Peculiarities of Hypericum perforatum L. reproduction in vitro culture and development of plants in the open field

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The possibility of using the method of cell and tissue culture for microclonal reproduction of St. John’s wort is shown. Direct morphogenesis was obtained using seedlings without roots at the age of 12 days. It was found that the introduction of BAP in a low concentration (0,1 mg/l) with IAA 1,0 mg/l into the MS nutrient medium promoted the minimum bud formation with the maximum yield of morphologically normal shoots without the need for an elongation phase. At the stage of rhizogenesis, the process of root formation was observed in all variants of the experiment; the proportion of shoots with roots was high and ranged from 88 to 90%. The maximum height of shoots, the number of pairs of leaves per shoot, and the length of plant roots were reached on the MS nutrient medium with IAA 1,0 mg/l. The period of adaptation to non-sterile conditions was 30 days, while a high yield of regenerant plants was observed. The survival rate of the adapted regenerant plants in field conditions was high (100%). Regenerant plants developed rapidly and bloomed in the first year. It was revealed that before planting in open ground, St. John’s wort plants propagated in vitro culture and passed the stage of adaptation to non-sterile conditions in containers with soil mixture formed a sufficiently developed root system from regenerant plants with a large number of adventitious roots 6–8 cm long. At the base of the shoot, from 2 to 5 renewal shoots 9–12 cm in height were formed. On the 65th day after transplanting, the number of renewal shoots more than doubled and averaged 7,8 pcs. per individual with a shoot height of 23 cm. In the third decade of August, the plants entered the budding phase, and on September 20, they entered the flowering phase. It was noted that by the beginning of flowering, the height of the plants increased to 49–54 cm, and the diameter of the shoot – up to 0,4 cm. From 16 to 24 pairs of oblong-ovoid standard leaves were formed on the plant. The formation of the floral part of the shoot (inflorescence) 20–27 cm long began with the axils of 9–14 leaves and consisted of 7–10 pairs of lateral axes (paracladia). The average number of flowers was 82. The amplitude of variability of the main morphological traits of the shoot of the studied plants was at low and medium levels. It was found that the development of microclonally propagated plants by the end of the first growing season corresponded to the growth and development of St. John’s wort plants of the second year of life grown by seedlings.

About the authors

Zhanna Eduardovna Mikhovich

Institute of Biology of Komi Scientific Centre of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: mihovich@ib.komisc.ru

candidate of biological sciences, senior researcher of Botanical Garden

Russian Federation, Syktyvkar

Elmira Elizbarovna Echishvili

Institute of Biology of Komi Scientific Centre of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: elmira@ib.komisc.ru

candidate of biological sciences, researcher of Botanical Garden

Russian Federation, Syktyvkar

Nadezhda Vasilyevna Portnyagina

Institute of Biology of Komi Scientific Centre of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: portniagina@ib.komisc.ru

candidate of agricultural sciences, associate professor, senior researcher of Botanical Garden

Russian Federation, Syktyvkar

Olga Valerievna Skrotskaya

Institute of Biology of Komi Scientific Centre of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: skrockaja@ib.komisc.ru

candidate of biological sciences, head of Botanical Garden

Russian Federation, Syktyvkar

References

  1. Черепанов С.К. Сосудистые растения России и сопредельных государств. СПб.: Мир и семья, 1995. 990 с.
  2. Махлаюк В.П. Лекарственные растения в народной медицине. Саратов: Приволжск. кн. изд-во, 1993. 544 с.
  3. Patočka L. The chemistry, pharmacology and toxicology of the biologically active constituents of the herb of Hypericum perforatum L. // Journal of Applied Biomedicine. 2003. № 1. P. 61–70.
  4. Куркин В.А., Правдивцева О.Е., Дубищев А.В. и др. Исследование сырья и препаратов зверобоя // Фармация. 2005. Т. 53, № 3. С. 23–25.
  5. Куркин В.А., Правдивцева О.Е. Сравнительное исследование содержания суммы флавоноидов и антраценпроизводных в препаратах травы зверобоя // Химико-фармацевтический журнал. 2008. Т. 42, № 10. С. 39–42.
  6. Куркин В.А., Правдивцева О.Е., Зимина Л.Н., Дубищев А.В., Булачкин Д.Г., Корчагина Д.В. Актуальные аспекты создания новых нейротропных фитопрепаратов // Фармация. 2009. № 1 (6). С. 46–49.
  7. Butterweck V., Petereit F., Winterhoff H. et al. Solubilized hypericin and pseudohypericin from Hypericum perforatum exert antidepressant activity in the forced swimming test // Planta Medica. 1998. Vol. 64, № 4. P. 291–294.
  8. Stevinson C., Ernst E. Hypericum for depression. An update of the clinical evidence // European Neuropsychopharmacology. 1999. Vol. 9 (6). P. 501–505.
  9. Woelk H. Comparison of St John's wort and imipramine for treating depression: randomised controlled trial // British Medical Journal. 2000. Vol. 321 (7260). P. 536–539.
  10. Bjerkenstedt L., Edman G.V., Alken R.G., Mannel M. Hypericum extract LI 160 and fluoxetine in mild to moderate depression a randomized, placebo-controlled multi-center study in outpatients // European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience. 2005. № 255. P. 40–47. doi: 10.1007/s00406-004-0532-Z.
  11. Schinazi R.F., Chu C.K., Babu J.R., Oswald B.J., Saalmann V., Cannon D.L., Eriksson B.F.H., Nasr M. Anthraquinones as a new class of antiviral agents against human immunodeficiency virus // Antiviral Research. 1990. Vol. 13. P. 265–270.
  12. Agostinis P., Vantieghem A., Merlevede W., Witte P.A.M. Hypericin in cancer treatment: more light on the way // The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology. 2002. Vol. 34. P. 221–241.
  13. Silva R., Tilker H.A., Cecil J.T. et al. Open-label study of dexmeth-ylphenidate hydrochloride in children and adolescents with attention defi cit hyperactivity disorder // Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology. 2004. Vol. 14. P. 555–556.
  14. Silva B.A., Ferreres F., Malva J.O., Dias A.C.P. Phytochemical and antioxidant characterization of Hypericum perforatum alcoholic extracts // Food Chem. 2005. Vol. 90. P. 157–167.
  15. Yadollah-Damavandi S., Chavoshi-Nejad M., Jangholi E., Nekouyian N., Hosseini S., Seifaee A. et al. Topical Hypericum perforatum improves tissue regeneration in full-thickness excisional wounds in diabetic rat model // Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2015. Vol. 4. doi: 10.1155/2015/245328.
  16. Trautmann-Sponsel R.D., Dienel A. Safety of Hypericum extract in mildly to moderately depressed outpatients – a review based on data from three randomized, placebo-controlled trials // Journal of Affective Disorders. 2004. Vol. 82. P. 303–307. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2003.12.017.
  17. Pretto F.R., Santarem E.R. Callus formation and plant regeneration from Hypericum perforatum L. leaves // Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture. 2000. Iss. 67. P. 107–113.
  18. Ayan A.K., Çirak C., Kevseroglu K., Sökmen A. Effects of explant types and different concentrations of sucrose and phytoharmones on plant regeneration and hypericin content in Hypericum perforatum L. // Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 2005. Vol. 29. P. 197–204.
  19. Hou W., Shkya P., Franklin G. A perspective on Hypericum perforatum genetic transformation // Frontiers in Plant Science. 2016. Vol. 7 (265). P. 879. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00879.
  20. Mir M.Ya., Kamili A.N., Hassan Q.P., Rafi S., Parray J.A., Jan S. In vitro regeneration and free radical scavenging assay of Hypericum perforatum // National Academy Science Letters. 2019. Vol. 42 (7260). P. 161–167. doi: 10.1007/s40009-018-0699-x.
  21. Гуликова А.А., Тихомирова Л.И., Кушнир Е.Ю. Особенности культивирования in vitro зверобоя продырявленного (Hypericum perforatum L.) и фитохимический состав его экстрактов // Технологии и оборудование химической, биотехнологической и пищевой промышленности: мат-лы XII всерос. науч.-практ. конф. студентов, аспирантов и молодых ученых с междунар. участием. Бийск, 22–24 мая 2019 г. Бийск: Алтайский государственный технический университет им. И.И. Ползунова, 2019. С. 391–396.
  22. Овчинникова В.Н., Карсункина Н.П., Харченко П.Н. Влияние условий культивирования на морфофизиологическую активность и содержание фенольных соединений зверобоя продырявленного (Hypericum perforatum L.) в культуре in vitro // Химия растительного сырья. 2018. № 3. С. 223–229.
  23. Бутенко Р.Г. Культура изолированных тканей и физиология морфогенеза растений: автореф. дис. … д-ра биол. наук. М., 1964. 42 с.
  24. Катаева Н.В., Бутенко Р.Г. Клональное микроразмножение растений. М.: Наука, 1983. 96 с.
  25. Калинин В.Ф., Кушнир Г.П., Сарнацкая В.В. Технология микроклонального размножения растений. Киев: Наукова Думка, 1992. 227 с.
  26. Murashige Т., Skoog F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures // Physiologia Plantarum. 1962. Vol. 15 (3). P. 473–497.
  27. Майсурадзе Н.И., Киселев В.П., Черкасов О.А., Нухимовский Е.Л., Тихонова В.Л., Макарова Н.В., Угнивенко В.В. Методика исследований при интродукции лекарственных растений // Лекарственное растениеводство. Вып. 3. М., 1984. С. 1–33.
  28. Мамаев С.А. Основные принципы методики исследования внутривидовой изменчивости древесных растений // Индивидуальная и эколого-географическая изменчивость растений: сб. ст. Свердловск, 1975. С. 3–14.
  29. Зайцев Г.Н. Методика биометрических расчетов. М.: Наука, 1973. 256 с.
  30. Fascella G., Airò M., Mammano M., Giardina G., Carrubba A., Lazzara S. Rooting and acclimatization of micropropagated Hypericum perforatum L. native to Sicily // Acta Horticulturae. 2017. Vol. 1155. P. 543–548. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1155.80.
  31. Эчишвили Э.Э., Портнягина Н.В., Пунегов В.В., Зайнуллина К.С. Зверобой продырявленный (Hypericum perforatum L.) в культуре на европейском Северо-Востоке / отв. ред. Г.Н. Табаленкова. Сыктывкар: Коми НЦ УрО РАН, 2014. 120 с.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Figure 1 - Actually micropropagation of St. John's wort on the medium: A - MS + BAP 1.0 + IAA 0.1 mg/l; B - MS + BAP 0.1 + IAA 1.0 mg/l

Download (399KB)
3. Figure 2 - St. John's wort rhizogenesis. A – MS + IAA 1.0 mg/l; B - MS without hormones; C – MS + IBA 1.0 mg/l

Download (495KB)
4. Figure 3 - Plants-regenerated on the 10th day of cultivation

Download (99KB)

Copyright (c) 2021 Mikhovich Z.E., Echishvili E.E., Portnyagina N.V., Skrotskaya O.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies