Effectiveness of sensorimotor training in different social conditions of men’s and women’s activities in mono-gender dyads
- Authors: Murtazina E.P.1, Galushka E.S.1, Ermakova O.I.1, Zotova O.M.2, Markovtseva M.A.2, Trifonova N.Y.1, Pertsov S.S.1,2
-
Affiliations:
- Federal Research Center for Innovator and Emerging Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Technologies
- Russian University of Medicine
- Issue: Vol 29, No 3 (2025): ONCOLOGY
- Pages: 397-409
- Section: Physiology
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2313-0245/article/view/349494
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0245-2025-29-3-397-409
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RNZYWV
- ID: 349494
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Relevance. Investigation the features of human achievement of the results of purposeful activity in different conditions of social interactions is relevant and of high significance. The importance of this issue is underscored by the need to equip businesses with skilled professionals who possess the necessary competencies, including social abilities, in line with the evolving demands of the modern world, and also to increase the effectiveness of the educational process. Furthermore, it is crucial to safeguard the psychosomatic health of the general public, which is heavily influenced by societal factors throughout their lives and work relationships. The aim of the study was to examine changes in performance measures of sensorimotor training in different social contexts of activity in same-sex male and female pairs. Materials and Methods: Sixty-five pairs of men and 63 pairs of women (age 19 years 7 months ± 3 months) were examined, using the sensorimotor training “Columns” of the hardware-software complex “BOS-Kinesis” (Neurotech LLC, Taganrog, Russia). The research protocol included performing the tasks in different social contexts: individually, competitively, and collaboratively with a partner in conditions with and without feedback from participants’ actions. Results and Discussion. Three groups of subjects were identified according to the indicator of maximum performance in three individual trainings: high-, medium-, and low-performers. In competition, an increase in productivity was observed in the latter two groups. Sex differences were found in the proportion of subjects with initially low performance who improved performance in competition: their % was significantly lower among men than in the sample of women. In interpersonal sensorimotor coordination with feedback from partners’ actions, males had a significant decrease in personal performance and pair integral outcome measures, in contrast to female dyads. In cooperation without feedback from participants’ actions, a decrease in personal and integral performance was found for all pairs of subjects, but it was more significant in male dyads. Conclusion. Changes in result indicators in the joint contexts in dyads of subjects were determined by their initial individual performance levels and differed significantly between male and female pairs.
Keywords
About the authors
Elena P. Murtazina
Federal Research Center for Innovator and Emerging Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Technologies
Author for correspondence.
Email: murtazina_ep@academpharm.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4243-8727
SPIN-code: 4445-4178
Moscow, Russian Federation
Ekaterina S. Galushka
Federal Research Center for Innovator and Emerging Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Technologies
Email: murtazina_ep@academpharm.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9256-0253
SPIN-code: 4171-7590
Moscow, Russian Federation
Olga I. Ermakova
Federal Research Center for Innovator and Emerging Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Technologies
Email: murtazina_ep@academpharm.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4860-6151
SPIN-code: 4609-3885
Moscow, Russian Federation
Oksana M. Zotova
Russian University of Medicine
Email: murtazina_ep@academpharm.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0002-9869-5914
SPIN-code: 9966-1708
Moscow, Russian Federation
Maria. A. Markovtseva
Russian University of Medicine
Email: murtazina_ep@academpharm.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0006-8163-5658
SPIN-code: 9536-7953
Moscow, Russian Federation
Natalia Yu. Trifonova
Federal Research Center for Innovator and Emerging Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Technologies
Email: murtazina_ep@academpharm.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4631-4617
Moscow, Russian Federation
Sergey S. Pertsov
Federal Research Center for Innovator and Emerging Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Technologies; Russian University of Medicine
Email: murtazina_ep@academpharm.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5530-4990
SPIN-code: 3876-0513
Moscow, Russian Federation
References
- Martsinkovskaya TD, Khoroshilov DA. The psychology of social cognition: Prospects for development in a changing society. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology. 2023;13(1):12–23. (In Russian) doi: 10.21638/spbu16.2023.101
- Krendl AC, Betzel RF. Social cognitive network neuroscience. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience. 2022;17(5):510–529. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsac020
- Coulombe S, Hardy K, Goldfarb R. Promoting wellbeing through positive education: A critical review and proposed social ecological approach. Theory and Research in Education. 2020;18(3):295–321. doi: 10.1177/1477878520988432
- Evans JC, Evans MB, Slack M, Peddle M, Lingard L. Examining non-technical skills for ad hoc resuscitation teams: a scoping review and taxonomy of team-related concepts. Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine. 2021;29(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00980-5
- Markose G, Berezowski BM, Chiu GA, Cousin GCS. Situational awareness in driving, and lessons for surgeons. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2021;59(4):485–489. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.11.003
- Küçüktabak EB, Kim SJ, Wen Y, Lynch K, Pons JL. Human-machine-human interaction in motor control and rehabilitation: a review. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation. 2021;18(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00974-5.
- Jhangiani R, Tarry H, Stangor C. Principles of social psychology (1st international H5P edition). 2022. https://opentextbc.ca/socialpsychology/
- Batson JP, Kato Y, Shuster K, Patton JL, Reed KB, Tsuji T. Haptic coupling in dyads improves motor learning in a simple force field. 2020 42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC). IEEE. 2020;4795–4798. doi: 10.1109/EMBC44109.2020.9176261
- Gorsic M, Tran MH, Novak D. Cooperative cooking: a novel virtual environment for upper limb rehabilitation. Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS. 2018; 3602–3605. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2018.8513005
- Takagi A, Hirashima M, Nozaki D, Burdet E. Individuals physically interacting in a group rapidly coordinate their movement by estimating the collective goal. Elife. 2019; 8: e41328. doi: 10.7554/eLife.41328
- Mojtahedi K, Fu Q, Santello M. On the role of physical interaction on performance of object manipulation by dyads. Frontiers in human neuroscience. 2017;11:533. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00533
- Kaefer A, Chiviacowsky S. Cooperation enhances motor learning. Hum Mov Sci. 2022;85:102978. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2022.102978
- Müller F, Cañal-Bruland R. Interindividual differences in incentive sensitivity moderate motivational effects of competition and cooperation on motor performance. PloS one. 2020;15: e0237607. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237607
- Yang D, Tu CC, He TB. Effect of conscientiousness on social loafing among male and female chinese university students. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. 2024;33(2):459–469. doi: 10.1007/s40299-023-00742-0
- Buser T, Van Den Assem MJ, Van Dolder D. Gender and willingness to compete for high stakes. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 2023;206:350–70. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2022.12.016/
- Cohen L, Lansing AH. The tend and befriend theory of stress: Understanding the biological, evolutionary, and psychosocial aspects of the female stress response. In: Hazlett-Stevens H, ed. Biopsychosocial Factors of Stress, and Mindfulness for Stress Reduction. Springer International Publishing; 2021; 67–81. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-81245-4_3
- Merkulova MA, Akulina MV, Lapkin MM. Gender Features of Formation of Purposeful Human Behavior when Playing Images with Different Performance. RUDN Journal of Medicine, 23 (3), 308–317. (In Russian) doi: 10.22363/2313-0245-2019-23-3-308-317
- Spadaro G, Jin S, Balliet D. Gender differences in cooperation across 20 societies: A meta-analysis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 2023; 378(1868), 20210438. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0438
- Yang H, Duan Q, Peng M, Gu R, Sun X. Sex differences on the response to others’ gains and losses under cooperation and competition. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 2022;182:211–219. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2022.10.012
- Koay JM, Meter AV. The effect of emotion regulation on executive function. Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 2023;35(3):315–329. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2023.2172417
- Campos-Moinier K, Murday V, Brunel L. Individual differences in social interaction contexts: Examining the role of personality traits in the degree of self-other integration. Personality and Individual Differences. 2023;203:112002. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2022.112002
- Ciardo F, Wykowska A. Response coordination emerges in cooperative but not competitive joint task. Frontiers in psychology. 2018;9:1919. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01919
- Zhao Z, Salesse RN, Qu X, Marin L, Gueugnon M, Bardy BG. Influence of perceived emotion and gender on social motor coordination. British Journal of Psychology. 2020;111(3):536–555. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12419
- Stoet G. Sex differences in the Simon task help to interpret sex differences in selective attention. Psychological research. 2017;81(3):571–581. doi: 10.1007/s00426–016–0763–4
- Cheng Y, Chou KH, Decety J, Chen IY, Hung D, Tzeng OL, et al. Sex differences in the neuroanatomy of human mirror-neuron system: A voxel-based morphometric investigation. Neuroscience. 2009;158(2):713–720. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.10.026
- Wu X, Lu X, Zhang H, Bi Y, Gu R, Kon. Sex difference in trait empathy is encoded in the human anterior insula. Cerebral Cortex. 2022;33(9):5055–5065. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhac398
- Li G, Zhang S, Le TM, Tang X, Li CSR. Neural responses to reward in a gambling task: sex differences and individual variation in reward-driven impulsivity. Cerebral Cortex Communications. 2020;1(1): tgaa025. doi: 10.1093/texcom/tgaa025
Supplementary files

