Modern View of Praxeology as a Political Science

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

In recent years – the years of geopolitical instability – the public expects political scientists to understand the upcoming threats and scientifically based political forecasts. Among the existing methods and approaches of political analysis, praxeology mains the most non-theoretical subject of political science. The historical development of praxeology has shown that today it can be applied to a system of hostile actions that are an integral part of international relations. Using the example of K. Boulding’s threat system, a praxeological approach was applied to the EU’s sanctions policy against Russia. The key factors that increase the likelihood of threats and corresponding responses to them were identified. The results of the contextual study of praxeology have shown the prospect for further theoretical developments in the field of political analysis and the development of praxeology as an actual subdiscipline of political science.

作者简介

Irina Orlova

Institute of Public Administration and Civil Service of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: iv.orlova@igsu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9212-8735
Scopus 作者 ID: 676060

Dr. Sci. (Philos.), Professor, Professor, Department of UNESCO

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

Tatyana Paveleva

Moscow State Technological University “Stankin”

Email: pavelieva@yandex.ru
Scopus 作者 ID: 402541

Dr. Sci. (Philos.), Professor; Head, Department of Philosophy and Social Management

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

Alena Sgibneva

Institute of Public Administration and Civil Service of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

Email: sgibnevalena@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0007-1917-2717

graduate student

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

参考

  1. Aron R. Peace and war: A theory of international relations. V.I. Danilenko (ed.). Moscow: Nota Bene, 2000.
  2. Pavlovich A.A. Praxeology of science and praxeological opportunities. Technologic. 2010. No. 2. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/praksiologiya-nauk-i-ih-prakseologicheskie-vozmozhnosti-1
  3. Boulding K.E. Towards a pure theory of threat systems. The American Economic Review. 1963. Vol. 53. No. 5.
  4. Garfinkel H. Recherches en ethbomethodologie. M. Barthelemy, B. Dupret, J.-M. de Queiroz, L. Quere (trad. France). Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 2007.
  5. Habermas J. Theory and practice. Boston, USA: Beacon Press, 1973.
  6. Luze H. Ethnomethodologie orale et grammaires generatives des moeurs. Paris: Loris Talmart, 1996.
  7. Montbrial de T. Le systeme international: approach et dynamiques. Politique étrangère. HIVER. 2006. Vol. 71. No. 4.
  8. Olgiati F. Carmelo Ottaviano e la prassiologia. Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica: Vita e Pensiero – Pubblicazioni dell’Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore. 1954. Vol. 46. No. 6.
  9. Ostrowski J. Réponse à un appel. In: Mathématiques et sciences humaines. T. 19, 1967.
  10. Parsons T. The action ftame of reference and the general theory of action systems. In: Classic Contribution to Social Psychology. E.P. Hollander, R.G. Hunt (eds.). New York; London; Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1972.

版权所有 © Yur-VAK, 2023

##common.cookie##