Email this article Post-Soviet space multilateral interactions dynamics promoted by the intraregional and extra-regional actors: internal and external implications
- Authors: Izotov A.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- St. Petersburg State University (SPbSU)
- Issue: Vol 14, No 4 (2024)
- Pages: 118-123
- Section: Political identity of Russia in the modern world
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2223-0092/article/view/279811
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.33693/2223-0092-2024-14-4-118-123
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OYSLGH
- ID: 279811
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Subscription Access
Abstract
The article examines the key aspects of multilateral economic cooperation between the countries of the post-Soviet space. In addition to Eurasian economic integration within the framework of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), there are other forms of multilateral economic cooperation in the post-Soviet space, mainly, initiated and promoted by the European Union, China and Turkey. On the other hand, the EAEU also seeks to build foreign economic relations with third countries located outside the pro-Soviet space, for example, by creating free trade areas with them. The article analyzes the main characteristics, prospects, limitations and problems of these types of multilateral economic cooperation, and the main aspects of their interaction.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Alexander V. Izotov
St. Petersburg State University (SPbSU)
Author for correspondence.
Email: a.v.izotov@spbu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1290-5264
SPIN-code: 1302-1701
Scopus Author ID: 55523018000
ResearcherId: H-3971-2013
Cand. Sci. (Polit.), Associate Professor; associate professor, Department of European Studies
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgReferences
- Abramova O.D. Cooperation between Russia and China in the implementation of the “Economic zone of Silk Road” project. Eurasian Union: Issues of International Relations. 2017. No. 3 (21). Pp. 5–11. (In Rus.)
- Butorina O.V. The specifics of the Eurasian model of economic integration. Contemporary Europe. 2016. No. 2. Pp. 28–32. (In Rus.)
- Butorina O.V., Zakharov A.V. Scientific basis of the Eurasian Economic Union. Eurasian Economic Integration. 2015. No. 2. Pp. 52–68. (In Rus.)
- Izotov A.V. Analysis of the determining factors of the EU-Russia relations. Azimuth of Scientific Research: Economics and Administration. 2015. No. 4 (13). Pp. 83–86. (In Rus.)
- Kaveshnikov N.Yu. Ukraine’s membership application as a trigger to reform the EU enlargement policy. Contemporary Europe. 2022. No. 6 (113). Pp. 18–34. (In Rus.)
- Korolev A.S. Proactive vs reactive: Interim results of the EAEU’s foreign economic policy: Working paper No. 83. E.O. Karpinskaya, Yu.Yu. Melnikova, L.V. Nechaeva, G.V. Gryzlova, S.M. Gavrilova (eds.). Moscow: NP RIAC, 2023. 40 p.
- Ostrovsky A. Prospects for connecting projects of the economic belt of the Silk Road and the Eurasian Economic Union. Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2017. No. 11 (87). Pp. 974–985. (In Rus.)
- Fedorov N.V. Specifics of interaction between Russia and Singapore in new geopolitical reality. In: Russia and the East. To the 300th anniversary of St. Petersburg State University. Materials of the XXXIII International Congress on Source Studies and Historiography of Asian and African Countries. N.N. Dyakov, A.O. Pobedonostseva, P.I. Rysakova (eds.). St. Petersburg, 2023. Pp. 714–716.
- Shishelina L.N. Ten years of the Eastern Partnership. Scientific-analytical Bulletin of the Institute of Europe RAS. 2018. No. 6. Pp. 26–35. (In Rus.)
- Shlapeko E., Stepanova S. Great Silk Road and Eurasian integration. World Economy and International Relations. 2018. No. 1 (62). Pp. 43–52. (In Rus.)
- Kaczmarski M. Non-Western visions of regionalism: China’s New Silk Road and Russia’s Eurasian Economic Union. International Affaires. 2017. No. 93 (6). Pp. 1357–1376. doi: 10.1093/ia/iix182.
Supplementary files
