Morphology of Caragana arborescens Lam., introduced in the Volgograd Oblast and the status of its cover herbaceous plant communities

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The study of the shrub status in the South-East of the European Russia is relevant due to the need to maintain the necessary material for protective afforestation. The study of their cover plant communities provides valuable information about the ecological aspects of the introduction and successful adaptation of shrubs in a place of mass planting. The aim of the study was to assess the condition of Caragana arborescens, imported from Eastern Siberia and planted in the arid territories of the Volgograd Oblast, as well as the ecological characteristics of its cover herbaceous plant communities. In the study area we selected two groups of plants, those growing on ordinary soil and on soil with a high content of salts, zinc, and a low content of manganese. In the latter case, C. arborescens had a relatively smaller size, a rarer crown, a reduced ability to generate shoots and resistance to diseases and pests. C. arborescens are sensitive to the anthropogenic stress, but within the analyzed territory this is not accompanied by progressive succession of the ecosystem. Under the crown of C. arborescens at various sites and sites, we found in various phenophases from 8–10 to 24 species of higher sapiens with a predominance of one- and two-year-old forms. Nine species have consistently claimed the role of dominant and subdominant of plant communities, most often representatives of the Asteraceae and Mareaceae families. The discovered communities showed clear signs of anthropogenic impact, but without the development of progressive ecosystem succession.

About the authors

Artyom S. Isakov

Federal Scientific Centre of Agroecology, Complex Melioration and Protective Afforestation of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: isakov-a@vfanc.ru

junior researcher of Biotechnology Laboratory

Russian Federation, Volgograd

Konstantin N. Kulik

Federal Scientific Centre of Agroecology, Complex Melioration and Protective Afforestation of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: kulikk@vfanc.ru

doctor of agricultural sciences, academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, chief researcher of Hydrology of Agroforestry Landscape Laboratory

Russian Federation, Volgograd

References

  1. Зонн И.С., Куст Г.С., Андреева О.В. Парадигма опустынивания: 40 лет развития и глобальных действий // Аридные экосистемы. 2017. № 3 (72). С. 3–16.
  2. Кулик К.Н., Беляев А.И., Пугачёва А.М. Роль защитного лесоразведения в борьбе с засухой и опустыниванием агроландшафтов // Аридные экосистемы. 2023. Т. 29, № 1 (94). С. 4–14.
  3. Крючков С.Н., Маттис Г.Я. Лесоразведение в засушливых условиях. Волгоград: ВНИАЛМИ, 2014. 300 с.
  4. Деградация земель и опустынивание в России: Новейшие подходы к анализу п поиску путей решения / гл. ред. Г.С. Куст. М.: Изд-во Перо, 2019. 235 с.
  5. Lynch A.J. Predictors of tree cover in residential open space: a multi-scale analysis of suburban Philadelphia // Urban Ecosystems. 2022. Vol. 25, № 2. P. 1515–1526.
  6. Виноградова Ю.К., Куклина А.Г. Морфобиологические признаки генеративной сферы некоторых таксонов рода Сaragana fabr. в условиях интродукции // Бюллетень Главного ботанического сада. 2013. № 2 (199). С. 27–31.
  7. Трещевская Э.И., Тихонова Е.Н., Голядкина И.В., Трещевская С.В., Князев В.И. Карагана древовидная (Caragana arborescens Lam.) как кустарниковая порода при биологической рекультивации техногенных ландшафтов // Лесотехнический журнал. 2021. Т. 11, № 3. С. 31–44.
  8. Huang W., Zhao X., Zhao X., Li Y., Lian J. Effects of environmental factors on genetic diversity of Caragana microphylla in Horqin Sandy Land, northeast China // Ecology and Evolution. 2016. Vol. 6, № 22. P. 8256–8266.
  9. Wang Z., Xie L., Prather C.M., Guo H., Han G., Ma C. What drives the shift between sexual and clonal reproduction of Caragana stenophylla along a climatic aridity gradient? // BMC Plant Biology. 2018. Vol. 18, № 1. doi: 10.1186/s12870-018-1313-6.
  10. Иозус А.П., Завьялов А.А., Крючков С.Н. Биоэкологическая характеристика древесных видов в условиях выращивания в сухой степи // Международный журнал прикладных и фундаментальных исследований. 2018. № 10. С. 131–134.
  11. Кулик К.Н., Пугачева А.М. Структура растительных сообществ залежных земель в системе куртинных защитных лесных насаждений в сухих степях // Аридные экосистемы. 2016. Т. 22, № 1 (66). С. 77–85.
  12. Протасова М.В., Проценко Е.П., Петрова И.В., Петров С.С., Сабр С.Ф. Использование методов биоиндикации при исследовании экологического состояния городской среды // Экология урбанизированных территорий. 2019. № 3. С. 136–140.
  13. Тиходеева М.Ю., Лебедева В.Х. Практическая геоботаника. Анализ состава растительных сообществ. СПб.: Изд-во Санкт-Петербургского ун-та, 2015. 166 с.
  14. Hudson L.N., Newbold T., Contu S., Hill S.L.L., Lysenko I., De Palma A., et al. The database of the PREDICTS (Projecting Responses of Ecological Diversity In Changing Terrestrial Systems) project // Ecology and Evolution. 2017. Vol. 7, № 1. P. 145–188.
  15. Маевский П.Ф. Флора средней полосы европейской части России. 11-е изд., испр. и доп. М.: Товарищество научных изданий КМК, 2014. 635 с.
  16. Василевич В.И. Доминантно-флористический подход к выделению растительных ассоциаций // Ботанический журнал. 1995. Т. 80, № 6. С. 28–41.
  17. Егоров С.А., Крючков С.Н., Солонкин А.В., Соломенцева А.С., Романенко А.К., Горбушова Д.А. Особенности адаптации древесных и кустарниковых видов в архиве популяций и клонов насаждений г. Волгограда // Научно-агрономический журнал. 2023. № 3 (122). С. 60–67.
  18. Pugacheva A.M. Climatic fluctuation in dry steppes and their role in the demutation process // Arid Ecosystems. 2020. Vol. 10, iss. 3. P. 181–187. doi: 10.1134/s2079096120030063.
  19. Иванцова Е.А., Новочадов В.В. Характер взаимодействия компонентов антропогенно-трансформированных экосистем Юга России // Известия Нижневолжского агроуниверситетского комплекса. 2019. № 3 (55). С. 79–86.
  20. Cai Y., Zhao M., Shi Y., Khan I. Assessing restoration benefit of grassland ecosystem incorporating preference heterogeneity empirical data from Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region // Ecological Indicators. 2020. Vol. 117. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106705.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Figure 1 – Location of the main experimental site. Inside, ovals highlight areas with changed soil composition

Download (316KB)
3. Figure 2 – Taxation characteristics of Caragana arborescens. Here and in Figure 4, statistically significant differences between forms are marked with an “*”. A – height, B – crown length, C – crown diameter, D – crown volume

Download (99KB)
4. Figure 3 – Top 5 dominants and subdominants of crown plant communities of Caragana arborescens: A – typical soil, B – amended soil

Download (129KB)
5. Figure 4 – Quantitative indicators of crown grass plant communities of Caragana arborescens. A – total PP, B – grass height

Download (52KB)

Copyright (c) 2023 Isakov A.S., Kulik K.N.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies