Legacy of empires: academic expertise and USA policy in Afghanistan and Iraq in 2001-2014

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The heritage of the European colonial empires should be perceived as «missing dimension» while studying the history of the USA foreign policy at the beginning of the XXI century. The comparative-historical analysis as well as transfers of colonial experience of the European powers should be discussed. It promotes making a fuller picture of imperialism as a phenomenon in the history of international relations as well as a certain style of thinking during a decolonization era. At the same time the American case became the most striking example of reception of the European powers colonial experience in political practice of the 2000th. The main characteristic feature of the USA foreign policy decisions examination was its realization in the form of historical modeling of the asymmetric conflicts - the analysis of Washington policy prospects in Afghanistan and Iraq in a wide context of experience of global colonial empires. While working with such researches a constant methodological reflection caused by their political involvement as well as restrictions of disciplinary character is necessary. At the same time a special role in this case belonged to the academic world representatives who professionally studied colonial experience of the European. It is them who were the most serious competitors to the Pentagon representatives with academic degrees as well as to «think tanks» analysts who cooperated with the military in fight for their own expert opinion domination about historical modeling of the asymmetric conflicts in the Middle East. It is this aspect of the academic examination of the USA policy in Iraq and Afghanistan in 2001-2014 that the following paper deals with.

About the authors

Stanislav Gennadyevich Malkin

Samara State University of Social Sciences and Education

Author for correspondence.
Email: s.g.malkin@mail.ru

doctor of historical sciences, associate professor, head of World History, Law and Methods of Teaching Department

Russian Federation, Samara

References

  1. Gilman N. Mandarins of the Future: modernization theory in Cold War America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003. 344 p.
  2. Heir A., Robinson N. State-Building: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge, 2007. 220 p.
  3. From Nation-Building to State-Building / Ed. by M.T. Berger. London-New York: Routledge, 2008. 211 p.
  4. Simpson B. Economists with Guns: authoritarian development and U.S.-Indonesian relations, 1960-1968. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2008. 376 p.
  5. Kuzmarov J. Modernizing Repression: Police Training, Political Violence, and Nation-Building in the American Century // Diplomatic History. 2009. № 33 (2). P. 191-222.
  6. Badger A. Historians, a legacy of suspicion and the «migrated archives» // Small Wars & Insurgencies. 2012. Vol. 23, № 4-5. P. 799-807.
  7. Mumford A. The Counter-Insurgency Myth: The British Experience of Irregular Warfare. London: Routledge, 2012. 216 p.
  8. Rich P.B. A historical overview of US counter-insurgency // Small Wars & Insurgencies. 2014. Vol. 25, № 1. P. 5-40.
  9. Ucko D.H. Critics gone wild: Counterinsurgency as the root of all evil // Small Wars & Insurgencies. 2014. Vol. 25, № 1. P. 161-179.
  10. Reis B.C. The Myth of British Minimum Force in Counterinsurgency Campaigns during Decolonisation (1945-1970) // Journal of Strategic Studies. 2011. Vol. 34, № 2. P. 245-279.
  11. Porch D. The dangerous myths and dubious promise of COIN // Small Wars & Insurgencies. 2011. Vol. 22, № 2. P. 239-257.
  12. Mockaitis T.R. The minimum force debate: contemporary sensibilities meet imperial practice // Small Wars & Insurgencies. 2012. Vol. 23, № 4-5. P. 762-780.
  13. Jones D.M., Smith M.L.R. Myth and the small war tradition: Reassessing the discourse of British counter-insurgency // Small Wars & Insurgencies. 2013. Vol. 24, № 3. P. 436-464.
  14. Michaels J.H., Ford M. Bandwagonistas: rhetorical redescription, strategic choice and the politics of counter-insurgency // Small Wars & Insurgencies. 2014. Vol. 22, № 2. P. 352-384.
  15. Field Manual, Marine Corps Warfighting Publication 3-33.5 // Counterinsurgency. United States Army Headquarters and United States Marine Corps Combat Development Command. Washington, DC, 15 December 2006.
  16. Hevia J. The Imperial Security State. British Colonial Knowledge and Empire-Building in Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. 304 p.
  17. O'Cadhla S. Civilizing Ireland. Ordnance Survey 1824-1842: Ethnography, Cartography, Translation. Dublin-Portland: Irish academic Press, 2007. 280 p.
  18. Plank G. An Unsettled Conquest: The British Campaign against the Peoples of Acadia. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2001. 239 p.
  19. Plank G. Rebellion and Savagery: The Jacobite Rising of 1745 and the British Empire. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2006. 259 p.
  20. French D. Army, Empire and Cold War: The British Army and Military Policy, 1945-71. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. 346 p.
  21. Thomas M. Empires of Intelligence. Security Services and Colonial Disorder after 1914. Berkeley-Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2008. 428 p.
  22. Walton C. Empire of Secrets: British Intelligence, the Cold War and the Twilight of Empire. London: Harper Press, 2013. 448 p.

Copyright (c) 2019 Malkin S.G.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies