Methodological features of asymmetric conflicts historical modeling studying

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The following paper deals with methodological features of studying of empires legacy role in policy of the leading powers in the countries of «the third world» through a prism of asymmetric conflicts historical modeling. The author pays special attention to the role of Great Britain and the USA foreign policy course defining after World War II during «Cold War» in the second half of the 20th century and «Global War on Terror» at the beginning of the 21st century. The author pays attention to methodological traps (such as the probability of the research problem on the given variable and terminological confusion) as well as to research opportunities which are opened by such approach in the field of the historical and political analysis (for example, evolution of the international relations theory and practice in the conditions of the world order transformation after World War II). Special attention is given to the value of such methodological reception as asymmetric conflicts historical modeling in expert estimates of the leading powers foreign policy. The paper also deals with the role of expert community and academic expertize as an important component of that analytical operation which is carried out within historical simulation of the asymmetrical conflicts.

About the authors

Stanislav Gennadyevich Malkin

Samara State University of Social Sciences and Education

Author for correspondence.
Email: s.g.malkin@mail.ru

doctor of historical sciences, associate professor, head of World History, Law and Methods of Teaching Department

Russian Federation, Samara

References

  1. Westad A.O. The Global Cold War: Third World Interventions and the Making of our Times. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. 484 p.
  2. Черчилль У. «Мускулы мира». Речь 5 марта 1946 г. в Фултоне // Мировой кризис / У. Черчилль. М.: Эксмо, 2003. 768 с.
  3. Фергюсон Н. Империя. Чем современный мир обязан Британии. М.: Аст: CORPUS, 2013. 560 с.
  4. Cooper R. The Post-modern State and the world order. London: Demos, 2002. 43 p.
  5. Ferguson N. Colossus: The Price of America’s Empire. New York: Penguin Press, 2004. 384 p.
  6. Малкин С.Г. Колониальный опыт и стратегическое мышление США // Международные процессы. Т. 14, № 3 (46). Июль - сентябрь. 2016. С. 52-67.
  7. Дериглазова Л. Асимметричный конфликт в современной американской политологии // Международные процессы. Т. 8, № 2 (23). Май - август 2010. С. 51-64.
  8. Plank G. Rebellion and Savagery: The Jacobite Rising of 1745 and the British Empire. Philadelphia, 2006. 259 p.
  9. Hevia J. The Imperial Security State. British Colonial Knowledge and Empire-Building in Asia. Cambridge, 2012. 304 p.
  10. Thomas M. Empires of Intelligence. Security Services and Colonial Disorder after 1914. Berkeley and Los Angeles, 2008. 428 p.

Copyright (c) 2018 Malkin S.G.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies