Variability and dynamics of patriotic attitudes of Russians in the context of Special military operation

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The article presents the results of a study of the features of socio-political dispositions characteristic of moderate and convinced types of patriotic attitudes. Additionally, an analysis of the dynamics of changes in the ratio of the shares of both types of patriotism in 2024 in the context of SMO in comparison with the situation in 2020 was carried out. The empirical basis of the study was data from a mass survey of the population of the Russian Federation conducted by the Institute of Sociology of FCTAS in February-March 2024 on a representative all-Russian sample. The sample size is 2000 respondents. For comparison, data from a similar survey in 2020 were used. The criterion for typologizing different variants of patriotism is the quantitative difference in the degree of support for judgments of a civil and protective nature, forming a space of patriotic meanings of emotional, cognitive and behavioral aspects of attitude towards Russia. Based on the results of the analysis of data on the assessment of the degree of agreement with judgments of civil and protective meaning, moderate and convinced types of patriotism were identified, which together make up the system of patriotic attitudes of Russians. An analysis of the interrelationships of each type of patriotism with a wide range of socio-political dispositions has shown that the selected types represent integral symptom complexes of views on the country, its current state and development prospects, significantly differing in their stable trends over time. Such a trend for convinced patriots is a focus on traditionalism, and for moderate patriots – on modernism. A comparison of data on the prevalence of a particular type of patriotism in 2020 with similar data in 2024 allowed us to conclude that if in 2020 the system of patriotic attitudes of Russians was in a stable state with the dominance of modernist trends, then in 2024 there was a “shift” of the entire system of patriotic beliefs to a different quality, but equally stable a state, but already dominated by traditionalist tendencies. In general, it is concluded that the system of patriotic attitudes of Russians is very mobile in terms of activating both civil and protective meanings, which in different socio-political contexts leads either to an increase or decrease in the proportion of supporters of one or another of the studied types in the system as a whole.

About the authors

Igor M. Kuznetsov

Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS

Email: ingvar31@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6914-3355
SPIN-code: 7071-5076
ResearcherId: I-5636-2013
Candidate of Sociology, Leading Researcher Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Schatz R. T., Staub E., Lavine H. On the varieties of national attachment: Blind versus constructive patriotism // Political Psychology. 1999. № 20. Р. 151–175. doi: 10.1111/0162-895X.00140.
  2. Huddy L., Khatib N. American Patriotism, National Identity, and Political Involvement // American Journal of Political Science. 2007. Vol. 51, № 1. P. 63–77. doi: 10.1111/j.15405907.2007.00237.x.
  3. Kosterman R., Feshbach S. Toward measure of patriotic and nationalistic attitudes // Political Psychology. 1989. Vol. 10, № 2. P. 257–274. doi: 10.2307/3791647.
  4. Григорян Л. К. Патриотизм и национализм в России: механизмы влияния на экономическую самостоятельность // Культурно-историческая психология. 2013. Т. 9, № 3. С. 22–30. doi: 10.17759/chp. EDN RZTSNH.
  5. Российское общество и вызовы времени. Книга вторая / М. К. Горшков [и др.] ; отв. ред. М. К. Горшков, В. В. Петухов. М. : Издательство Весь Мир, 2015. 432 с. ISBN 9785-7777-0604-1. EDN VNKUTL.
  6. Российская идентичность и межэтнические отношения. Публичный дискурс и социальная практика / Л. М. Дробижева, Е. М. Арутюнова, М. А. Евсеева [и др.] ; отв. ред. И. М. Кузнецов, С. В. Рыжова. М. : ФНИСЦ РАН, 2022. 434 с. ISBN 978-5-89697-4048, doi: 10.19181/monogr.978-5-89697-404-8.2022. EDN WGDKYE.
  7. Эриксон Э. Идентичность: юность и кризис / Э. Эриксон ; общ. ред. и предисл. А. В. Толстых ; пер. с англ. М. : Прогресс, 1996. 340 с.
  8. Кузнецов И. М. Основания ценностной консолидации россиян: традиционализм и обновление // Социологические исследования. 2021. № 8. С. 93–102. doi: 10.31857/S013216250014161-0. EDN NZOFWE.
  9. Информационно-аналитический бюллетень (ИНАБ). Межнациональные отношения, гражданская идентичность и интеграционные процессы в полиэтническом пространстве России. 2023. № 1. 135 с. doi: 10.19181/INAB.2023.1. EDN XZMCKE.
  10. Халий И. А. Патриотизм в России: опыт типологизации // Социологические исследования. 2017. № 2 (394). С. 67–74 EDN YGAMSJ.
  11. Тихонова Н. Е. Специфика мировоззрения сторонников западного пути развития для России в массовых слоях населения // Мир России. 2023. Т. 32, № 4. С. 6–35. doi: 10.17323/1811-038X-2023-32-4-6-35. EDN NQSIBT.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).