Spatial Approach to Studying Regional Security in Central Asia
- Autores: Pritchin S.A.1
-
Afiliações:
- IMEMO, Russian Academy of Sciences
- Edição: Volume 25, Nº 4 (2025): Humanitarian Aspects of Modern International Relations
- Páginas: 684-696
- Seção: REGIONAL ASPECTS OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2313-0660/article/view/365350
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2025-25-4-684-696
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HJPFPU
- ID: 365350
Citar
Resumo
The article presents the results of a study that employed a spatial approach to examine the formation and evolution of national and regional security systems in Central Asia. The study introduces the concept of the density of the defense policy space as an assessment of the quality and reliability of the regulatory and practical security system and the depth of involvement of external players in its formation. The relevance of assessing the contribution of each player in establishing a regional security system lies in the fact that Central Asia is undergoing a new stage of competition between major players for in uence. The proposed package of projects by external players includes initiatives for defense cooperation and interaction in the eld of military-technical cooperation. Since gaining independence in 1991, the regional states have relied on the Russian Federation to guarantee their security. In the current climate, it is important to assess the impact of the initiatives and projects of major actors such as the People’s Republic of China (PRC), the United States, Türkiye and other major actors on the Russian-Central Asian common defense policy space. The article analyzes the region’s existing security architecture at the time of the collapse of the USSR, the risks and challenges faced by the countries during the period of independence, as well as the initiatives and mechanisms employed by regional countries and external actors to ensure security, using a spatial approach. The study’s main conclusion asserts that, after a series of crises, countries in the region ultimately formed a closed model of regional security based on security guarantees from the Russian Federation and signi cant political support from the PRC, having tested a balanced and diversi ed foreign policy defense model. Western countries have failed to secure the status of a security partner for Central Asian countries, with the exception of speci c areas of cooperation in educational, peacekeeping, and biological programs.
Palavras-chave
Sobre autores
Stanislav Pritchin
IMEMO, Russian Academy of Sciences
Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: pritchin.stanislav@yandex.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0001-9464-9836
Código SPIN: 2524-6932
PhD (History), Head, Central Asian Sector, Center for Post-Soviet Studies
23 Profsouyznaya St, Moscow, 117997, Russian FederationBibliografia
- Davydov, A. A. (2022a). An approach to the analysis of bilateral relations. World Economy and International Relations, 66(9), 111–118. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-9-111-118; EDN: GUOICD
- Davydov, A. A. (2022b). On the strategic importance of Central Asia for the United States. Rossiya i Novye Gosudarstva Evrazii, (4), 60–77. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.20542/2073-4786-2022-4-60-77; EDN: SQWRIP
- Fefelov, D. V., & Timoshenko, N. R. (2023). Protests in Karakalpakstan as a factor of regional destabilization. Rossiya i Novye Gosudarstva Evrazii, (2), 189–201. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.20542/2073-4786-2023-2-189-201; EDN: AZIXOW
- Ionova, E. P. (2013). Central Asia and China: A new stage of relations. Rossiya i Novye Gosudarstva Evrazii, (4), 99–105. (In Russian). EDN: PBNSXZ
- Karimova, M. (2009). The role of Russia in the settlement of the inter-Tajik conflict and in the development of Tajikistan. Russia and the Moslem World, (4), 92–97. (In Russian). EDN: JXKUWF
- Kosolapov, N. A. (2005a). Globalization: Territorial and spatial aspect. World Economy and International Relations, (6), 3–13. (In Russian). EDN: HSCJRL
- Kosolapov, N. A. (2005b). Russia: Territory in spaces of globalizing world. World Economy and International Relations, (7), 3–14. (In Russian). EDN: HSTXMZ
- Krivopalov, A. A. (2021). CSTO: At the close of the second decade of its history. World Economy and International Relations, 65(7), 126–134. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-7-126-134; EDN: TJUHHK
- Malysheva, D. B. (2014). Security challenges in Central Asia. Russia and the Moslem World, (1), 76–94. (In Russian). EDN: OIOQBV
- Malysheva, D. B. (2022). Afghanistan and the new international configuration in Asia. World Economy and International Relations, 66(4), 35–43. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-4-35-43; EDN: SYHLUK
- Mirzekhanov, V. S., & Tulpakov, M. V. (2018). The doctrine of positive neutrality and foreign policy priorities of post-Soviet Turkmenistan. Social Sciences and Humanities. Domestic and Foreign Literature. Series 9: Oriental and African Studies, (3), 19–28. (In Russian). EDN: YPVGSL
- Murtazin, M. F. (2018). Tajikistan: Victory over Islamism? Rossiya i Novye Gosudarstva Evrazii, (2), 109–129. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.20542/2073-4786-2018-2-109-129; EDN: XVBLRJ
- Pritchin, S. A. (2021). In the mirror of transitology: The politics of power alternation in the Caucasus and Central Asia. Lomonosov World Politics Journal, 13(4), 7–42. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.48015/2076-7404-2021-13-4-7-42; EDN: UBIYMK
- Pritchin, S. A. (2022a). The Great Game 2.0 in Central Asia at the present stage. World Economy and International Relations, 66(6), 112–123. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-6-112-123; EDN: PFTDIV
- Pritchin, S. A. (2022b). The political crisis in Kazakhstan. Rossiya i Novye Gosudarstva Evrazii, (1), 56–67. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.20542/2073-4786-2022-1-56-67; EDN: PNVFJF
- Pritchin, S. A. (2023). Multi-vectoral approach as the key model of Central Asian countries’ foreign policy. World Economy and International Relations, 67(12), 104–115. (In https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2023-67-12-104-115; EDN: OMSWVP
- Prokhorenko, I. L. (2015). Spatial approach in international relations studies. Moscow: IMEMO RAN publ. (In Russian). EDN: VOEWUN
- Prokhorenko, I. L. (2024). NATO’s partnership policy: From the military alliance to the security community, and back again. Lomonosov World Politics Journal, 16(1), 141–162. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.48015/2076-7404-2024-16-1-141-162; EDN: AMILCJ
- Starr, F. (2005). Partnership for Central Asia. Rossia v Global’noj Politike, 3(4), 72–87. (In Russian). EDN: XCENQB
- Svistunova, I. A. (2023). Turkish-Kazakhstani relations at the present stage. Rossiya i Novye Gosudarstva Evrazii, (3), 45–54. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.20542/2073-4786-2023-3-45-54; EDN: SLVUEN
- Svistunova, I. A. (2024). Turkey’s policy of uniting Turkic countries: From culture to economy. World Economy and International Relations, 68(11), 104–114. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2024-68-11-104-114; EDN: BTZFMW
- Titarenko, A. M. (2021). The Chinese factor in Tajikistan: Prospects and threats. Rossiya i Novye Gosudarstva Evrazii, (3), 110–125. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.20542/2073-4786-2021-3-110-125; EDN: UJGXZI
- Vernigora, A. A. (2023). Turkish investments in Central Asian countries. Rossiya i Novye Gosudarstva Evrazii, (4), 139–153. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.20542/2073-4786-2023-4-139-153; EDN: NKXPOV
- Voitolovsky, F. G. (2021). The US strategy in the changing world order: Challenges for Russia. Vestnik Rossijskoj Akademii Nauk, 91(7), 616–626. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869587321070148; EDN: NWGYOY
- Yufei, W. (2023). China’s policy in Central Asia: A conceptual context. Rossiya i Novye Gosudarstva Evrazii, (4), 95–110. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.20542/2073-4786-2023-4-95-110; EDN: GSBSEU
Arquivos suplementares

