Digital reform of higher education: implementation experience

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The study examines the existing experience in implementing digital reform in higher educational system, and outlines the prospects for its further development. The philosophical and pedagogical issues of different approaches to implementing educational trajectories and customized lifelong educational routes are tackled and substantiated. The main aim of underpinning the existing steps of implementing the reform is proved to be the advancement of student self-development. The practical significance of the research lies in the attempts of designing a matrix of competencies underpinning the possibility of building up individual educational routes. The main results comprise the introduction of 16 main industries of higher education for the future. Further development of this topic is seen in the study of the interdisciplinary and cultural aspects of interaction in the educational process, implemented in digital management of the stated industries, such as Industry of Cognition, Industry of Thinking and Design, Industry of Health Preservation, Industry of Knowledge, Neuro Industry, Industry of Management, Industry of Law, Industry of Culture, Industry of Hospitality, Industry of Territories, Industry of High Technologies, Industry of Logistics, Industry of Production Systems, Industry of Resource Conservation and Efficiency, Industry of Research, Industry of Transfer, Industry of Social Initiatives.

About the authors

Aleksandr Aleksandrovich Fedorov

Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University

Email: alafedorov@kantiana.ru

doctor of philosophical sciences, professor, rector

Russian Federation, Kaliningrad

Anna Olegovna Budarina

Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University

Email: annabudarina@mail.ru

doctor of pedagogical sciences, professor, director of Institute of Education, professor of Institute of Education

Russian Federation, Kaliningrad

Ksenia Leonidovna Polupan

Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University

Email: kpolupan@kantiana.ru

doctor of pedagogical sciences, associate professor, deputy director of Project Office

Russian Federation, Kaliningrad

Dmitriy Gennadievich Zhitinevich

Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University

Author for correspondence.
Email: dzhitinevich@kantiana.ru

candidate of juridical sciences, associate professor, director of Project Office

Russian Federation, Kaliningrad

References

  1. Eagle L., Brennan R. Are students customers? TQM and marketing perspectives // Quality Assurance in Education. 2007. Vol. 15, № 1. P. 44-60. doi: 10.1108/09684880710723025.
  2. Колесникова И.А. Постпедагогический синдром эпохи цифромодернизма // Высшее образование в России. 2019. Т. 28, № 8-9. С. 67-82. doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-8-9-67-82.
  3. Machlup F. Knowledge industries and knowledge occupations // Economics of Education. Research and Studies. 1987. P. 14-21. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-033379-3.50010-3.
  4. Scott P. Postmodernity and the university // Revista Española de Educación Comparada. 2012. № 20. P. 81-107. doi: 10.5944/reec.20.2012.7594.
  5. An introduction to the higher education industry // Mission and money: understanding the university / B.A. Weisbrod, J.P. Ballou, E.D. Asch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020. P. 1-10.
  6. McGreal R. Special report on the role of open educational resources in supporting the sustainable development. Goal 4: quality education challenges and opportunities // The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2017. Vol. 18 (7). P. 292-305.
  7. Аксёнов С.И., Арифулина Р.У., Катушенко О.А., Сергеева Т.Н., Романовская Л.В. Цифровая трансформация образовательного пространства: новые инструменты и технологические решения // Перспективы науки и образования. 2021. № 1 (49). С. 24-43. doi: 10.32744/pse.2021.1.2.
  8. Киященко Л.П., Тищенко П.Д. Новый тип производства знаний и проблема ответственности в биологии и медицине XXI века // Философские науки. 2010. № 12. С. 38-41.
  9. Mishra S. Open educational resources: removing barriers from within // Distance Education. 2017. Vol. 38 (3). P. 369-380. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2017.1369350.
  10. Rufai A.U., Bin Bakar A.R., Mat Rashid A. Business, industry and higher education collaboration: a panacea in developing professional work-ready graduates // Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. 2015. Vol. 6, № 6. doi: 10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n6p512.
  11. Turner L. Metamodernism: a brief introduction [Internet] // Notes on Metamodernism. 2015. https://www.berfrois.com/2015/01/everything-always-wanted-know-metamodernism.
  12. Zinchenko V.V. Global institutional transformations and the prospects of sustainable development of society in the context of the internationalization of higher education // Перспективы науки и образования, 2020. № 2 (44). P. 10-18. doi: 10.32744/pse.2020.2.1.
  13. DeBrock L. The new face-to-face education scalable live-engagement // Educational Studies Moscow. 2018. № 4. P. 44-59. doi: 10.17323/1814-9545-2018-4-44-59.
  14. Keyek-Franssen D. Practices for student success: from face-to-face to at-scale and back // Educational Studies Moscow. 2018. № 4. P. 116-138. doi: 10.17323/1814-9545-2018-4-116-138.
  15. Akimova E.I., Madzhuga A.G., Shurupova R.V., Bueverova E.L. New understanding of health and a healthy lifestyle: a holistic and existential-humanistic approach // Perspectives of Science and Education. 2020. № 47 (5). P. 10-21. doi: 10.32744/pse.2020.5.1.
  16. Гамукин В.В. Индивидуальные образовательные маршруты в вузе // Инженерное образование. 2019. № 25. С. 27-36.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Figure 1 – The synergetic essence of the process of choice

Download (189KB)

Copyright (c) 2022 Fedorov A.A., Budarina A.O., Polupan K.L., Zhitinevich D.G.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies