The Role of Civil Society in the Strategic Partnership between Brazil and the EU

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The relevance of the topic stems from the growing role of civil society as a key actor in shaping bilateral relations between Brazil and the European Union (EU). In the context of global challenges, ranging from human rights protection to the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals, cooperation between nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and non-pro t associations is gaining strategic importance, while remaining insu ciently studied in the scienti c literature. It is especially important to understand how civil society in uences foreign policy decision-making, including the complex processes such as negotiations on the EU - MERCOSUR agreement. The study uses an institutional and systematic approach complemented by historical and political analysis. Methods of comparative analysis, generalization of statistical data (including that from the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics, IBGE), as well as the qualitative analysis of policy documents, reports and public statements from civil society organizations and EU institutions are used. The scienti c novelty of the work lies in the comprehensive consideration of the interaction between Brazilian and EU civil societies as an independent level of international partnership. For the rst time in the Russian scienti c researches, the mechanisms of in uence of NGOs on Brazil’s foreign policy have been analyzed in such detail, including their role in suspending the rati cation of the trade agreement with the EU, and cyclical dependencies between the domestic political situation and the level of activity of the civil sector have been identi ed. The results of the study demonstrate that Brazilian civil society not only engages in dialogue with European partners through such formats as the EU - Brazil Round Table, but is also able to in uence the country’s foreign policy course. While EU support strengthens democratic institutions and promotes a “green transition,” there is also a risk of NGOs being used for external interference. In conclusion, it is emphasized that a sustainable partnership between Brazil and the EU is impossible without the involvement of civil society, which is both a resource for cooperation and a potential source of tension.

About the authors

Violetta S. Olkhovskaia

Institute of Latin America, Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: v.s.olkhovskaia@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4130-3783
SPIN-code: 7484-2010

Research Fellow, Center for Political Studies

21, bldg 16, Bolshaya Ordynka St, Moscow, 115035, Russian Federation

References

  1. Barbosa, I. M. da S. P. (2007). Sociedade civil brasileira: ação, articulação e mobilização. Revista Terceiro Setor & Gestão de Anais — UNG-Ser, 1(1), 34–38. Retrieved from https://revistas.ung.br/index.php/3setor/article/view/77
  2. Borzova, A. Yu. (2013). The development of the strategic partnership between Brazil and the European Union. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, (4), 47–57. (In Russian) EDN: PSNMTH
  3. Dahrendorf, R. (2002). Contemporary social conflict. Essays on the politics of freedom. Moscow: ROSSPEN publ. (In Russian).
  4. Davydov, V. M. (Ed.). (2019). Brazil: A change of priorities in a new political cycle. Moscow: Institut Latinskoj Ameriki RAN publ. (In Russian) EDN: GLPXWT
  5. Diakova, L. V. (2022). Latin American civil society facing the challenges of the time and the practice of social solidarity in the period of COVID-19. Latinskaia Amerika, (1), 6–22. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044748X0018048-1; EDN: AUJUSD
  6. Gainutdinova, L. A. (2009). Civil society in Argentina and Brazil. Latinskaia Amerika, (11), 72–79. (In Russian) EDN: VIMDUP
  7. Kanúnnikov, A. A. (2016). La Unión Europea y la sociedad civil de Latinoamérica. Iberoamérica, (4), 90–113. EDN: XESYXR
  8. Kanunnikov, A. A. (2014). The European Union — Latin America: Economic, political, and social cooperation. Moscow: Institut Evropy RAN publ. (In Russian). EDN: TQHLRJ
  9. Kanunnikov, A. A. (2020). Non-governmental organizations and the EU — MERCOSUR trade agreement. Latinskaia Amerika, (1), 47–53. (In Russian). EDN: EZMEQD
  10. Kanunnikov, A. A. (2021). Civil society dialogue between Latin America and the European Union. Latinskaia Amerika, (6), 6–18. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044748X0014980-7; EDN: CWHHNA
  11. Keane, J. (1998). Civil society: Old images, new visions. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  12. Kolesnikova, N. A., & Ryabova, E. V. (2016). Civil society in modern Russia. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnoe izdanie “Etnosoczium i mezhnaczional’naya kul’tura” publ. (In Russian). EDN: VNKUEB
  13. Kuznetsova, E. E. (2012). Social policy in Latin American countries at the beginning of the 21st century: Continuity and change. Latinskaia Amerika, (6), 14–20. (In Russian). EDN: PBMKIN
  14. Lage, D., & Brant, L. (2008). The Growing influence of non-governmental organizations: Chances and risks. Anuário Brasileiro de Direito Internacional, (III–1), 79–93. Retrieved from https://www.corteidh.or.cr/tablas/r27121.pdf
  15. Malashenkova, A. A., & Kharitonova, O. G. (2022). Populist presidents and civil society on Latin American democracies. RUDN Journal of Political Science, 24(2), 247–267. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2022-24-2-247-267; EDN: FMGJMG
  16. Saravia, M. G. (2014). Os limites da parceria estratégica Brasil–União Europeia nos planos interregional e multilateral. Anuario de Integración, (10), 400–422. Retrieved from https://eulacfoundation.org/system/files/digital_library/2023-07/Os%20limites%20da%20parceira%20estrat%C3 %A9gica.pdf
  17. Tayar, V. M. (2018). The European Union and Latin America: Interregional economic cooperation in the XXI century. Current Problems of Europe, (3), 23–43. (In Russian). EDN: ZTBKZK
  18. Tayar, V. M. (2020). EU — Latin America: Towards a constructive model of partnership. Contemporary Europe, (6), 90–100. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.15211/soveurope6202090100; EDN: SYFAQO
  19. Tayar, V. M. (2022). European Union and Latin America: The main forms and trends of interregional cooperation. Current Problems of Europe, (3), 44–66. (In Russian). EDN: CRPNOY
  20. Wampler, A., & Avritzer, L. (2004). Participatory publics: Civil society and new institutions in democratic Brazil. Comparative Politics, 36(3), 291–312. https://doi.org/10.2307/4150132

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).