Role, Place and Importance of the Discipline “Philosophy” in University Education
- Авторлар: Orekhovskaya N.A.1, Denikina Z.D.1, Denikin A.V.1
-
Мекемелер:
- Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
- Шығарылым: Том 15, № 2 (2025)
- Беттер: 209-214
- Бөлім: Sociology of management
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2223-0092/article/view/296110
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.33693/2223-0092-2025-15-2-209-214
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OUTIVG
- ID: 296110
Дәйексөз келтіру
Аннотация
The status of philosophy as an integral part of the culture of mankind is a sufficient basis for including it in the unspoken list of basic disciplines required to be studied at a university, in order to familiarize students with the basic principles of the universe and classical ideas about the place and role of man in the world. For many centuries, philosophy was considered the foremother of all sciences, therefore, the most common strategy of a university philosophy course is characterized by a bias towards the history of this science, which contributes to the formation of a certain body of knowledge necessary to demonstrate one’s own erudition, but does not have a special impact on the practical activities of the individual. That is why the author of the article considered it necessary to raise the question of changing the view on the place and significance of this discipline in the educational process of a university in conditions when the competency-based approach is proclaimed one of the fundamental ones, and philosophy is the best suited for the formation of critical thinking competencies and skills in analyzing the phenomena of the newest era. The purpose of this article is to identify the problem field associated with the task of philosophy as a science that contributes to the formation of thinking practices necessary for a university graduate to determine a personal attitude to the key issues of our time. The object of study is philosophy as a university discipline. The research methodology is based on general scientific methodological principles. Scientific novelty. Having examined the existing strategies for teaching philosophy at the university, the author argues for the legitimacy of maintaining the discipline in the university curriculum, subject to improving the methodology of its teaching, taking into account modern realities and updating the content of public demand.
Толық мәтін
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##Авторлар туралы
Natalia Orekhovskaya
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: naorehovskaya@fa.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8390-5275
SPIN-код: 2650-7619
Dr. Sci. (Philos.), Professor, Professor, Department of Humanities Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Ресей, MoscowZoya Denikina
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Email: zooden@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3119-1546
SPIN-код: 6574-8015
Dr. Sci. (Philos.), Professor, Professor, Department of Sociology
Ресей, MoscowAnatoly Denikin
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Email: andenikin@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2466-0703
SPIN-код: 4127-7164
Dr. Sci. (Philos.), Professor, Professor Department of Sociology
Ресей, MoscowӘдебиет тізімі
- Adorno T.V. What else is philosophy for. Topos. Philosophical and Cultural Journal. 2012. No. 1. Pp. 14–26. (In Rus.)
- Babkin V.F., Perevozchikova L.S. Humanism as the value basis of modern higher technical education. Textbook for universities. Voronezh: Publishing House of the State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering. 2001. 219 p.
- Hegel G. On teaching philosophy at universities. Works of different years. In 2 vols. Moscow: Thought. 1970. Vol. 1. Pp. 417–427.
- Glios G.N. Philosophy of education as a conceptual basis of modern Russian education. Philosophical, Sociological, Psychological and Pedagogical Problems of Modern Education. 2022. No. 4. Pp. 14–16. (In Rus.)
- Huseynov A.A. Philosophy and higher education (some reflections on the domestic experience). Semestrial Papers of Applied Ethics. 2024. No. 1 (63). Pp. 94–103. (In Rus.)
- Ivanova A.R., Godina P.V. On the question of the role of philosophy in the system of modern higher education. Trends in the Development of Science and Education. 2023. No. 93-6. Pp. 89–93. (In Rus.)
- Kant I. Dispute of faculties. Works in six volumes. Moscow: Thought. 1966. Vol. 6. Pp. 257–347.
- Nepomnyashchy A.V., Neschchadim I.O. Philosophy of modern education: from separatism to integration. The World of University Science: Culture, Education. 2023. No. 2. Pp. 17–25. (In Rus.)
- Nikolaeva N.V. The specifics of teaching philosophy in modern higher education. Socio-humanitarian Review. 2022. No. 2. Pp. 45–48. (In Rus.)
- Udinkan O.V. The projective role of philosophy in the formation of the value orientation of youth in the higher education system. Problems of Education in Conditions of Innovative Development. 2020. No. 1. Pp. 144–149. (In Rus.)
- Khalin S.M. Philosophy and traditional formal logic as specially professional disciplines for all areas of higher education. Bulletin of the Russian Philosophical Society. 2020. No. 1-2 (91-92). Pp. 245–247. (In Rus.)
- Benner D. Wilhelm von Humboldts Bildungstheorie. Eine Problemgeschichtliche Studie zum Begründungszusammenhang neuzeitlicher Bildungsreform. Weinheim; München: Juventa Verlag, 1990. 232 p.
- Dummett M. The place of philosophy in European culture. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy. 2012. Vol. 8. No. 1. Pp. 14–23.
- Schleiermacher F. Gelegentliche Gedanken über Universitäten in deutschen Sinne. In: Schleiermachers Werke. Neuedrück der 2. Auflage. Leipzig: Scientia Verlag. 1967. Pp. 533–643.
Қосымша файлдар
