Colonial experience of intercultural interaction on the example of Indian wars of the 17th century

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

This paper discusses European and American Indian responses to intercultural murders in colonial America in the seventeenth century. The main differences between the legal traditions of European settlers and American natives are identified. The main thing among them was the lack of institutionalized structures among Indian tribes and the existence of collective responsibility for the crime when the whole clan of the offender was punished. In this historical period many Indian tribes tried to replace the principle of blood feud by the cost of various commodities, arbitrage on the part of the sachems, «condolence ceremonies» etc. The main problem of responses to intercultural murders was the unwillingness of the parties to agree on one common jurisdiction. In this regard, any murder involving any Indian or European had an opportunity to turn into a mass conflict or even a war. The first case was the murder of the English captain John Stone, gave rise to the beginning of the Pequot War. The second case was the murder of the Indian Christian John Sassamon. In this case the colonists first declared that they had the right to judge and condemn the Indians in accordance with the English standards of justice. All this led directly to the conflict known as the King Philip’s War. These intercultural murders were one of the ways to expand the territories of the European colonies and strengthening of the settlers’ power in the region.

About the authors

Dmitriy A. Nesterov

Samara State University of Social Sciences and Education

Author for correspondence.
Email: dmitriynesterov1994@gmail.com

postgraduate student, assistant of World History, Law and Methods of Teaching Department

Russian Federation, Samara

References

  1. Field Manual, Marine Corps Warfighting Publication 3–33.5. Counterinsurgency [US Army FM 3–24]. United States Army Headquarters and United States Marine Corps Combat Development Command. Washington, DC, 15 December 2006.
  2. McFate M. Does culture matter // The military utility of understanding adversary culture. Retrieved November. 2007. Vol. 15. P. 1–22.
  3. Hoffman F.G. Neo-classical counterinsurgency? // Parameters. 2007. Vol. 37, № 2. P. 71–87.
  4. Dixon P. ‘Hearts and minds’? British counter-insurgency from Malaya to Iraq // Journal of Strategic Studies. 2009. Vol. 32, № 3. P. 353–381.
  5. Smith S. General Templer and counter-insurgency in Malaya: Hearts and minds, intelligence, and propaganda // Intelligence and National Security. 2001. Vol. 16, № 3. P. 60–78.
  6. US Marine Corps, Small Wars Manual. Washington: United States Government Printing Office, 1935 [1940].
  7. Banner S. The death penalty: an American history. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2003. 408 p.
  8. Kawashima Y. Igniting King Philip’s War. Lawrence, Kans.: University of Kansas Press, 2001. 192 p.
  9. Reid J.-Ph. A law of blood: the primitive law of the Cherokee nation. DeKalb, Ill.: Northern Illinois University Press, 2006. 348 p.
  10. Jennings F. The invasion of America: Indians, colonialism, and the cant of conquest. New York: Norton, 1976. 392 p.
  11. Lepore J. In the name of War: King Philip’s war and the origins of American identity. New York: Vintage Books, 1998. 368 p.
  12. Stannard D.E. American holocaust: Columbus and the conquest of the New World. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992. 416 p.
  13. Churchill W. A little matter of genocide: holocaust and denial in the Americas, 1492 to the present. San Francisco: City Lights Books, 1997. 531 p.
  14. Reid J.-Ph. Principles of Vengeance: fur trappers, Indians, and retaliation for homicide in the transboundary north American west // Western Historical Quarterly. 1993. Vol. 24, № 1. P. 21–44.
  15. White R. The middle ground: Indians, empires, and republics in the Great Lakes region, 1650–1815. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press, 1991. 576 p.
  16. Oberg M.L. Uncas: first of the Mohegans. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2003. 288 p.
  17. Richter D.K. The Ordeal of the longhouse: the peoples of the Iroquois league in the ear of European colonization. Chapel Hill, N.C.: University of North Carolina Press for the Institute of Early American History and Culture, 1992. 454 p.
  18. Haefeli Е. Kieft’s War and the Systems of Violence in Colonial America // Lethal imagination: violence and brutality in American history / ed. M.A. Bellesiles. New York, N.Y.: New York University Press, 1999. P. 17–40.
  19. Cave А. Who killed John Stone? A note on the origins of the Pequot war // William and Mary Quarterly. 3rd series. 1992. Vol. 49, № 3. P. 509–521.
  20. Oberg M.L. Dominion and civility: English imperialism and Native America, 1585–1685. Ithaca, N.Y: Cornell University Press, 1999. 256 p.
  21. Hubbard W. A narrative of the Indian Wars in New England. Stockbridge, MA: Willard, 1803. 394 p.
  22. Lepore J. Dead men tell no tales: John Sassamon and the fatal consequences of literacy // American Quarterly. 1994. Vol. 26, № 4. P. 479–512.
  23. James P., Ronda J. The death of John Sassamon: an exploration in writing new England Indian history // American Indian Quarterly. 1974. Vol. 1, № 2. P. 91–102.
  24. Mandell D.R. King Philip's War: colonial expansion, native resistance, and the end of Indian sovereignty. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010. 176 p.

Copyright (c) 2020 Nesterov D.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies