Genetic markers of domestication (some features of interpretation of laboratory data of paleogenetic researches)

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The paper reviews the findings of two research groups, published in the journal «Nature», that focus on the genetic aspects of horses’ domestication in the Bronze Age. Creating coherence and overcoming the contradictions between the data of paleogenetics and archeology through meta-description, which is based on the prevalence of selection, turns into the some controversial conclusions, including: extrapolation caused by the transfer of anthropomorphic characteristics to the physiological characteristics of the horse and the reduction of actors of social processes to genetic markers. In the context of articles on medical genetics and sociology of science, it is proposed to overcome controversies through a change in the optics of analysis of genetic data in the problem of domestication: rejection of the meta-description of the researching phenomena and the actualization of the logic of «meeting» social needs and mutational variability preceding domestication. In addition, the paper deals with the problem of interpreting the genetic data of horse domestication only as a hypothesis. The problem is that there is a significant chronological gap of 500–700 years between genetic ancestors and genuine domestic horses (Dom-2). This period includes such significant archaeological cultures as Abashevskaya, post-Poltavka Volga-Ural and others.

About the authors

Pavel Fedorovich Kuznetsov

Samara State University of Social Sciences and Education

Email: pavelf.kpf.kuznetsov@gmail.com

candidate of historical sciences, associate professor, head of Museum of Archeology of the Volga Region

Russian Federation, Samara

Sergey Vladimirovich Fomenko

Samara State University of Social Sciences and Education

Author for correspondence.
Email: fomenko.f2013@yandex.ru

non-staff researcher of Museum of Archeology of the Volga Region

Russian Federation, Samara

References

  1. Latour B., Woolgar S. Laboratory life. The social construction of scientific facts. London: Sage Publications; Beverly Hills: Calif, 1979. 272 p.
  2. Librado P., Khan N., Fages A. et al. The origins and spread of domestic horses from the Western Eurasian steppes // Nature. 2021. Vol. 598. P. 634-640. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04018-9.
  3. Wilkin Sh., Miller A.V., Fernandes R. et al. Dairying enabled Early Bronze Age Yamnaya steppe expansions // Nature. 2021. Vol. 598. P. 629-633. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03798-4.
  4. Gaunitz C., Fages A., Hanghøj K. et al. Ancient genomes revisit the ancestry of domestic and Przewalski’s horses // Science. 2018. Vol. 360 (6384). P. 111-114. doi: 10.1126/science.aao3297.
  5. Кореневский С.Н., Калмыков А.А. Майкопские погребения кургана 22 могильника Айгурский-2 // Российская археология. 2017. № 4. С. 106-124.
  6. Suri P., Palmer M.R., Tsepilov Ya.A. et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis of 158,000 individuals of European ancestry identifies three loci associated with chronic back pain // PLoS Genetics. 2018. Vol. 14. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007601.
  7. Jiang H., Moro A., Liu Y., Wang J., Meng D., Zhan X., Wei Q. Two GWAS-identified variants are associated with lumbar spinal stenosis and Gasdermin-C expression in Chinese population // Scientific Reports. 2020. Vol. 10. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78249-7.
  8. Horse Anatomy: Clinical atlas / ed. T. McCracken, R. Kainer. Lovеland: Alpine Publication, 1998. 181 p.
  9. Luria A.R. The neuropsychology of memory. New York: Halsted Press, 1976. 372 p.
  10. Bergson H. Creative evolution. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1911. 407 p.
  11. Yoxen E.J. Constructing genetic diseases // The problem of medical knowledge: examining the social construction of medicine / ed. P. Wright, A. Treacher. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1982. P. 144-161.
  12. Kerr A. (Re)constructing genetic disease: the clinical continuum between cystic fibrosis and male infertility // Social Studies of Science. 2000. Vol. 30, iss. 6. P. 847-894. doi: 10.1177/030631200030006002.
  13. Grubhoffer V. Pod závojem smrti: Poslední věci Schwarzenbergů v letech 1732-1914. České Budějovice: Společnost pro kulturní dějiny, 2013. 444 p.
  14. Holden C., Mace R. Phylogenetic analysis of the evolution of lactose digestion in adults // Human Biology. 2009. Vol. 81 (5-6). P. 597-619. doi: 10.3378/027.081.0609.
  15. Mace R. Update to Holden and Mace's «Phylogenetic analysis of the evolution of lactose digestion in adults» (1997): Revisiting the coevolution of human cultural and biological diversity // Human Biology. 2009. Vol. 81 (5/6). P. 621-624. doi: 10.3378/027.081.0610.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Figure 1 – Map of ancestral monuments of domestic horses and the area of monuments of the block of charioteers and horse breeding cultures. Eneolithic monuments: Semenovka 1 (DNA profile Ukr 11); Irrigated (DNA profile NEONCAS). Monuments of the Early and Middle Bronze Age: Aigursky-2, K. 22, P. 16 (DNA profile C-PONT); Repin Khutor (DNA profile C-PONT, RepinAdmix); Sosnovka (DNA profile C-PONT); Turganik (DNA profile TURG)

Download (1MB)
3. Figure 2 – Radiocarbon chronology of cultures of the Volga-Ural region (supplemented by the presence/absence of horse DNA samples). Note. Cultures with an established DNA profile of horses are highlighted in italics. Sintashta, Potapovskaya and Pokrovskaya cultures with the DNA profile of horses DOM-2

Download (437KB)

Copyright (c) 2022 Kuznetsov P.F., Fomenko S.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies