YIELD TABLE OF WILLOW STANDS’ PHYTOMASS OF ARKHANGELSK OBLAST
- Authors: Paramonov A.A.1, Usoltsev V.A.2,3, Tretyakov S.V.4,1, Koptev S.V.4,1, Karaban A.A.1,4, Tsvetkov I.V.1,4, Davydov A.V.1,4, Tsepordey I.S.2
-
Affiliations:
- Northern Forestry Research Institute
- Ural State Forest Engineering University
- Botanical Garden, Russian Academy of Sciences, Ural Branch
- M. V. Lomonosov Northern (Arctic) Federal University
- Issue: No 2 (2023)
- Pages: 33-39
- Section: RESEARCH ARTICLES
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2311-1410/article/view/350535
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.15372/SJFS20230204
- ID: 350535
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
In Russia, the intensive growth of areas naturally overgrown with such species as willow ( Salix L.), alder ( Alnus Mill.), pine ( Pinus L.), etc., increases the biodiversity of entire regions, but the contribution of these areas to the carbon balance and climate stabilization is mostly unknown. Especially critical in this regard is the situation with willow plantations, which was not included in the system of State accounting of the forest fund. Since the energy generated from willow plantations is CO2 neutral, the use of this renewable and sustainable energy source has the potential to reduce global CO2 emissions from fossil fuels. Willow phytomass can be used for the production of fuel in the form of chips, briquettes and pellets, and in some cases - for the production of bioethanol or wood gas. In addition to economic aspects, willow cultivation has a number of environmental advantages, such as the ability to accumulate toxins from polluted areas, improve landscaping and serve as hedges. To plan and manage forestry in willow plantations in the conditions of the North taiga subzone of Arkhangelsk Oblast and assess its contribution to the carbon balance, data on the biological productivity of willow trees and standards for assessing their phytomass are needed. The purpose of the study is to develop models and tables for assessing the structure and dynamics of the aboveground phytomass of the willow stands in the conditions of Arkhangelsk Oblast. To achieve it, the following tasks have been implemented: 52 sample plots have been established to assess aboveground phytomass of willows; regression models of the dependence of willow phytomass on the volume-forming inventory indicators of trees are constructed; the models obtained are combined with the yield table of willow stands and the table of age dynamics of willow phytomass is constructed according to site indices for the conditions of Arkhangelsk Oblast. A comparative analysis of the results obtained with data on the productivity of willows in Sweden showed that at the same age of stands, the stocks of aboveground phytomass of Swedish willow correspond to the stocks of phytomass of willows of Arkhangelsk Oblast at an average level between the I and II site productivity classes.
About the authors
A. A. Paramonov
Northern Forestry Research Institute
Author for correspondence.
Email: a.paramonov@sevniilh-arh.ru
Arkhangelsk, Russian Federation
V. A. Usoltsev
Ural State Forest Engineering University; Botanical Garden, Russian Academy of Sciences, Ural Branch
Email: usoltsev50@mail.ru
Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation; Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation
S. V. Tretyakov
M. V. Lomonosov Northern (Arctic) Federal University; Northern Forestry Research Institute
Email: s.v.tretyakov@narfu.ru
Arkhangelsk, Russian Federation; Arkhangelsk, Russian Federation
S. V. Koptev
M. V. Lomonosov Northern (Arctic) Federal University; Northern Forestry Research Institute
Email: s.koptev@narfu.ru
Arkhangelsk, Russian Federation; Arkhangelsk, Russian Federation
A. A. Karaban
Northern Forestry Research Institute; M. V. Lomonosov Northern (Arctic) Federal University
Email: karaban@sevniilh-arh.ru
Arkhangelsk, Russian Federation; Arkhangelsk, Russian Federation
I. V. Tsvetkov
Northern Forestry Research Institute; M. V. Lomonosov Northern (Arctic) Federal University
Email: i.tsvetkov@narfu.ru
Arkhangelsk, Russian Federation; Arkhangelsk, Russian Federation
A. V. Davydov
Northern Forestry Research Institute; M. V. Lomonosov Northern (Arctic) Federal University
Email: davydov.a@edu.narfu.ru
Arkhangelsk, Russian Federation; Arkhangelsk, Russian Federation
I. S. Tsepordey
Ural State Forest Engineering University
Email: ivan.tsepordey@yandex.ru
Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation
References
- Анучин Н. П. Лесная таксация. М.: Лесн. пром-сть, 1982. 552 c.
- Горобец А. И., Лихацкий Ю. П. Влияние почвенно-гидрологических условий на продуктивность микроротационной плантации ивы корзиночной // Тр. СПбНИИЛХ. 2016. № 4. С. 98-108.
- Гусев И. И. Моделирование экосистем. Архангельск: АГТУ, 2002. 112 c.
- Демидова Н. А., Дуркина Т. М. Результаты испытания местных и интродуцированных видов рода Salix на Европейском Севере России // Науч. ведом. БелГУ. Сер.: Естеств. науки. 2012. Т. 140. № 21. С. 23-29.
- Жижин С. М., Магасумова А. Г., Оплетаев А. С. Зарастание древесной растительностью сельскохозяйственных угодий в южной подзоне тайги Республики Удмуртия // Вестн. Бурят. гос. с.-х. акад. 2021. Т. 63. № 2. С. 84-91.
- Парамонов А. А., Третьяков С. В., Коптев С. В. Таблицы хода роста нормальных ивовых древостоев таёжной зоны Северо-Востока Европейской части России // Тр. СПбНИИЛХ. 2021. № 2. С. 17-27.
- Парамонов А. А., Усольцев В. А., Третьяков С. В., Коптев С. В., Карабан А. А., Цветков И. В., Давыдов А. В., Цепордей И. С. Биомасса деревьев ивы и ее аллометрические модели в условиях Архангельской области // Леса России и хоз-во в них. 2022. № 4 (83). С. 10-19.
- Поздняков Л. К., Протопопов В. В., Горбатенко В. М. Биологическая продуктивность лесов Средней Сибири и Якутии. Красноярск: Краснояр. кн. изд-во, 1969. 120 с.
- Скворцов А. К. Ивы СССР: Систематический и географический обзор. М.: Наука, 1968. 262 с.
- Усольцев В. А. Биологическая продуктивность лесов Северной Евразии: методы, база данных и ее приложения. Екатеринбург: УрО РАН, 2007. 636 с.
- Фалин А. Ю. Содержание и доброкачественность дубильных веществ у трех видов рода Salix L. в Карелии // Тр. лесоинж. ф-та ПетрГУ. 2003. Т. 4. С. 141-143.
- Шабуров В. И., Беляева И. В. Итоги работ по селекции ивовых на Урале // Леса Урала и хозяйство в них. Екатеринбург: УГЛТА, 1995. Вып. 18. С. 119-127.
- Baskerville G. L. Use of logarithmic regression in the estimation of plant biomass // Can. J. For. Res. 1972. V. 2. Iss. 1. P. 49-53.
- Christersson L., Sennerby-Forsse L., Zsuffa L. The role and significance of woody biomass plantations in Swedish agriculture // For. Chron. 1993. V. 69. Iss. 6. P. 687-693.
- Dixon R. K., Brown S., Houghton R. A., Solomon A. M., Trexler M. C., Wisniewski J. Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems // Science. 1994. V. 263. N. 5144. P. 185-190.
- Heller M. C., Keoleian G. A., Volk T. A. Life cycle assessment of a willow biomass cropping system // Biomass Bioenergy. 2003. V. 25. Iss. 2. P. 147-165.
- Johansson T. Biomass of sallow (Salix caprea L.). Rep. 031. Uppsala: Swed. Univ. Agr. Sci., 2011. 32 p.
- Krzyzniak M., Stolarski M., Waliszewska B., Szczukowski S., Tworkowski J., Zaluski D., Snieg M. Willow biomass as feedstock for an integrated multi-product biorefinery // Industr. Crops & Products. 2014. V. 58. P. 230-237.
- Mahecha M. D., Bastos A., Bohn F. J., Eisenhauer N., Feilhauer H., Hartmann H., Hickler T., Kalesse-Los H., Migliavacca M., Otto F. E. L., Peng J., Quaas J., Tegen I., Weigelt A., Wendisch M., Wirth C. Biodiversity loss and climate extremes - study the feedbacks // Nature. 2022. V. 612. Р. 30-32.
- Rowe R. L., Hanley M. E., Goulson D., Clarke D. J., Doncaster C. P., Taylor G. Potential benefits of commercial willow Short Rotation Coppice (SRC) for farm-scale plant and invertebrate communities in the agro-environment // Biomass Bioenergy. 2011. V. 35. Iss. 1. P. 325-336.
- Sandak A., Sandak J., Waliszewska B., Zborowska M., Mleczek M. Selection of optimal conversion path for willow biomass assisted by near infrared spectroscopy // iForest. 2017. V. 10. Iss. 2. P. 506-514.
- Statgraphics-19, 2022. http://www.statgraphics.com/
- Usoltsev V. A., Vanclay J. K. Stand biomass dynamics of pine plantations and natural forests on dry steppe in Kazakhstan // Scand. J. For. Res. 1995. V. 10. P. 305-312.
Supplementary files


