Progression of atherosclerosis as the cause of recurrence of angina in a patient with ischemic heart disease in the first year after angioplasty and stenting of the coronary arteries


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Estimation of the proportion of iatrogenic intima lesion of the coronary artery in the structure of recurrence of coronary syndrome after angioplasty and stenting is an insufficiently studied issue. Considering the continuously increasing number of PCI procedures, an increase in the degree of technical complexity (especially in multivessel coronary artery disease involving proximal segments in the atherosclerotic process), the study of this topic seems topical and practically meaningful. In clinical practice, aggressive methods of carrying out the endovascular procedure (deep intubation of the conductor catheter, the use of an extension of the conductor catheter, etc.) increasingly lead to the progression of atherosclerosis in the proximal segments of the coronary arteries, especially in the presence of their initial lesion.

About the authors

E. B Molokhoev

National Medical Research Center for Preventive Medicine of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Email: dr.molokhoev@mail.ru
аспирант, отд-ние рентгенэндоваскулярных методов диагностики и лечения 101990, Russian Federation, Moscow, Petroverigskii per., d. 10, str. 3

B. A Rudenko

National Medical Research Center for Preventive Medicine of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

д-р мед. наук, вед. науч. сотр., лаб. рентгенэндоваскулярных методов диагностики и лечения 101990, Russian Federation, Moscow, Petroverigskii per., d. 10, str. 3

A. S Shanoyan

National Medical Research Center for Preventive Medicine of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

канд. мед. наук, зав. отд-нием рентгенхирургических методов диагностики и лечения 101990, Russian Federation, Moscow, Petroverigskii per., d. 10, str. 3

O. M Drapkina

National Medical Research Center for Preventive Medicine of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

чл.-кор. РАН, д-р мед. наук, проф., дир. 101990, Russian Federation, Moscow, Petroverigskii per., d. 10, str. 3

References

  1. Kaehler J, Koester R, Billmann W. 13-year follow-up of the German angioplasty bypass surgery investigation. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 2148-53. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi385
  2. Chakravarty T, Buch M.H, Naik H et al. Predictive accuracy of SYNTAX score for predicting long-term outcomes of unprotected left main coronary artery revascularization. Am J Cardiol 2011; 107: 360-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.09.029
  3. Акчурин Р.С., Ширяев А.А., Руденко Б.А. и др. Коронарное шунтирование при рецидиве стенокардии после ангиопластики со стентированием коронарных артерий. Кардиологический вестн. 2013; 8, 2 (20): 12-7.
  4. And G, Frigione P.P, Saporito F. Iatrogenic coronary artery stenosis: A multiform disease. Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Italy article info Article history, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.314
  5. Faggian G, Rigatelli G, Santini F et al. Clinical Research Left main coronary stenosis as a late complication of percutaneous angioplasty:an old problem, but still a problem. J Geriat Cardiol 2009; 6 (1).
  6. Clowes A.W, Reidy M.A, Clowes M.M. Mechanisms of stenosis after arterial injury. Lab Invest 1983; 49: 208-15.
  7. Manderson J.A, Mosse P.R, Safatrom J.A, Young S.B et al. Balloon catheter injury to rabbit carotid artery. Changes in smooth muscle phenotype. Arteriosclerosis 1989; 9: 289-98. DOI: 10.1161/ 01.ATV.9.3.289
  8. Clowes A.W, Schwartz S.M. Significance of quiescent smooth muscle migration in the injured rat carotid artery. Circ Res 1985; 56: 139-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.56.1.139
  9. Wilson V.E, Bates E.R. Subacute bilateral coronary ostial stenosis following cardiac catheterization and PTCA. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1991; 23: 114-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ ccd.1810230210
  10. Waller B, Pinkerton C, Foster L. Morphologic evidence of accelerated left main coronary artery stenosis: A late complication of percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987; 9: 1019-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(87) 80302-9
  11. Lai H, Lee W, Wang K et al. Late proximal coronary artery stenosis complicating percutaneous endovascular catheterization procedures. Neth Heart J 2011; 19: 379-85. doi: 10.1007/s12471-011-0140-2
  12. Ip J.H, Fuster V, Badimon L et al. Syndromes of accelerated atherosclerosis: role of vascular injury and smoothmuscle cell proliferation. J Am College Cardiol 1990; 15 (7): 1667-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(90)92845-S
  13. Willerson J.T, Yao S.K, McNatt J et al. Frequency and severity of cyclic flow alternations and platelet aggregation predict the severity of neointimal proliferation following experimental coronary stenosis and endothelial injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991; 88 (23): 10624-8.
  14. Wayne V.S, Harper R.W, Pitt A. Left main coronary artery stenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1988; 61: 459-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0002-9149(88)90305-0
  15. Alsaddah J, Alkandari S, Younan H. Iatrogenic left main coronary artery stenosis following aortic and mitral valve replacement. Heart Views 2015; 16 (1): 37-39. doi: 10.4103/1995-705X.153001
  16. Harjula A, Mattila S, Mattila I et al. Coronary endothelial damage after crystalloid cardioplegia. J Cardiovasc Surg 1984; 147-52.

Copyright (c) 2018 Eco-Vector

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies