Analysis of industrial practice of drug quality risk management in russian pharmaceutical enterprises

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The aim of the research was to study the current industrial practice of drug quality risk management in Russian pharmaceutical enterprises, including the assessment of the main problems during the implementation of the risk management system and its compliance with the accepted international approaches.

Materials and methods. In the period from 6 April to 10 May 2020, an online survey of the leading employees in the field of quality assurance of Russian manufacturers was conducted. In the survey, the questionnaire was based on the results of the authors’ analysis of the national regulatory legal acts of the Russian Federation, the European Union countries, international guidelines of the EAEU, ICH and WHO in this area. 111 people took part in the survey, the return of questionnaires was 11.5%.

Results. The data obtained indicate the prevalence of a superficial approach to quality risk management in the Russian pharmaceutical industry, the presence of objective and subjective reasons that hinder the effective implementation of these methods, the fragmentation of the systems used and, in most cases, their ineffective use. The respondents believe that the most significant reasons for the difficulties in implementing this methodology, are the lack of recommendations from the Ministry of Industry and Trade of Russia on creating an effective quality risk management system and a shortage of the specialists who are ready to work in the area of this industry. The survey revealed rather large gaps in the deployment of a risk management system at the enterprise and separation from the established international practice.

Conclusions. The data obtained indicate the extreme urgency of developing recommendations for a quality risk management system, which should be based upon and supported by Russian regulatory legal acts and international experience in this area. The authors propose highlights for these recommendations.

About the authors

Anna B. Kashirina

First Moscow State Medical University named after I.M. Sechenov

Author for correspondence.
Email: belyaevmma@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9010-4326

student of the Department of Industrial Pharmacy

Russian Federation, Bld. 2-8, Trubetskaya St., Moscow, 119991

Zhanna I. Aladysheva

First Moscow State Medical University named after I.M. Sechenov

Email: zhaladysheva@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2441-3542

Candidate of Sciences (Mediсine), Associate Professor of the Department of Industrial Pharmacy

Russian Federation, Bld. 2-8, Trubetskaya St., Moscow, 119991

Natal’ya V. Pyatigorskaya

First Moscow State Medical University named after I.M. Sechenov

Email: osipova-mma@list.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4901-4625

Doctor of Sciences (Pharmacy), Professor, the Head of the Department of Industrial Pharmacy

Russian Federation, Bld. 2-8, Trubetskaya St., Moscow, 119991

Vasilij V. Belyaev

First Moscow State Medical University named after I.M. Sechenov

Email: belyaev-mma@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3011-9390

Candidate of Sciences (Pharmacy), Associate Professor of Industrial Pharmacy

Russian Federation, Bld. 2-8, Trubetskaya St., Moscow, 119991

Valerij V. Beregovyh

First Moscow State Medical University named after I.M. Sechenov

Email: beregovykh@ramn.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0210-4570

Doctor of Sciences (Engineering), Professor, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Professor of the Department of Industrial Pharmacy

Russian Federation, Bld. 2-8, Trubetskaya St., Moscow, 119991

References

  1. Ivashina MM, Natsypaeva EA, Popova LF. The risk-based approach as the direction of the improvement of the quality management system of industrial enterprises. Economic Journal. 2018;2 (50):28–38. Russian
  2. Chernenkii AV. Application of risk-oriented approach for creation of quality management system. International research journal. 2016;8(50) Part 1: 92–96. Russian.
  3. Claycamp H Gregg. Probability Concepts in Quality Risk Management. PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology January. 012;66(1):78–89.
  4. O’Donnell K, Greene A., Zwitkovits M, Calnan N. Quality Risk Management: Putting GMP Controls First. PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology. 2012;66(3):243–261.
  5. Vega H, Rivera R. Quality Risk Management for Legacy Products in CMOs. Pharmaceutical Engineering. 2016: 84–90.
  6. Assem A. Implementation of Quality Risk Management for Manufacturing of a Non-Sterile Pharmaceutical Product – Case study. Cohesive Journal of Microbiology & Infectious Disease. 2018;1(3).
  7. Powar PV, Shirode DS. Quality by Design: Predefined Objected Quality and Quality Risk Management. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Rev. Res. 2020;65(1):14–26.
  8. Reddy VV, Vishal Gupta N, Raghunandan HV, Nitin Kashyap U. Quality Risk Management in Pharmaceutical Industry: A Review. International Journal of Pharm Tech Research. 2014;6(3):908–914.
  9. Vartak1 RP, Bhagure GR. Quality Risk Management in Pharmaceutical Industry-A Overview. Asian Journal of Chemistry. 2012;24(12):5576–5578.
  10. Vesper J, O’Donnell K. Current Challenges in Implementing Quality Risk Management. Pharmaceutical Engineering. 2016:73–79.
  11. Sattar Khan A, Khan F, Rao N. Quality risk management in pharmaceutical industries. International journal of research in pharmacy and chemistry. – 2020;10(2):215–223.
  12. Mollah H., Baseman H., Long M. Risk Management Applications in Pharmaceutical and Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing. Wiley. 2013: 414.
  13. Alexandrov AV. Vospitanie privychki k upravleniiu riskami dlia kachestva. Pharmaceutical industry. 2015;4(51):112–114. Russian
  14. Alexandrov A.V. Faktor subjektivnosti pri ocenke riska po kachestvuy. Pharmaceutical industry. 2011;5(28):116–119. Russian
  15. Hajimolaali M, Asl AA. Quality Risk Assessment Production of Beta Lactams by FMEA Model and Fuzzy Theory Method. Gen Med (Los Angel). 2016;4(1).
  16. Omar A Ismael, Moyassar I. Ahmed. Using Quality Risk Management in Pharmaceutical Industries: A Case Study. Quality Access to success. 2020;21(178):106–113.
  17. Mandhare TA, Khuspe PR, Nangare PS, Vyavhare RD. Quality Risk Management: A Review. American Journal of PharmTech Research. 2018;8(2):56–86.
  18. Parashar N, Geete A. Step wise approach for the Quality Risk Management (QRM) in pharmaceutical industries. Available from: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/step-wise-approach-quality-risk-management-qrm-neha / (accessed: 19.02.2021).
  19. Mire-Sluis A, Ramnarine E, Siemiatkoski J et al. Practical Applications of Quality Risk Management. BioProcess International. 2010;8(3):20–32.
  20. H. Gregg Claycamp. Perspective on Quality Risk Management of Pharmaceutical Quality. Drug Information Journal. 2007;41:353–367.
  21. Alemayehu D, Alvir J, Levenstein M, Nickerson D. A data-driven approach to quality risk management. Perspectives in Clinical Research. 2013;4(4):221–226.
  22. O’Connor T, Yang X, Tian G, Chatterjee S, Lee S. Quality risk management for pharmaceutical manufacturing: The role of process modeling and simulations. Predictive Modeling of Pharmaceutical Unit Operations. 2017: 15–37.
  23. Das A, Kadwe1 P, Mishra JK, Moorkoth S. Quality Risk Management (QRM) in Pharmaceutical Industry: Tools and Methodology. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance. 2014;5(3):13–21.
  24. Germany Trade & Invest. Industry overview. The Pharmaceutical Industry in Germany. Issue 2017/2018. Available from: https://www.vfa.de/embed/the-pharmaceutical-industry-in-germany.pdf (accessed: 30.09.2020).
  25. The European Expertise Center for Pharmacy Education and Training (EEC-PET). Pharmine project. Country profiles. Available from: https://eec-pet.eu/pharmacy-education/country-profiles/ (accessed: 30.09.2020).
  26. Haddad G., Greene A. Quality Risk Management: A Role-Based Competency Model. PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology. 2020;74(1):58–72.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Figure 1 – Distribution of respondents by the size of their enterprise

Download (47KB)
3. Figure 2 – Distribution of respondents by work experience in the pharmaceutical industry

Download (24KB)
4. Figure 3 – Manufactured dosage forms

Download (75KB)
5. Figure 5 – Areas where quality risk management is most commonly used

Download (150KB)
6. Figure 6 – The most commonly used risk assessment tools and methods

Download (37KB)
7. Figure 7 – The main difficulties faced by enterprises during the implementation of a quality risk management system

Download (107KB)
8. Figure 8 – Sufficiency of the number of employees with the necessary knowledge and experience in risk assessments

Download (36KB)
9. Figure 9 –Criticism of quality risk management system identified during external inspections

Download (68KB)
10. Figure 10 – Positive effects of the quality risk management implementation at the enterprise

Download (129KB)
11. Figure 11 – Available high-level documents regulating the quality risk management system

Download (43KB)
12. Figure 12 – Approaches to formalization of the quality risk management system

Download (209KB)
13. Figure 13 – Actions in relation to the quality risks

Download (150KB)
14. Figure 14 – Contents of the quality risk register

Download (98KB)
15. Figure 15 -Information in the Procedure for assessing effectiveness of risk management system and risk management plans

Download (83KB)
16. Figure 16 – Measures that can help improve the effectiveness of quality risk management in Russian pharmaceutical industry

Download (89KB)

Copyright (c) 2020 Kashirina A.B., Aladysheva Z.I., Pyatigorskaya N.V., Belyaev V.V., Beregovykh V.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
 

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies