Long-term consequences and secondary prevention in patients who suffered acute coronary syndrome in real clinical practice based on the results of a 12-year follow-up

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The analysis of the long-term consequences of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) revealed a high incidence of complications and their probable relationship with defects in secondary prevention, which allows us to determine the direction of elimination of such defects.

AIM: To assess the long-term consequences of ACS and the effectiveness of secondary prevention.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 255 patients who were sequentially hospitalized in the Regional Vascular Center of Petrozavodsk for ACS in 2009–2010. In the period from October 2021 to February 2022, electronic medical record data were retrospectively analyzed to assess the effects of ACS and the effectiveness of secondary prevention.

RESULTS: Data from 155 patients were analyzed, among whom men predominated (n=113, 72.9%). The mortality rate was high, with a significant prevalence of adverse effects of ACS. The 12-year mortality was 42.6% (66 people), and the average age of the deceased was 62.1±6.8 years. Chronic heart failure was diagnosed in 50 (32.3%) patients. Thirty-five of them had stage IIa (72.9% among 48 patients with a known stage), and 26 had functional class II (FC; 68.4% among 38 patients with a known FC). Stable angina pectoris was diagnosed in 41 patients (26.5%), 26 (66.7% among 39 patients with known FC) had symptoms of FC II, and 31 (20%) had recurrent ACS. Percutaneous intervention was performed in 65% of cases (n=20). Cardiac arrhythmias and conduction disorders were recorded in 41 (26.5%) patients: 15 of them (36.6%) were diagnosed with ventricular extrasystole of high grade (grade IV according to Ryan), and atrial fibrillation/flutter developed in 22 (14.2% of all observed) patients. Data indicate a lack of commitment to the principles of secondary prevention for both patients and doctors, except for quitting smoking. Six patients (3.9%) continued to smoke. Moreover, increased body weight persisted in 33 patients (21.3%). The prescription rate for necessary medications was low; acetylsalicylic acid was prescribed to 61 (39.4%) patients, blockers of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system to 74 (47.7%), beta-blockers to 74 (47.7%), and statins to 69 (44.5%), which does not allow achieving the target levels of therapy. The target blood pressure was achieved only in 68 patients (43.9%), heart rate in 23 (14.8%), and lipid spectrum in 2 (1.3%).

CONCLUSION: This study revealed the high incidence of adverse effects of ACS in the long-term period, which, apparently, is a consequence of low adherence to lifestyle modifications and drug correction of risk factors.

About the authors

Aglaya O. Nikitina

Petrozavodsk State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: aglaia-nik@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-2767-4915
SPIN-code: 4035-8060

clinical resident

Russian Federation, Petrozavodsk

Inga S. Egorova

Petrozavodsk State University

Email: inga.skopets@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5157-5547
SPIN-code: 4981-2363

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), associate professor

Russian Federation, Petrozavodsk

Natalia N. Vezikova

Petrozavodsk State University

Email: vezikov23@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8901-3363
SPIN-code: 3910-7360

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), professor, department head

Russian Federation, Petrozavodsk

References

  1. Federal State Statistics Service [Internet]. [cited 2023 Dec 28]. Available from: https://rosstat.gov.ru/ (In Russ).
  2. Regional program «Fight against cardiovascular diseases in the Republic of Karelia for 2019-2024» [cited 2023 Dec 28]. Available from: https://gov.karelia.ru/upload/iblock/cc1/402r_P.pdf (In Russ).
  3. Lipid metabolism disorders [Internet]. Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation [cited 2023 Dec 28]. Available from: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/schema/752_1 (In Russ).
  4. Acute coronary syndrome without ST segment elevation electrocardiogram [Internet]. Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation [cited 2023 Dec 28]. Available from: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/recomend/154. (In Russ).
  5. Arterial hypertension in adults [Internet]. Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation [cited 2023 Dec 28]. Available from: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/schema/62_2 (In Russ).
  6. Acute myocardial infarction with elevation of the ST segment of the electrocardiogram [Internet]. Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation [cited 2023 Dec 28]. Available from https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/schema/157_4 (In Russ).
  7. Boytsov SA, Alekyan BG, Shakhnovich RM, et al. What is changing in the treatment of acute coronary syndrome in the Russian Federation? Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology. 2022;18(6):703–709. doi: 10.20996/1819-6446-2022-12-14
  8. Pereverzeva KG, Lukyanov MM, Andreenko EYu, et al. Outpatient register of patients who have suffered a myocardial infarction (REGATA): prospective follow-up data and outcomes. Kardiologiia. 2022;62(2):12–19. doi: 10.18087/cardio.2022.2.n1712
  9. Erdem G, Bakhai A, Taneja AK, et al. Rates and causes of death from non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: ten year follow-up of the PRAIS-UK registry. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168(1):490–494. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.09.160
  10. Barbarash OL, Sedykh DYu, Gorbunova EV. Key factors determining the risk of recurrent myocardial infarction. Russian Heart Journal. 2017;16(1):26–31. doi: 10.18087/rhj.2017.1.2280
  11. Sodnomova LB, Zandanov AO, Shpak IA, et al. Gospital'nye i otdalennye iskhody u patsientov s ostrym koronarnym sindromom bez pod"ema segmenta ST. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2019:(6). Available from: https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=29370 (In Russ).
  12. Bessonov IS, Kuznetsov VA, Dyakova AO, et al. Percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: 10-years follow-up. Kardiologiia. 2020;60(6):69–75. doi: 10.18087/cardio.2020.6.n982
  13. Shulman VA, Shesternya PA, Golovenkin SE, et al. Prognostic value of atrial fibrillation with regard to early and late outcomes of myocardial infarction. Vestnik aritmologii. 2005;(39):5–9. Available from: http://www.vestar.ru/article.jsp?id=10347 (In Russ).
  14. Wu AD, Lindson N, Hartmann-Boyce J, et al. Smoking cessation for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2022, Issue 8 [cited 2023 Dec 28]. Available from: https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD014936.pub2/full
  15. Yudi MB, Farouque O, Andrianopoulos N, et al. The prognostic significance of smoking cessation after acute coronary syndromes: an observational, multicentre study from the Melbourne interventional group registry. BMJ Open. 2017;7(10):e016874. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016874
  16. Kontsevaya AV, Veretennikova AV, Rozanov VB, et al. Change in patients’ smoking behavior after a myocardial infarction according to a multicenter study. Profilakticheskaya meditsina. 2023;26(6):100–107. doi: 10.17116/profmed202326061100
  17. Pack QR, Rodriguez-Escudero JP, Thomas RJ, et al. The prognostic importance of weight loss in coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014;89(10):1368–1377. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.04.033
  18. Williams MJA, Lee M, Alfadhel M, et al. Obesity and All Cause Mortality Following Acute Coronary Syndrome (ANZACS-QI 53). Heart Lung Circ. 2021;30(12):1854–1862. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2021.04.014
  19. Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C. Effect of combinations of drugs on all cause mortality in patients with ischaemic heart disease: nested case-control analysis. BMJ. 2005;330(7499):1059–1063. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7499.1059
  20. Everly MJ, Heaton PC, Cluxton RJ. Beta-blocker underuse in secondary prevention of myocardial infarction. Ann Pharmacother. 2004;38(2):286–293. doi: 10.1345/aph.1C472
  21. Kirichenko AA. Secondary prevention in stable angina. Consilium Medicum. 2019;21(10):27–33. doi: 10.26442/20751753.2019.10.190515
  22. Baigent C, Sudlow C, et al.; Antithromboci Trialists Collaborat. Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients. BMJ. 2002;324(7329):71–86. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7329.71
  23. Alekseeva IA, Sergienko IV. Atorvastatin in secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in the light of modern recommendations. Ateroskleroz i dislipidemii. 2017;(3):23–32. Available from: https://jad.noatero.ru/index.php/jad/article/download/209/207/208
  24. Athyros VG, Mikhailidis DP, et al.; GREACE Collaborative Group. Effect of atorvastatin on high density lipoprotein cholesterol and its relationship with coronary events: a subgroup analysis of the GREek Atorvastatin and Coronary-heart-disease Evaluation (GREACE) Study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2004:20(5):627–637. doi: 10.1185/030079904125003421
  25. Boytsov SA, Piradov MA, Tanashyan MM, et al. Topical issues of adequate control of dyslipidemia in the prevention of acute and recurrent cerebral circulatory disorders of ischemic type. Zhurnal Nevrologii i Psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova. 2022;122(5):7–10. Available from: https://www.mediasphera.ru/issues/zhurnal-nevrologii-i-psikhiatrii-im-s-s-korsakova/2022/5/1199772982022051007
  26. Davidovich IM, Malay LN, Kutishenko NP. The analysis of long-term outcomes and adherent to treatment in patients after myocardial infarction: Khabarovsk register data. The Clinician. 2016–2017;(4–1):36–44. doi: 10.17650/1818-8338-2016-10-4-36-44
  27. Pogosova NV, Oganov RG, Boytsov SA, et al. Secondary prevention in patients with coronary artery disease in Russia and Europe: results from the Russian part of the EUROASPIRE V survey. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2020;19(6):67–78. doi: 10.15829/1728-8800-2020-2739
  28. Ezhov MV, Sergienko IV, Ahmedzanov NM, et al. Dyslipidemia 2022 — how to reduce the risk and achieve the goal? Ateroskleroz i dislipidemii. 2022;3(48):59–68. doi: 10.34687/2219-8202.JAD.2022.03.0007
  29. Fomin IV, Polyakov DS, Badin YuV. EPOCH: arterial hypertension and coronary heart disease as the main causes of CHF. Effektivnaya farmakoterapiya: kardiologiya i angiologiya. 2011;(1):16–21. Available from: https://umedp.ru/articles/epokha_arterialnaya_gipertoniya_i_ishemicheskaya_bolezn_serdtsa_kak_osnovnye_prichiny_khsn.html?sphrase_id=124741 (In Russ).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Distribution by forms of acute coronary syndrome.

Download (66KB)
3. Fig. 2. The frequency of rhythm disturbances in patients who have undergone acute coronary syndrome (٪ of all patients with rhythm disturbances). Note. ЖЭС — ventricular extrasystole, НЖТ — supraventricular tachycardia, АВ — atrioventricular, СА — sinoatrial.

Download (65KB)

Copyright (c) 2024 Eco-Vector

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies