Vegetation cover and small mammals as the components of biocoenosis in the conditions of the Volga Upland

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The study of the nature reserve «oak forest near the village of Pelya-Khovanskaya» ecosystem was done in the region of Nizhny Novgorod. The investigated wood is unique for its complex structure. It is situated in the forest-steppe zone, characterized by a high species diversity of small mammals and vegetation, which indicates the complexity of trophic and spatial connections. Several series of sample plots were described: 41 of 20×20 m and a number of 1×1 m sites, totaling 300. Abundance of species by Brown-Blanke scale and the number of specimens of adolescence were specified for each 1 sq. m. plot. Mammals were trapped with the help of trapping grooves and transects method. Vegetation cover is characterized by the presence of a clear intra-differentiation as well as the existence of two basic ecologo-coenotic groups/cores - the nemoral (with Pulmonaria obscura Dum. as the center species of the core) and the meadow-fringe. The most distinct group is formed by forest-shoot species. It can be explained by more forest-steppe rather than nemoral nature of vegetation. Small mammals are represented by the following species: common and small shrews, small forest mouse, yellow-throated and field mice and harvest mouse, vole-housekeeper, common, plowed and red voles, European mole. Two species among them - vole-housekeeper and mouse-baby - are listed in the Red Book of the Nizhny Novgorod Region. Matching burrows of mouse-like rodents with soil richness with nitrogen and humidity, two well-defined peaks are observed. The greatest number of burrows is found in places where the soil is high in nitrogen. Moles were found in areas with a large projective coating of Primula veris: coefficient Spearman rank 0,50. There was a negative correlation of the number of moles and vegetation covering of Pyrethrum corymbosum (-0,46), which is the marker of the driest parts in the forest. In general, the nature reserve «oak forest near the village of Pelya-Khovanskaya» is of considerable interest, both from botanical and from zoological point of view. Long-term studies of biocoenosis will allow to monitor the facility and to correct the proposed protective measures.

About the authors

Elena Evgenievna Boryakova

Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod

Author for correspondence.
Email: boryakova@mail.ru

candidate of biological sciences, associate professor of Botany and Zoology Department

Russian Federation

References

  1. Борякова Е.Е., Лямина Н.С. Пространственная структура сообществ мелких млекопитающих и ее связь с фитоценозом // Вестник Оренбургского государственного университета. 2013. № 6 (155). С. 138-142.
  2. Борякова Е.Е. Связь пространственной структуры сообществ мелких млекопитающих и растительного покрова как компонентов биоценоза // Динамика систем, механизмов и машин. 2014. № 6. С. 77-79.
  3. Борякова Е.Е. Характер растительного покрова и распределение мелких млекопитающих в условиях Нижегородского Предволжья // Изучение, сохранение и восстановление естественных ландшафтов. Волгоград: Волгоградское научное издательство. 2014. С. 108-116.
  4. Воротников В.П., Боряков И.В., Борякова Е.Е., Краснобаева О.С. О корреляционной структуре сообществ и инфраценотической организации широколиственных лесов юга Нижегородской области (на примере дубрав Починковского района) // Лесоэкологические проблемы Поволжья. Н. Новгород. 2003. С. 71-79.
  5. Boryakova E.E., Melynik S.A., Sizova O.N. Vegetazione e distribuzione di piccolo mammiferi in Nizhny Novgorod Prima il fiume Volga (Predvolzhye) // Italian Academik and Scientific Journal. 2014. № 3 (12). P. 251-255.
  6. Boryakova E.E., Vorotnikov V.P., Melynik S.A. Ecological Distribution of the Pygmy Filed Mouse (Apodemus uralensis) and Niche Differentiation in Micromammalia Communities of Conifer-Deciduous Forests of the Volga Upland // The 3d the International Conference on Recent Trends in Science and Technology Management. London: SCIEURO, Berforts Information Press Ltd, UK. 2015. P. 38-48.
  7. Кашкаров Д.Н. Основы экологии животных. Л.: Учпедгиз, 1945. 384 с.
  8. Виноградов Б.С., Громов И.М. Грызуны фауны СССР. М.-Л.: Изд-во академии наук СССР, 1952. 296 с.
  9. Башенина Н.В. Пути адаптаций мышевидных грызунов. М.: Наука. 1977. 355 с.
  10. Жигарев И.А. Локальная плотность и индивидуальные участки рыжей полёвки в условиях южного Подмосковья // Зоологический журнал. 2005. № 84 (6). С. 719-727.
  11. Ellenberg H., Weber H., Düll R., Wirth W., Werner W., Paulißen D. Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa // 2nd ed. Scr. Geobot. 1992. V. 18. P. 1-258.
  12. Карасева Е.В., Телицина А.Ю. Методы изучения грызунов в полевых условиях. М.: Наука, 1996. 226 с.
  13. Боряков И.В., Воротников В.П., Борякова Е.Е. Использование информационных технологий для организации фитоценариев и обработки геоботанических данных // Ботанический журнал. 2005. № 90 (1). С. 95-104.
  14. Гланц С. Медико-биологическая статистика. М.: Практика, 1999. 334 с.
  15. King K.L., Homyack J.A., Wigley T.B. et al. Response of rodent community structure and population demographics to intercropping switchgrass within loblolly pine plantations in a forest-dominated landscape // Biomass and Bioenergy. 2014. V. 69. P. 255-264.
  16. Larsen A.L., Homyack J.A., Wigley T.B. et al. Effects of habitat modification on cotton rat population dynamics and rodent community structure // Forest Ecology and Management. 2016. Vol. 376. P. 238-246.
  17. Соловей И.А. Ландшафтные особенности структуры ассоциаций мелких млекопитающих в хвойно-мелколистввенных комплексах северной Беларуси // Териофауна России и сопредельных территорий: мат-лы междунар. совещания VII Съезда Териологического общества при РАН. М.: Товарищество научных изданий КМК, 2003. С. 335.
  18. Zhong W., Wang G., Zhou Q. et al. Spatial niche partitioning of coexisting small mammals in sand dunes // Italian Journ. of Zoology. 2016. V. 83, № 2. P. 248-254.
  19. Porter W., Sabo J., Tracy C. et al. Physiology on a Landscape Scale: Plant-Animal Interactions // Integrative and Comparative Biology. 2002. V. 42(3). P. 431-453.
  20. Root J., Calisher C., Beaty B. Relationships of deer mouse movement, vegetative structure, and prevalence of infection with Sin Nombre virus // Journal of Wildlife Diseases. 1999. V. 35(2). P. 311-318.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Figure 1 - Correlation structure of the studied oak wood vegetation near the village of Pelia-Khovanskaya

Download (64KB)
3. Figure 2 - Percentage proportion of individuals of mouse-like rodents in an oak forest near the village of Pelia-Khovanskaya (2nd half of summer, 2004)

Download (15KB)

Copyright (c) 2017 Boryakova E.E.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies