psychological traits of one’s social network and the value of emotional support. The goal is to confirm the interplay between a person’s social network while under stress with situations of different complexity levels. It is assumed that there is a connection between the social and psychological qualities of the network with stressful situations of high and medium levels of emotional complexity. The study involves 196 men and women (17-60 years old; average age - 37 years old, SD = 12.5). Among the methods there is authors’ questionnaire and the G. Perry’ Social Network technique (1990). The results show that there are relationships between the qualities of a person’s social network (breadth, structure) and its estimates of the value of emotional support in stressful situations of medium and high levels of emotional difficulty. It has been found that the emotional support is most important from people from the social network of the personality in the situations of loss, and the least important in the following situations: “reconciliation of spouses”, “end of loan payments” and others. If a person has many friends included into their social network, they value less emotional support in situations of “birth of a child” and “personal success”. People appreciate the importance of the emotional support more if they receive it from their spouse in the situation of “dismissal from work”; from the colleagues the emotional support is the most important in the situations of “dismissal” and “change of position”. At the same time, the statistically significant associations of the social and psychological qualities of the social network and the value of support for an individual in everyday life/emotionally simple situations have not been revealed.
About the authors
Tatyana L. Kryukova
Kostroma State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: tat.krukova44@gmail.com
Ph.D. in Psychology, is Full Professor, Professor of the Department of General and Social Psychology, Kostroma State University
14 1 May St., Kostroma, 156961, Russian FederationAnastasia O. Aripova
Kostroma State University
Email: skorobogatyhao@mail.ru
graduate student of the Department of General and Social Psychology, Kostroma State University
14 1 May St., Kostroma, 156961, Russian FederationReferences
- Bodrov, V.A. (2006). Psihologicheskij stress: razvitie i preodolenie. Moscow: PER SE Publ. (In Russ.)
- Burleson, B.R., & MacGeorge, E.L. (2002). Supportive communication. In M.L. Knapp, & J.A. Daly (Eds), Handbook of Interpersonal Communication (pp. 374—424). Thousand Oaks (CA).
- Cobb, S. (1976). Social support as a moderator of life stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 38(5), 300—314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006842-197609000-00003
- Cohen, S., & Wills, T.A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310—357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.98.2.310
- Collins, N.L., Ford, M.B., & Holmes, J.G. (2011). An Attachment Theory Perspective on Social Support in Close Relationships. In L.M. Horowitz & S. Strack (Eds), Handbook of Interpersonal Psychology (pp. 216—217). Wiley & Sons. doi: 10.1002/9781118001868.ch13
- Cross, R. & Parker, A. (2004). The Hidden Power of Social Networks: Understanding How Work Really Gets Done in Organizations. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/ choice.42-0398
- Dixon, N.F. (1980). Humor: A cognitive alternative to stress? In I.G. Sarason & C.D. Spielberger (Eds), Stress and anxiety (vol. 7, pp. 281—289). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
- Folkman, S. & Lazarus, R.S. (1991). Coping and emotion. In A. Monat & R.S. Lazarus (Eds). Stress and Coping: An Anthology (pp. 207—227). N.-Y: Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/ mona92982-018
- Fontana, D., Perri, G., Brum, A., & Dzhelliko, Kh. (1995). Kak spravit’sya so stressom. Moscow: Pedagogika-Press. (In Russ.)
- Grinberg, D. (2002). Upravlenie stressom. Saint Petersburg: Piter Publ. (In Russ.)
- Hansell, S. (1985). Adolescent friendship networks and distress in school. Social Forces, 63, 698—715. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2578487
- Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G.J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Holmes, Т.Н., & Rahe, R.H. (1967). The Social Readjustment Rating Scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 11, 213—218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3999(67)90010-4
- Kazmina, O.Y. (1993). Social’nye seti i razvitie social’nogo povedeniya. Rukovodstvo po ocenke urovnya razvitiya social’nogo povedeniya starsheklassnika. Moscow: Center of Sociology of Education, RAE. (In Russ.)
- Karabanova, O.A. (2006). Psikhologiya semeinyh otnoshenii i osnovy semejnogo konsul’tirovaniya. Moscow: Gardariki Publ. (In Russ.)
- Kitaev-Smyk, L.A. (2009). Psihologiya stressa: psihologicheskaya antropologiya stressa: monografiya. Moscow: Akademicheskij proekt Publ. (In Russ.)
- Klecina, I.S. (2004). Psihologiya gendernyh otnoshenij: teoriya i praktika. Saint Petersburg: Aletejya Publ. (In Russ.)
- Korzhova, E.Y. (2001). Razvitie lichnosti v kontekste zhiznennoj situacii. Psihologiya socialnyh situacij (pp. 279—285). Saint Petersburg: Piter Publ. (In Russ.)
- Kryukova, T.L. (2003). Rol’ kognitivnogo ocenivaniya v psihologicheskom sovladanii lichnosti. Tvorcheskoe nasledie A.V. Brushlinskogo i O.K. Tihomirova i sovremennaya psihologiya myshleniya: Conferency Proseedings (pp. 86—89). Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN Publ. (In Russ.)
- Kryukova, T.L. (2010). Psikhologiya Sovladayushchego Povedeniya. Kostroma: Nekrasov KSU Publ. (In Russ.)
- Kryukova, T.L., Saporovskaya, M.V., & Kuftyak, E.V. (2005). Psihologiya sem’i: zhiznennye trudnosti i sovladenie s nimi. Saint Petersburg: Rech Publ. (In Russ.)
- Lazarus, R. (1970). Teoriya stressa i psihofiziologicheskie issledovaniya. In L. Levi (Ed.), Emocionalnyi Stress (pp. 178—208). Leningrad: Medicina Publ. (In Russ.)
- Matrekhina, N.V. (2006). Social’naya set cheloveka v kontekste ego zhiznennyh situacij: Ph. D. in Psychology Thesis. Saint Petersburg. (In Russ.)
- Regan, Р.С. (2011). Close Relationships. NY and London: Routledge. http://dx.doi. org/10.4324/9780203834749
- Pierce, G.R., Sarason, B.R., & Sarason, I.G. (Eds). (1996). Plenum series on stress and coping. Handbook of Social Support and the Family (pp. 43—65). New York: Plenum Press. http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1388-3
- Silanteva, T.A. (2010). Social’naya podderzhka kak resurs sovladaniya so stressom v trudnoj zhiznennoj situacii. Psihologiya stressa i sovladayushchego povedeniya: Conferency Proseedings (vol. 1, pp. 177— 179). Kostroma: Nekrasov KSU Publ. (In Russ.)
- Vaux, A. (1988). Social Support: Theory, Research, and Intervention. New York: Praeger. http://dx.doi. org/10.1176/ps.41.4.460
- Vodopyanova, N.E. (2009). Psihodiagnostika Stressa. Saint Petersburg: Piter Publ. (In Russ.) Zhuravlev, A.L. (2004). Psihologicheskie faktory fizicheskogo i psihicheskogo zdorov’ya cheloveka. Psihologicheskij zhurnal, 25(3), 107—117. (In Russ.)
Supplementary files
