Anthropological aspects of the problem of immortality in modern science fiction literature

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The paper deals with the peculiarities of the interpretation of the problem of immortality in the English-language science fiction literature of the late 20th – 21st centuries. On the example of the works of R. Sawyer, P. Watts, G. Egan, N. Stevenson, V. Vinge, the author analyzes various ways of considering anthropological aspects of the problem of immortality in science fiction, related to the rethinking of the goals and meaning of existence in the case of the implementation of a transhumanist project to extend the human life. The author concludes that in modern science fiction the theme of immortality is presented in the form of two main options: physical immortality, which implies the impossibility of separating human consciousness from the brain as its material carrier, and digital immortality, associated with a hypothetical technology for scanning consciousness and moving it into a virtual world. Considering these options for immortality, science fiction writers discover in them both technological and humanitarian problems: firstly, it is the unattainability of real immortality, associated with the finiteness of the existence of the universe and (in the second version) with the technical impossibility of eternally ensuring the functioning of the virtual world. Secondly, this is the problem of the semantic fullness of immortal existence, recognized by all the listed writers, associated with the need for a person to set new long-term goals, and, in the case of digital immortality, the problem of rethinking by a person who has turned into pure consciousness, his own nature and acceptance of virtual reality as the only option for him. In general, the ways of revealing the theme of immortality in modern science fiction literature make it possible to see in the transhumanist concepts of immortality a serious anthropological problem related to the fact that the improvement of a person’s physical and intellectual abilities will have to entail a change in his consciousness and self-awareness, but to predict the character and the result of such changes is much more difficult than to predict the results of physical modifications of the human body.

About the authors

Irina Borisovna Kazakova

Samara State University of Social Sciences and Education

Author for correspondence.
Email: kib_sam@mail.ru

doctor of philological sciences, professor of Philosophy, History and Theory of World Culture Department

Russian Federation, Samara

References

  1. Шелер М. Положение человека в Космосе // Проблема человека в западной философии: переводы / сост. П.С. Гуревич; общ. ред. Ю.Н. Попова. М.: Прогресс, 1988. С. 31-95.
  2. Bostrom N. A history of transhumanism thought // Journal of Evolution & Technology. 2005. Vol. 14 (1). P. 1-30.
  3. Krueger O. Gnosis in cyberspace? Body, mind and progress in posthumanism // Journal of Evolution and Technology. 2005. Vol. 14 (2). P. 77-89.
  4. Дёмин И.В. Бессмертие как проект: смерть и бессмертие человека в контексте гуманистического и трансгуманистического типов мировоззрения // Онтология проектирования. 2013. № 4. С. 7-17.
  5. Виндж В. Грядущая технологическая сингулярность: как выжить в постчеловеческую эпоху // Виндж В. Сингулярность: сб. / пер. с англ. М. Левина, В. Гришечкина. М.: Аст, 2019. С. 3-37.
  6. Sawyer R.J. Rollback. New York: A Tor Book, 2008. 320 p.
  7. Sawyer R.J. Flashforward. New York: A Tor Book, 2014. 305 p.
  8. Sawyer R.J. Starplex. New York: Ace Books, 1996. 304 с.
  9. Уоттс П. Огнепад: Ложная слепота. Зеро. Боги насекомых. Полковник. Эхопраксия / пер. с англ. Д. Смушковича, Н. Кудрявцева. М.: Аст, 2020. 908 с.
  10. Уоттс П. Революция в стоп-кадрах / пер. с англ. Н. Кудрявцева, В. Женевского. М.: Аст, 2021. 347 с.
  11. Sawyer R.J. The terminal experiment. Toronto: Penguin Canada, 2009. 273 p.
  12. Egan G. Permutation city. New York: HarperPrism, 1994. 341 p.
  13. Egan G. Border guards // Egan G. Oceanic. London: Gollancz, 2009. P. 261-287.
  14. Виндж В. Куки-монстр // Виндж В. Сингулярность: сб. / пер. с англ. М. Левина, В. Гришечкина. М.: Аст, 2019. С. 63-218.
  15. Стивенсон Н. Падение, или Додж в аду. Книга первая / пер. с англ. Е. Доброхотовой-Майковой. М.: Эксмо, 2020. 544 с.
  16. Долин В.А. Трансгуманистические представления о человеке в современном антропологическом дискурсе // Знание. Понимание. Умение. 2017. № 4. С. 133-144.

Copyright (c) 2022 Kazakova I.B.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies