Prevention of negative social and environmental consequences of suffosion

详细

Introduction. The subject of the study is suffusion — an exogenous geological process dangerous for construction, capable to cause a catastrophe. The term suffosion is interpreted most widely in comparison with other interpretations: according it suffosion includes leaching, piping, subsurface erosion of soils or rocks, cemented by soluble material. The aim of the study is to analyze the interaction of natural and anthropogenic subsystems in natural-technical systems arising from the economic development of territories favourable for the development of suffosion processes.Materials and methods. Domestic and foreign experience of exploitation of objects of various purposes experiencing negative impact of natural and anthropogenic suffosion processes is analyzed from the position of system approach. Special attention is paid to possible catastrophic consequences of such impacts for buildings and structures. It is noted that, despite the presence of certain positive aspects in the interaction of suffosion with the environment, negative aspects prevail.Results. Neutralization of possible undesirable social and ecological consequences of formation of various kinds of underground and surface suffosion manifestations is achieved by rational choice, clear engineering-geological substantiation and competent implementation of measures that sharply reduce (and sometimes exclude) the possibility of related emergencies. Classification of currently used and quite suitable for application in the future methods of protection of territories, buildings and structures from negative consequences of suffosion development, including those provoked by the protected object itself, is proposed. Different variants of protective measures related to each of the identified types of anti-suffosion measures are mentioned.Conclusions. It is noted that in the presence of existing suffosion occurrences on a particular territory or in case of a scientifically justified assumption regarding the potential possibility of development of suffosion processes, a comprehensive assessment of the natural-technogenic situation and its expected changes is necessary. This should be followed by planning of further actions, either to preserve the landscape elements formed by suffosion or to eliminate any threats from this process as much as possible.

作者简介

V. Khomenko

Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU)

Email: khomenko_geol@mail.ru

参考

  1. Истомина В.С. Фильтрационная устойчивость грунтов. М. : Госстройиздат, 1957. 295 с.
  2. Ломтадзе В.Д. Инженерная геология. Инженерная геодинамика. Л. : Недра, 1977. 479 с.
  3. Хоменко В.П. Закономерности и прогноз суффозионных процессов. М. : ГЕОС, 2003. 216 с.
  4. Павлов А.П. О рельефе равнин и его изменениях под влиянием работы подземных и поверхностных вод // Землеведение. 1898. Т. 5. Кн. 3–4. С. 91–147.
  5. Skempton A.W. Landmarks in early soil mechanics // The measurement, selection, and use of design parameters in geotechnical engineering : Proceedings of 7th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Brighton, UK, September 1979. Vol. 5. London : British Geotechnical Society, 1979. Pр. 1–26.
  6. Engemoen W.O., Redlinger C.G. Internal erosion incidents at Bureau of Reclamation dams // Managing our Water Retention Systems: Proceedings of 29th USSD Annual Meeting and Conference, Nashville, TN, April 20–24, 2009. Denver, CO : U.S. Society on Dams, 2009. Pр. 731–745.
  7. Суздалева А.Л., Слесарев М.Ю., Яковлева И.Ю. Опасные геологические процессы на участках объектов незавершенного строительства // Вестник МГСУ. 2003. Т. 18. Вып. 10. С. 1599–1607. doi: 10.22227/1997-0935.2023.10.1599-1607
  8. Nahlieli A., Svoray T., Argaman E. Piping formation and distribution in the semi-arid Northern Negev environment: A new conceptual model // Catena. 2022. Vol. 213. Article No 106201. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2022.106201
  9. Kariminejad N., Sepehr A., Poesen J., Hassanli A. Combining UAV remote sensing and pedological analyses to better understand soil piping erosion // Geoderma. 2023. Vol. 429. Article No 116267. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.116267
  10. Chibuogwu I.U., Ugwu G.Z. Exploring tunnel erosion susceptibility in Southern Nigeria, using direct current geophysical techniques // African Journal of Environment and Natural Science Research. 2023. Vol. 6. Issue 3. Pр. 67–87. doi: 10.52589/AJENSR-DDBGL2HW
  11. Bernatek-Jakiel A., Nadal-Romero E. Can soil piping impact environment and society? Identifying new research gaps // Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. 2022. Vol. 48. Issue 1. Pр. 72–86. doi: 10.1002/esp.5431
  12. Dastpak P., Sousa R.L., Dias D. Soil erosion due to defective pipes: a hidden hazard beneath our feet // Sustainability. 2023. Vol. 15. Article No. 8931. doi: 10.3390/su15118931
  13. Kurniawan A., Mc. Kenzie J., Putri J.A. Gene-ral dictionary of geology. Yogyakarta : Department of Environmental Geography. Gadjah Mada University, 2009. 60 p.
  14. Encyclopedia of Geomorphology. Vol. 1 and 2. Edited by A.S. Goudie. London : Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2004. 1201 p.
  15. Hutchinson J.N. Damage to slopes produced by seepage erosion in sands // Landslides and mudflows: Reports of Alma Ata International Seminar, October 1981. M. : Centre of International Projects, GKNT, 1982. Pр. 250–265.
  16. Рагозин А.Л. Концепция допустимого риска и строительное освоение территорий развития опасных природных и техноприродных процессов // Проект. 1993. № 5–6. С. 250–253.
  17. Трофимов В.Т., Красилова Н.С. Геодинамические критерии оценки состояния эколого-геологических условий // Геоэкология. Инженерная геология. Гидрогеология. Геокриология. 2000. № 3. С. 257–263.
  18. Хоменко В.П. Противокарстовая и противосуффозионная защита в России: история и современность // Вестник МГСУ. 2018. Т. 13. Вып. 4 (115). С. 231–238.
  19. Кашперюк П.И., Москалев Д.С., Хоменко В.П. Водопонижение как ведущий фактор развития суффозии при строительстве фундаментов глубокого заложения // Геоэкология. Инженерная геология. Гидрогеология. Геокриология. 2023. № 4. С. 18–28. doi: 10.31857/S0869780923030049
##common.cookie##