在严重合并创伤背景下对一名软组织大面积缺损青少年的手术治疗

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

详细

大面积的创伤后伤口涉及功能活跃区,同时并发化脓坏死过程,无论是在创伤急性期的危急情况下,还是在重建手术治疗阶段,都是一个严重的问题。本临床观察报告涉及一名在渡轮交通事故中受伤的16岁女孩的手术治疗。由于货车的碰撞,女孩被压在容器的金属结构上,遭受了严重的合并创伤。诊断:闭合性颅脑外伤,中度脑挫伤,右侧枕骨线性骨折;胸部闭合性损伤,右侧第9-11肋骨骨折;腹部闭合性损伤;右肾破裂,膀胱损伤,右侧腹膜后血肿;闭合性脊椎创伤,L4-L5椎骨棘突骨折;骨盆开放性骨折,右半部骨盆带和髋关节广泛的创伤后伤口。在2天内初诊住院的医院,进行了开腹手术、右侧粉碎性肾切除术、膀胱缝合术、右侧骶臀股区伤口初诊手术治疗和左侧大腿伤口初诊缝合术、使用外固定杆装置进行盆骨外截骨术。术后早期由于创伤软组织坏死、手术感染(耐多抗生素的微生物菌株)而变得复杂,随后导致伤口缺损面积增大,软组织因化脓融化而损失。复杂的手术治疗旨在消除手术感染,使伤口进入再生阶段,包括反复手术治疗、使用现代敷料和负压疗法。由于外伤和对化脓性并发症的手术治疗,形成了广泛的软组织伤口缺损,位于髋关节功能活跃区和骶骨区,需要在这些区域恢复完整的皮肤。本文介绍了手术置换软组织伤口缺损的策略。使用了非游离 (旋转)供血皮瓣:右侧大腿的基于筋膜张肌的真皮-筋膜-肌肉皮瓣和左侧臀部的臀部真皮-筋膜皮瓣。多阶段手术治疗的结果是,可以替代广泛的软组织伤口缺损,恢复髋关节和骶臀部的完整皮肤。这样就可以避免营养障碍和关节挛缩,并在5年的随访期间取得令人满意的外观和功能效果。

作者简介

Valery A. Mitish

Research Institute of Emergency Pediatric Surgery and Traumatology; P. Lumumba Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia; A.V. Vishnevsky National Medical Research Center of Surgery

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: mitish01@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6411-0709
SPIN 代码: 4529-4044

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Assistant Professor

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow; Moscow; Moscow

Pavel V. Medinskiy

Research Institute of Emergency Pediatric Surgery and Traumatology

Email: pavmedin@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3764-1664
SPIN 代码: 1054-5830
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

Vladimir G. Bagaev

Research Institute of Emergency Pediatric Surgery and Traumatology

Email: bagaev61@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3773-5185
SPIN 代码: 1925-8051

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

Svetlana A. Valiullina

Research Institute of Emergency Pediatric Surgery and Traumatology

Email: vsa64@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1622-0169
SPIN 代码: 6652-2374

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

Maria A. Dvornikova

Research Institute of Emergency Pediatric Surgery and Traumatology

Email: marussiadv@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7397-7416
SPIN 代码: 6235-3671
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

Anastasia A. Gromova

Research Institute of Emergency Pediatric Surgery and Traumatology

Email: gromova.nas@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8628-5710
SPIN 代码: 3115-5413
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

参考

  1. Fisthal EJ. Wound process and results of early surgical treatment of extensive wounds — a perspective on the problem. Bulletin of Emergency and Reconstructive Surgery. 2016;1(2):157–163. (In Russ.) EDN: XICOED
  2. Seliverstov PA, Shapkin YG, Akramov IE. Analysis of the structure of combined and multiple trauma of the musculoskeletal system. Bulletin of medical internet conferences. 2013;3(8):1053. (In Russ.) EDN: RAEOMR
  3. Sridharan SS, You D, Ponich B, et al. Outcomes following pelvic ring fractures in the paediatric population: A systematic review. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020;11(6):963–969. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.10.005
  4. Liu Y, Zhan X, Huang F, et al. The application of lateral-rectus approach on toddlers' unstable pelvic fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-3172-1
  5. Lambrecht D, Van Oost J. bilateral symmetric fracture of the iliac wings: an unusual situation after a car accident. Case Rep Orthop. 2019;2019:7942904. doi: 10.1155/2019/7942904
  6. Kruppa CG, Khoriaty JD, Sietsema DL, et al. Pediatric pelvic ring injuries: How benign are they? Injury. 2016;47(10):2228–2234. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.07.002
  7. Guillaume J-M, Pesenti S, Jouve J-L, Launay F. Pelvic fractures in children (pelvic ring and acetabulum). Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020;106(1S):S125–S133. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.05.017
  8. Dilworth BR, Riehl JT. Open and contaminated pediatric pelvic ring injury case report: Fixation without metal. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;36:167–169. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2017.05.029
  9. Alhammoud A, Moghamis I, Abdelrahman H, et al. Clinical characteristics, injury pattern and management of pediatric pelvic fracture: An observational retrospective study from a level I trauma center. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22(1):626. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04448-6
  10. Zwingmann J, Lefering R, Maier D, et al. Pelvic fractures in severely injured children: results from the TraumaRegister DGU. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(35):e11955. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011955
  11. Gänsslen A, Heidari N, Weinberg AM. Fractures of the pelvis in children: a review of the literature. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2013;23(8):847–861. doi: 10.1007/s00590-012-1102-0
  12. Nguyen ATM, Drynan DP, Holland AJA. Paediatric pelvic fractures — an updated literature review. ANZ J Surg. 2022;92(12):3182–3194. doi: 10.1111/ans.17890
  13. Hermans E, Cornelisse ST, Biert J, et al. Paediatric pelvic fractures: how do they differ from adults? J Child Orthop. 2017;11(1):49–56. doi: 10.1302/1863-2548-11-160138
  14. Baranov AV, Matveev RP, Barachevsky YuE. Pelvic injuries as problem of current traumatism. Human ecology. 2013;(8):58–64. EDN: RAHIZH
  15. Tosounidis TH, Sheikh H, Giannoudis PV. Pelvic fractures in paediatric polytrauma patients: classification, concomitant injuries and early mortality. Open Orthop J. 2015;9(S1:M5):303–312. doi: 10.2174/1874325001509010303
  16. Trofimov EI, Barmin EV, Stepankina ES, Pashintzeva NN. Closure of extensive infected wounds: 15-year experience. Clinical and experimental surgery. Petrovsky journal. 2017;5(4):59–64. EDN: ZXHESH
  17. Baytinger VF, Selayninov KV, Kurochkina OS, et al. Evolution of technologies for closure of vast and deep soft-tissue defects of human body. Issues of reconstructive and plastic surgery. 2018;21(1):5–14. EDN: YUGVNK doi: 10.17223/1814147/64/01
  18. Shibayev EY, Ivanov PA, Nevedrov AV, et al. Tactics of treatment for posttraumatic soft tissue defects of extremities. Russian Sklifosovsky Journal “Emergency Medical Care”. 2018;7(1):37–43. EDN: YWSCGX doi: 10.23934/2223-9022-2018-7-1-37-43

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Local wound treatment stages in a regional hospital: a — wound in the sacrogluteal region on day 24 postinjury; b — wound after repeated surgical debridement; c — wound on day 63 postinjury

下载 (175KB)
3. Fig. 2. Patient’s appearance upon admission to the Research Institute of Emergency Pediatric Surgery and Traumatology (2.5 months postinjury): a — front view; b — rear view; c — right view; d — nature of the discharge from the wound on the bandage; e — left view

下载 (363KB)
4. Fig. 3. Condition of the pelvic bones upon admission to the Research Institute of Emergency Pediatric Surgery and Traumatology and following external fixation device removal (3 months postinjury): a — 3D reconstruction of pelvic CT results upon admission; b — X-ray of the pelvic bones after external fixation device removal; c — reconstruction of pelvic CT results following external fixation device removal

下载 (206KB)
5. Fig. 4. Local wound treatment result 2 months after hospitalization at the institute: а, b — negative pressure wound therapy; c, d — type of wounds after completion of local treatment

下载 (225KB)
6. Fig. 5. Marking (a) and formation of a fasciocutaneous–muscular flap based on the musculus tensor fascia lata (b–d)

下载 (367KB)
7. Fig. 6. The pelvic girdle (a) and right hip (b) after reconstructive surgery

下载 (198KB)
8. Fig. 7. The flap (a, b, c) on day 2 postsurgery

下载 (282KB)
9. Fig. 8. Dynamics of ischemic changes in the flap indicated by the formation of marginal necrosis over 10 cm: а — type of wound on day 15; b — on day 20; с — on day 34; d — on day 54

下载 (256KB)
10. Fig. 9. Stages of wound reconstruction with a rotated gluteal fasciocutaneous flap: a — marking the boundaries of the flap in the left gluteal region; b, c — stages of its formation; d — moving the flap to the wound defect area

下载 (237KB)
11. Fig. 10. Dynamics of wound healing after replacing a wound defect with a gluteal fasciocutaneous flap: а — type of wound on day 5; b — on day 22; с — on day 49

下载 (202KB)
12. Fig. 11. The pelvic girdle (a, b) and right hip (c) after final repair: а — plastic surgery of residual wounds; b — rear view after stitches removed; с — right view after suture removal

下载 (223KB)
13. Fig. 12. X-ray of the pelvic bones before discharge

下载 (98KB)
14. Fig. 13. The patient 5 years after discharge: а — back view; b — right view; c — left view

下载 (167KB)
##common.cookie##