Leaf pigment complex of spring soft wheat cultivars of different maturity groups under different moisture regimes

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Creation of new higher productive cultivars of cereal crops is often linked with straightening of degree of resistance to abiotic environmental factors. Indirectly this degree of resistance could be estimated on quantitative change in leaf pigment composition. There is practical interest to compare the activity of pigment complex of flag leaves of wheat cultivars belonging to different maturity groups that could give information on direction of breeding improvement of plant physiological-and-genetic traits under different ecological conditions. Plants of nine breeding lines and two standard cultivars grew in 2016–2018 at the experimental field of FARC of North-East (Kirov) under continental climate conditions with moderately cold winter and warm summer. The study of flag leaves pigment complex allows to discover differences between early and middle-ripening cultivars on investigated parameters in different hydrothermal conditions. During the study years, middle-ripening cultivars accumulated more chlorophyll a than the early ones. On average this excess was about 10%. The studied cultivars were differed on distribution of pigment between structural parts of photosystems: middle-ripening cultivars had more chlorophyll a in reaction centers whereas the amount of the pigment in light-harvesting complexes was not differed. Hydrothermal conditions significantly influenced the differences between cultivar groups. Thus, under dry conditions the content of chlorophyll b and carotenoids in flag leaves of cultivars belonging to both group of maturity had no significant differences. Under normal or moist conditions middle-ripening cultivars contained 11,0–12,6% more chlorophyll b and 7,6–23,1% more carotenoids than the early cultivars. Under dry conditions the two groups of cultivars significantly differed on mass ratio chlorophyll a/b: in the middle-ripening cultivars it was 5,0% higher than in the early ones. Based on chlorophyll a and b content at flowering stage breeding lines С-64, С-65, С-103, and С-129 were selected. The amount of chlorophyll in these genotypes was significantly higher than in Margarita standard cultivar. Within the group of early cultivars, no one exceeded Bazhenka standard by the pigment content. The cultivars of this group reacted on abiotic growing conditions change very much (the amount of precipitations and air temperature): the coefficients of chlorophyll a content variation were 6,5–16,3%, of chlorophyll b content – 26,9–29,7%, of carotenoids content – 4,1–17,2%.

About the authors

Oksana Sergeevna Amunova

Federal Agricultural Research Center of the North-East named N.V. Rudnitsky

Author for correspondence.
Email: priemnaya@fanc-sv.ru

candidate of biological sciences, researcher of Spring Wheat Breeding Laboratory

Russian Federation, Kirov

Evgeny Mikhailovich Lisitsin

Vyatka State Agricultural Academy; Federal Agricultural Research Center of the North-East named N.V. Rudnitsky

Email: edaphic@mail.ru

doctor of biological sciences, professor of Ecology and Zoology Department, head of Plant Edaphic Resistance Department

Russian Federation, Kirov; Kirov

References

  1. Croft H., Chen J.M. Leaf pigment content // Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences. Oxford: Elsevier Inc. 2017. P. 1–22. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.10547-0.
  2. Chen M. Chlorophyll Modifications and Their Spectral Extension in Oxygenic Photosynthesis // Annual Review of Biochemistry. 2014. № 83. P. 317–340. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-072711-162943.
  3. Тарасенко С., Живлюк Е. Пигментный состав сортов мягкой озимой пшеницы // Наука и инновации. 2009. № 7 (77). С. 25–28.
  4. Croce R., van Amerongen H. Natural strategies for photosynthetic light harvesting // Nature Chemical Biology. 2014. Vol. 10. P. 492–501. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1555.
  5. Demming-Adams B., Adams W. The role of xanthophylls cycle carotenoids in the protection of photosynthesis // Trends and Plant Science. 1996. Vol. 1. P. 21–27. doi: 10.1016/S1360-1385(96)80019-7.
  6. Reynolds M.P., Balota M., Delgado M.I.B., Amani I., Fischer R.A. Physiological and morphological traits associated with spring wheat yield under hot, irrigated conditions // Australian Journal of Plant Physiology. 1994. Vol. 21. P. 717–730.
  7. Mohammadi M., Karimizadeh R.A., Naghavi M.R. Selection of bread wheat genotypes against heat and drought tolerance based on chlorophyll content and stem reserves // Journal of Agriculture & Social Sciences. 2009. Vol. 5. P. 119–122.
  8. Ristic Z., Bukovnik U., Prasad P.V.V. Correlation between Heat Stability of Thylakoid Membranes and Loss of Chlorophyll in Winter Wheat under Heat Stress // Crop Science. 2007. Vol. 47 (5). P. 2067–2075.
  9. Talebi R. Evaluation of chlorophyll content and canopy temperature as indicators for drought tolerance in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) // Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. 2011. Vol. 5 (11). P. 1457–1462.
  10. Sharifi P., Mohammadkhari N. Effects of drought stress on photosynthesis factors in wheat genotypes during anthesis // Cereal Research Communications. 2015. Vol. 44 (2). P. 1–11.
  11. Cao Z., Mondal S., Cheng D., Wang C., Lui A., Song J., Li H., Zhao Z., Lui J. Evaluation of agronomic and physiological traits associated with high temperature stress tolerance in the winter wheat cultivars // Acta Plant Physiol. 2015. Vol. 37. P. 80–90.
  12. Nahakpam S. Chlorophyll Stability: A Better Trait for Grain Yield in Rice under Drought // Indian Journal of Ecology. 2017. Vol. 44 (Special Issue-4). P. 77–82.
  13. Maglovski M., Gersi Z., Rybansky L., Bardacova M., Moravcikova J., Bujdos M., Dobrikova A., Apostolova E., Kraic J., Blehova A., Matusikova I. Effect of nutrition on wheat photosynthetic pigment responces to arsenic stress // Polish Journal of Environmental Studies. 2019. Vol. 28 (3). P. 1821–1829.
  14. Кобилецька M., Маленька У. Вплив саліцилової кислоти на вміст фотосинтетичних пігментів у рослинах кукурудзи за дії кадмій хлориду // Вісник Львівського університету. Серія біологічна. 2012. Вип. 58. С. 300–308.
  15. Eggink L.L., Park H., Hoober J.K. The role of chlorophyll b in photosynthesis: Hypothesis // BMC Plant Biology. 2001. 1:2.
  16. Strzalka K., Kostecka-Gugala A., Latowski D. Carotenoids and Environmental Stress in Plants: Significance of Carotenoid-Mediated Modulation of Membrane Physical Properties // Russian Journal of Plant Physiology. 2003. Vol. 50, № 2. P. 168–172.
  17. Joshi P.N., Ramaswamy N.K., Iyer R.K. Nair J.S., Pradhan M.K., Gartia S., Biswal B., Biswal U.C. Partial protection of photosynthetic apparatus from UV-B-induced damage by UV-A radiation // Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2007. Vol. 59. P. 166–172. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.11.005.
  18. Ramel F., Birtic S., Cuine S., Triantaphylides C., Ravanat J.-L., Havaux M. Chemical Quenching of Singlet Oxygen by Carotenoids in Plants // Plant Physiology. 2012. Vol. 158. P. 1267–1278.
  19. Lichtenthaler H.K., Buschmann C. Chlorophylls and Carotenoids: Measurement and Characterization by UV-VIS Spectroscopy // eds. R.E. Wrolstad, T.E. Acree, H. An, E.A. Decker, M.H. Penner, D.S. Reid, S.J. Schwartz, C.F. Shoemaker and P. Sporns. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2001. F4.3.1-F4.3.8.
  20. Li Y., Liu C., Zhang J., Yang H., Xu L., Wang Q., Sack L., Wu X., Hou J., He N. Variation in leaf chlorophyll concentration from tropical to cold-temperate forests: association with gross primary productivity // Ecological Indicators. 2018. Vol. 85. P. 383–389.
  21. Junker L.V., Ensminger I. Relationship between leaf optical properties, chlorophyll fluorescence and pigment changes in senescing Acer saccharum leaves // Tree Physiology. 2016. Vol. 36. P. 694–711.

Copyright (c) 2019 Amunova O.S., Lisitsin E.M.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies