The structure and characteristics of investment decision-making in a hedge fund

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The article structured the elements of the process of making investment decisions in a hedge fund for the purposes of formalizing a decision support system (DSS). In particular, the authors systematized risk control methods when making investment decisions within a hedge fund, taking into account portfolio optimization, tasks and conditions for achieving optimality. The authors raise the issue of strategies' mutual correlation, which leads to a potential threat of a decrease in resource provision (in the informational aspect) of a decision maker when working with DSS with a focus on the proposed target value to resolve a problematic situation. To solve this problem, it is proposed to carry out constant monitoring and updating of the accumulated knowledge base by the subject of management (manager) about the management object (investment strategy).It is also necessary to control the flows in the management object on the basis of matching needs and opportunities through logical and linguistic modeling (frames) in order to maintain the system's homeokinetic equilibrium.

About the authors

Natalya Stepanovna Voronova

St Petersburg State University

Email: n.voronova@spbu.ru
Проф., д.э.н., проф.

Elena Anatolevna Yakovleva

Saint Petersburg State University of Economics

Email: helen7199@gmail.com
Проф., д.э.н., доцент

Ermin Emirovich Sharich

St Petersburg State University

Email: st062696@student.spbu.ru
студент

Darya Dmitrievna Yakovleva

St Petersburg State University

Email: st062671@student.spbu.ru
студент

References

  1. Sharpe W.F. The Sharpe ratio // The Journal of Portfolio Management. – 1994. – № 21(1). – p. 49–58.
  2. Fama E. F., French K. R. International tests of a five-factor asset pricing model // Journal of financial Economics. – 2017. – № 123(3). – p. 441-463.
  3. Amel-Zadeh Amir, George Serafeim Why and How Investors Use ESG Information: Evidence from a Global Survey. / Working Paper. - Harvard Business School, 2017. – 87–103 p.
  4. Volkova V.N., Vasiliev A.Y., Efremov A.A., Loginova A.V. Information technologies to support decision-making in the engineering and control // Proceedings of 2017 20th IEEE International Conference on Soft Computing and Measurements: SCM 2017; St. Petersburg; Russian Federation; 24-26 May 2017. 2017. – p. 727-730.
  5. Кукор Б.Л. Адаптивное управление промышленным комплексом региона: теория, методология, практика. / Б.Л. Кукор, Г.А. Клименков; под общ. ред. Б.Л. Кукора. - Екатеринбург; Санкт-Петербург: ФГБУН Институт экономики Уральского отделения РАН, 2017. – 306 c.
  6. Поспелов Д.А. Десять «горячих точек» в исследованиях по искусственному интеллекту // Интеллектуальные системы. – 1996. – № 1-4. – c. 47—56.
  7. Hull J.C. Risk management and financial institutions. - New York: Pearson Education International, 2007. – 576 p.
  8. Jorion P. Value at risk: The new benchmark for managing financial risk. - New York: McGraw-Hill Education, 2007. – 624 p.
  9. Jalota Hemant, Thakur Manoj, Mittal Garima Modelling and constructing membership function for uncertain portfolio parameters: A credibilistic framework // Expert Systems with Applications. – 2016. – № 71(2). – p. 40-56. – doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2016.11.014.
  10. Fama E.F., French K.R. The cross-section of expected stock returns // Journal of Financial Economics. – 1992. – № 2. – p. 427-465.
  11. Lochof R. Hedge Funds and Hope // The Journal of Portfolio Management. – 2002. – № 28. – p. 92-99.
  12. Bansal Ravi, Kiku Dana, Shaliastovich Ivan, Yaron Amir Volatility, the Macroeconomy and Asset Prices // The Journal of Finance. – 2012. – № 69(6). – doi: 10.1111/jofi.12110.
  13. Yin C., Zhu D. New class of distortion risk measures and their tail asymptotics with emphasis on Va R // Journal of Financial Risk Management. – 2018. – № 07(01). – p. 12–38. – doi: 10.4236/jfrm.2018.71002.
  14. Levy H., Markowitz H.M. Approximating Expected Utility by a Function of Mean and Variance // American Economic Review. – 1979. – № 69(3). – p. 308-317.
  15. Black F., Litterman R. Global Asset Allocation with Equities, Bonds, and Currencies. - Fixed Income Research, Goldman, Sachs Company, 1991. – 40 p.
  16. Яковлева Е.А., Гаджиев М.М., Шарич Э.Э., Яковлева Д.Д. Принятие инвестиционных решений хедж-фондом на основе динамического риск-контроля // Экономика, предпринимательство и право. – 2022. – № 1. – c. 223-238. – doi: 10.18334/epp.12.1.114226.
  17. Воронова Н.С., Шарич Э.Э., Яковлева Д.Д. Архитектура системы поддержки принятия инвестиционных решений в финансовой экономике на основе мониторинга рыночной конъюнктуры // Экономика, предпринимательство и право. – 2020. – № 12. – c. 2933-2946.
  18. Markowitz H.M. Portfolio selection // J. Finance. – 1952. – № 7. – p. 77–91.
  19. Кукор Б.Л., Куршев Е.П., Виноградов А.Н. Разработка динамического когнитивного сценария функционирования предприятия и производственных комплексов в процессе управления экономикой // Теоретические проблемы стратегического планирования на микроэкономическом уровне: Сборник докладов участников секционных заседаний XXI Всероссийского симпозиума. Москва, 2020. – c. 98-101.

Copyright (c) 2023 Voronova N.S., Yakovleva E.A., Sharich E.E., Yakovleva D.D.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies