The military coup in Turkey on May 27, 1960: background, drivers and it consequences

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

In the 1950s, the Democratic Party came to power in Turkey, relying on the provincial bourgeoisie and clericals. The charismatic leader of democrats Adnan Menderes became the prime-minister. The Democratic government pursued an active foreign and domestic policy. In particular, abandoning its traditional neutrality, Turkey joined NATO and CenTO military blocs. Concessions were made to religious circles. The government also carried out large-scale reforms, for which the society was not ready, due to which an economic crisis erupted in the country, the most characteristic manifestation of which was high inflation. By introducing repressive laws against dissidents, attempts to isolate the opposition, in particular the leaders of the Republican People’s Party (RPP), the Democrats pushed the latter to search for allies in the army. In the ranks of the latter, under the influence of Western agents and the dissatisfaction of the officers themselves with the situation in the country, the idea of a military coup came about on May 27, 1960. As a result of the coup, the National Unity Committee came to power, consisting of representatives of the generals and leaders of the Republican People’s Party. In 1961, a new constitution was adopted at a referendum, reforming the system of legislative power in the country, after which power again passed to civilian political institutions. The leader of the military who carried out the coup, General Jemal Gürsel, became the prime minister, while the chairman of the Republican People’s Party Ismet İnönübecame became the president of Turkey.

About the authors

Malika Sharipovna Tovsultanova

Chechen State University

Email: 8979444@mail.ru

postgraduate student of Modern and Contemporary History Department

Grozny

Rustam Alkhazurovich Tovsultanov

Chechen State University

Email: rustam-tovsultanov@mail.ru

candidate of historical sciences, associate professor of Modern and Contemporary History Department

Russian Federation, Grozny

Lilia Nadipovna Galimova

Ulyanovsk Institute of Civil Aviation named after chief Marshal of aviation B.P. Bugaev

Author for correspondence.
Email: galina_200475@mail.ru

doctor of historical sciences, associate professor, professor of Humanities and Social-Economic Disciplines Department

Russian Federation, Ulyanovsk

References

  1. Beyaz Z.F. Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan: Adnan Menderes Türkiye'nin özgür bir ülke haline gelmesi için çalışmıştır [Internet] // https://aa.com.tr/tr/turkiye/cumhurbaskani-erdogan-adnan-menderes-turkiyenin-ozgur-bir-ulke-haline-gelmesi-icin-calismistir/1585342.
  2. Yesilburşa K. The «Revolution» of 27 May 1960 in Turkey: British Policy towards Turkey // Middle Eastern Studies. 2005. Vol. 41, № 1. P. 129-149.
  3. Aslan O. U.S. involvement in military coups d'état in Turkey and Pakistan during the cold war: between conspiracy and reality. Ankara: Department of Political Science and Public Administration, 2016. 280 p.
  4. Göktepe C. 1960 «revolution» in Turkey and the british polisy towards Turkey // The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations Archive. 2000. Is. 30. P. 139-187.
  5. Ульченко Н.Ю. Формирование закономерностей экономического развития Турции: дис. … д-ра ист. наук. М., 2016. 424 с.
  6. Кадыров Р.Р. Турецкая республика в 50-е годы XX века: проблемы социальных и экономических реформу // Ученые записки Казанского государственного университета. Гуманитарные науки. 2009. Т. 151, кн. 2, ч. 1. С. 208-215.
  7. Шлыков П.В. Историческая динамика социальных протестов в Турции // Вестник Московского государственного университета. Сер. 13. Востоковедение. 2015. № 4. С. 34-55.
  8. Ahmad F. The making of modern Turkey. New-York: Routledge, 2003. 252 p.
  9. Erdemir H. Turkish political history. Izmir, 2007. 243 p.
  10. Кадыров Р.Р. Турция как стратегический союзник США в 50-е годы XX века // Ученые записки Казанского государственного университета. 2010. Т. 152, кн. 3, ч. 1. С. 233-238.
  11. Ganser D. Terrorism in Western Europe: An Approach to NATO’s Secret Stay-Behind Armies // The Whitehead Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, Winter/Spring, 2005. P. 69-95.
  12. Türköne M. Derin devlet ve Kuvva-yı Milliye // Zaman Yorumlar. 2005.
  13. Киреев Н.Г. История Турции: XX век. М.: ИВ РАН Крафт+, 2007. 608 с.
  14. Шлыков П.В. Военная элита в политической системе Турецкой республики // Элиты стран Востока. М.: Ключ-С, 2011. С. 31-61.
  15. Howard D. The history of Turkey. Second edition. Santa Barbara: Greenwood, 2016. 288 p.
  16. Харитонова О.Г. Кризисная эволюция турецкой̆ политической̆ системы // Полития. Журнал политической философии и социологии политики. 2018. № 3. С. 181-205.
  17. Yavuz B., Bülbül M. Çift meclis sistemi ve Türkiye // Gazi Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi. 2012. Vol. XVI. P. 217-260.
  18. Туровская А.А. Роль армии в политическом развитии Турецкой Республики и Исламской Республики Пакистан: дис. … канд. ист. наук. М., 2014. 179 с.
  19. Ercan Ü., Sığrı Ü. Şirketlerin Şeffaflık ve Hesap Verebilirliğinin Vekâlet Kuramı Bağlamında İncelenmesi: OYAK Örnek Olayı // İş ve İnsan Dergisi. 2018. Vol. 5 (2). P. 207-223.
  20. Саркисян С. Эволюция турецкой армии в контексте политических изменений в стране // 21-й век. 2012. № 5 (25). С. 53-80.
  21. Topçu İ., Topçu S.A. Adnan Menderes’in yargilanmasi ve idami // Akademik Bakış Uluslararası Hakemli Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. Vol. 61. P. 59-80.

Copyright (c) 2020 Tovsultanova M.S., Tovsultanov R.A., Galimova L.N.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies