Factors determining the readiness of a patient with coronary artery disease to use telemedicine technologies for rehabilitation: prospective cohort study

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite its relevance and established efficiency, the third stage of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) lacks a universal solution. The longest rehabilitation period requires many resources and effort on the part of the healthcare system. Digital technologies rapidly developing and being introduced into medicine can significantly assist in organizing the CR process. The healthcare system is already mastered and actively adopting telemedicine technologies into daily practice.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the patients’ preparedness for the upcoming surgical treatment of the chronic types of coronary artery disease to engage in remote cardiac rehabilitation programs using telemedicine technologies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A study of 213 patients treated for artery disease and preparing for planned coronary bypass surgery was conducted. Gender, age, socioeconomic factors, and digital literacy were analyzed. The patients were offered one of two options for completing the third stage of CR: a standard option in which CR is performed under the supervision of a medical worker in a medical organization at the place of residence according to the recommendations received upon hospital discharge or an alternative in which CR is performed at home using remote monitoring under the supervision of specialists from the CR laboratory of the Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases. Patients were divided into two groups based on their choice: those who agreed to participate in the outpatient stage of CR using telemedicine technologies (loyal patients) and those who refused to use telemedicine technologies (nonloyal patients). The factors indicating more loyalty were identified using survey data and correlation analysis, and a portrait of a patient eager to use remote rehabilitation programs was formed.

RESULTS: Social factors, such as living in big cities (p <0.001) and having a spouse (p=0,030), were associated with increased loyalty to participating in CR via telemedicine technologies. Male gender (p <0.001), obesity (p <0.001), and smoking (p <0.001) were associated with the reluctance to participate in the alternative CR program. The education level (p=0.060) did not show a significant impact on the loyalty to use telemedicine technologies.

CONCLUSION: 46% of patients were interested in using remotely controlled CR programs. The social factors determine the loyalty to telemedicine technologies in patients.

About the authors

Tatiana N. Zvereva

Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases; Kemerovo State Medical University

Email: zverevat25@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2233-2095
SPIN-code: 7843-5878

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), associate professor

Russian Federation, Kemerovo; Kemerovo

Anastasia A. Pronina

Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases

Author for correspondence.
Email: nasta60893@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1135-7673
SPIN-code: 2177-1331

graduate student

Russian Federation, Kemerovo

Anastasia V. Babichuk

Kemerovo State Medical University

Email: nbabichuk@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5695-4901
SPIN-code: 2878-1195

graduate student

Russian Federation, Kemerovo

Svetlana A. Pomeshkina

Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases

Email: swetlana.sap2@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3333-216X
SPIN-code: 2018-0860

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, Kemerovo

Olga L. Barbarash

Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases; Kemerovo State Medical University

Email: olb61@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4642-3610
SPIN-code: 5373-7620

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Academician of RAS

Russian Federation, Kemerovo; Kemerovo

References

  1. Cardiovascular Diseases Factsheet [Internet]. World Health Organization [cited 2023 Sep 27]. Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/cardiovascular-diseases#tab=tab_1
  2. Khan MA, Hashim MJ, Mustafa H, et al. Global Epidemiology of Ischemic Heart Disease: Results from the Global Burden of Disease Study. Cureus. 2020;12(7):e9349. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9349
  3. Briffa TG, Hobbs MS, Tonkin A, et al. Population trends of recurrent coronary heart disease event rates remain high. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011;4(1):107–113. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.110.957944
  4. Redfern J, Gallagher R, O'Neil A, et al. Historical Context of Cardiac Rehabilitation: Learning From the Past to Move to the Future. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:842567. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.842567
  5. Ades PA, Keteyian SJ, Wright JS, et al. Increasing Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation From 20% to 70%: A Road Map From the Million Hearts Cardiac Rehabilitation Collaborative. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017;92(2):234–242. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.10.014
  6. Scherrenberg M, Wilhelm M, Hansen D, et al. The future is now: a call for action for cardiac telerehabilitation in the COVID-19 pandemic from the secondary prevention and rehabilitation section of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2021;28(5):524–540. doi: 10.1177/2047487320939671
  7. Piotrowicz E, Piepoli MF, Jaarsma T, et al. Telerehabilitation in heart failure patients: The evidence and the pitfalls. Int J Cardiol. 2016;220:408–413. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.277
  8. Ramachandran HJ, Jiang Y, Tam WWS, et al. Effectiveness of home-based cardiac telerehabilitation as an alternative to Phase 2 cardiac rehabilitation of coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2022;29(7):1017–1043. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwab106
  9. Lyapina IN, Solodukhin AV, Shaleva VA, et al. Adherence to remote rehabilitation program after on-pump cardiac surgey in pandemic period. Kardiologiya I Serdechno-Sosudistaya Khirurgiya. 2023;16(2):183–189. (In Russ). doi: 10.17116/kardio202316021183
  10. Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation N 1705н of 29 December 2012 «O poryadke organizatsii meditsinskoi reabilitatsii». Available from: https://ckbga.ru/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Poryadok-organizacii-med-reabilitacii-N-1705.pdf. Accessed: 27.09.2023. (In Russ).
  11. Argunova YuA, Zvereva TN, Pomeshkin AA, et al. Optimization of a comprehensive prehabilitation program for patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting. Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology. 2020;16(4):508–515. (In Russ). doi: 10.20996/1819-6446-2020-08-06
  12. McMahon SR, Ades PA, Thompson PD. The role of cardiac rehabilitation in patients with heart disease. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2017;27(6):420–425. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2017.02.005
  13. Ögmundsdottir Michelsen H, Sjölin I, Schlyter M, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation after acute myocardial infarction in Sweden — evaluation of programme characteristics and adherence to European guidelines: The Perfect Cardiac Rehabilitation (Perfect-CR) study. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020;27(1):18–27. doi: 10.1177/2047487319865729
  14. Pogosova NV. The Importance of Cardiorehabilitation in the era of modern treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Kardiologiia. 2022;62(4):3–11. (In Russ). doi: 10.18087/cardio.2022.4.n2015
  15. Bjarnason-Wehrens B, McGee H, Zwisler AD, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation in Europe: results from the European Cardiac Rehabilitation Inventory Survey. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010;17(4):410–418. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e328334f42d
  16. Abreu A, Pesah E, Supervia M, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation availability and delivery in Europe: How does it differ by region and compare with other high-income countries? Endorsed by the European Association of Preventive Cardiology. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019;26(11):1131–1146. doi: 10.1177/2047487319827453
  17. Ramachandran HJ, Jiang Y, Teo JYC, et al. Technology Acceptance of Home-Based Cardiac Telerehabilitation Programs in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease: Systematic Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24(1):e34657. doi: 10.2196/34657
  18. Miller JC, Skoll D, Saxon LA. Home Monitoring of Cardiac Devices in the Era of COVID-19. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2020;23(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s11886-020-01431-w
  19. Chong MS, Sit JWH, Karthikesu K, Chair SY. Effectiveness of technology-assisted cardiac rehabilitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021;124:104087. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104087
  20. Bashir Z, Shahab A, Imran H. Comparison of telecardiac rehabilitation with centre-based cardiac rehabilitation and usual care: a protocol for systematic review including a meta-analysis. Open Heart. 2022;9(2):e002018. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2022-002018
  21. Thomas RJ, Beatty AL, Beckie TM, et al. Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Scientific Statement From the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation, the American Heart Association, and the American College of Cardiology. Circulation. 2019;140(1):e69–e89. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000663

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Study design.

Download (164KB)

Copyright (c) 2023 Eco-Vector

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies