The concept of «state» in Cicero’s writings

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of ancient Greek and Roman conceptions of a state which had been written at the time prior to Cicero’s; an extent to which Cicero adopts the ideas from those conceptions; Cicero’s usage of the term «state»; differentiation between the concepts res publica and civitas in his writings. Long before Cicero’s times the issue of a state system had been brought up by such philosophers, historians and political figures as Archytas, Hippodamus, Herodotus, Thucydides, Plato, Aristotle, Cato, Polybius and others. They formulated simple state forms (monarchy, aristocracy, democracy) and a mixed form which they considered the best. On the whole, Cicero agrees with the opinion that the mixed form is the best but he also offers original thoughts about the Roman republic as an ideal state and gives many examples from the Roman history. Cicero often denotes the term «a state» by the word res publica implying the meaning of public work, public affairs, public interest, etc. We have analysed the definition res publica est res populi and come to the conclusion that Cicero considers people to be a mandatory participant of the process of state management. Some scholars draw attention to a juridical content of the word res in the above definition considering the term res publica as public property, whereas the Roman republic is an object used by the civil community (civitas Romana). We suppose this point of view is quite relevant. Cicero sees the political and juridical components of the term as a united whole: it was natural for the ancient mentality to regard juridical, political, social and moral components as one. This very approach to the term res publica is given in Cicero’s writings. The article also dwells upon rather a debated question about similarity or difference between Cicero’s concepts res publica and civitas. We subscribe to the opinion that, unlike ancient Greeks who do not separate a state from a community, Cicero knows a difference between the terms, res publica for him is a state form, whereas civitas is a community / citizens. Another thing is that Cicero uses the term res publica to denote the very Roman state; for describing other states or discoursing on abstract states he uses the term civitas. To support the opinion about the difference between the above terms, we would like to quote Cicero himself who writes that the concept «a state» embraces a community (rei publicae nomen universae civitati est) which means that res publica and civitas do not mean the same.

About the authors

Arina Mikhailovna Bragova

Nizhny Novgorod State University of Linguistics

Author for correspondence.
Email: arbra@mail.ru

candidate of historal sciences, associate professor of the Chair of History, Regional Studies and Journalism

Russian Federation, Nizhny Novgorod

References

  1. Büchner K. Die römische Republik im römischen Staatdenken. Freiburg im Breisgau, 1947.
  2. Утченко C.Л. Кризис и падение римской республики. М.: Наука, 1965. 288 с.
  3. Грималь П. Цицерон. М.: Молодая гвардия, 1991. 544 с.
  4. Taeger F. Die Archaeologie des Polybios. Stuttgart, 1922. 164 p.
  5. Утченко С.Л. Идейно-политическая борьба в Риме накануне падения республики. М.: Изд-во АН СССР, 1952. 300 с.
  6. Wood N. Cicero’s Social and Political Thought. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988. 288 p.
  7. Моммзен Т. История Рима. М.: ГОСПОЛИТИЗДАТ, 1941. Т. 3. 258 с.
  8. Maddox G. Constitution // Ball T. Political innovation and conceptual change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989. P. 50-67.
  9. Russell L. Democracy // Ball T. Political innovation and conceptual change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989. P. 68-89.
  10. Тронский И.М. История античной литературы. М.: Высшая школа, 1983. 463 с.
  11. Pöschl V. Römischer Staat und Griechisches Staatsdenken bei Cicero («De republica»). Berlin, 1974. 186 p.
  12. Heuss A. Ciceros Theorie vom römischen Staat. Göttingen, 1976. 80 p.
  13. Beard M. Cicero and Divination: the Formation of a Latin Discourse // Journal of Roman Studies. 1986. Vol. 76. P. 33-46.
  14. Schofield M. Cicero’s Definition of Res Publica // Cicero the Philosopher: 12 Papers. Oxford, «Clarendon Press», 1999. P. 66-83.
  15. Лившиц Г.М. Общественно-политические взгляды Цицерона // Белорусский государственный университет. Ученые записки. Мн.: Белгосуниверситет, 1955. Вып. 23. С. 124-139.
  16. Деревнин А.А. Учение Цицерона о государстве и праве: автореф. … канд. юр. наук. М., 1985. 19 с.
  17. Камалутдинов К.Я. Цицерон и римская диктатура I в. до н.э. // Античная гражданская община. М.: Изд-во МГЗПИ, 1986. С. 68-79.
  18. Брагова А.М. Марк Туллий Цицерон об идеальном гражданине и государстве: дис. … канд. ист. наук. Нижний Новгород, 2005. 257 с.
  19. Темнов Е.И. Цицерон - оратор, политик, правовед // Цицерон. О государстве. О законах. О старости. О дружбе. Об обязанностях. Речи. Письма. М.: Мысль, 1999. С. 5-40.
  20. Breil W. Republik ohne Demagogie. Bochum, 1983. 211 p.
  21. Pahnke E. Studien über Ciceros Kenntnis und Benutzung des Aristoteles und der Herkunft der Staats - definition De rep., I, 39. Freiburg. Diss. Gottingen, 1962. 69 p.
  22. Виппер Р.Ю. Очерки истории Римской империи. Ростов-на-Дону: Феникс, 1995. Т. 1. 480 с.
  23. Suerbaum W. Vom antiken zum frühmittelalterlichen Staatsbegriff. Münster, 1970. 429 p.
  24. Цицерон М.Т. Диалоги. О государстве. О законах. М.: Наука, 1966. 224 с.
  25. Покровский М.М. Толкование трактата Цицерона «De re publica». М.: Типолитография В.И. Витяева, 1913. 152 с.
  26. Утченко С.Л. Политические учения Древнего Рима. М.: Наука, 1977. 256 с.
  27. Камалутдинов К.Я. К характеристике политико-правовых взглядов Цицерона // Из истории социально-этических и политико-правовых идей. Саратов: Изд-во Саратовского педагогического института, 1990. С. 53-71.
  28. Демина С.С. Гражданское сознание и поведение римлян I в. до н.э. Владимир: Изд-во ВлГУ, 2012. 134 с.
  29. Деревнин А.А. Учение Цицерона о происхождении общества, государства и права // Из истории развития политико-правовых идей. М.: Изд-во ИГиП АН СССР, 1984. С. 45-49.
  30. Brunt P.A. The Fall of the Roman Republic. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988. 510 p.

Copyright (c) 2016 Bragova A.M.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies