Surgical treatment of a teenager with an extensive wound defect of soft tissues against the background of severe combined injury

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Extensive posttraumatic wounds, affecting functionally active areas and complicated by a purulent–necrotic process, are a serious problem in the acute period of injury due to a critical condition and in reconstructive surgical treatment. This study presents the case of a 16-year-old victim of a transport accident on a ferry who underwent a surgical treatment. Due to a truck collision, the girl was crushed against the metal structure of the ship and received a severe combined injury: closed craniocerebral injury, moderate brain contusion, linear fracture of the occipital bone on the right, closed chest injury, fracture of 9–11 ribs on the right, closed abdominal injury, rupture of the right kidney, damage to the bladder, retroperitoneal hematoma on the right, closed spinal injury, fracture of the spinous processes of the L4–L5 vertebrae, open fractures of the pelvic bones, and extensive posttraumatic wounds of the right half of the pelvic girdle and hip joints. During the initial hospitalization, the following were performed within 2 days: laparotomy, nephrectomy of a crushed kidney on the right, suturing of the bladder, primary surgical treatment of the wound in the sacrogluteofemoral region on the right and the wound of the left thigh with their primary suturing, and external osteosynthesis of the pelvic bones with a rod-based external fixation device. The early postoperative period was complicated by necrosis of injured soft tissues and a new surgical infection (polyantibiotic-resistant strains of microorganisms), which led to an increase in the size of the wound defect and loss of soft tissues due to their purulent melting. Complex surgical treatment aimed at eliminating surgical infection and transferring the wound process to the regeneration phase included repeated surgical treatments and the use of modern dressings and negative pressure therapy. An extensive wound defect of soft tissues caused by and injury or surgical treatment for purulent–necrotic complication was found in the functionally active zone of the hip joint and in the sacral region, which required the restoration of the skin of these areas. A strategy for surgical repair of a soft tissue wound defect is presented. Nonfree (rotated) blood-supply flaps were used: fasciocutaneous muscle flap based on the musculus tensor fascia lata from the right thigh and gluteal fasciocutaneous flap from the left gluteal region. After multistage surgical treatment, it was possible to replace an extensive wound defect of soft tissues and restore full skin in the hip joint and sacrogluteal region, which enabled avoiding trophic disorders and joint contractures and ensured a satisfactory cosmetic and functional result during 5-year followup.

About the authors

Valery A. Mitish

Research Institute of Emergency Pediatric Surgery and Traumatology; P. Lumumba Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia; A.V. Vishnevsky National Medical Research Center of Surgery

Author for correspondence.
Email: mitish01@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6411-0709
SPIN-code: 4529-4044

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Assistant Professor

Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow; Moscow

Pavel V. Medinskiy

Research Institute of Emergency Pediatric Surgery and Traumatology

Email: pavmedin@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3764-1664
SPIN-code: 1054-5830
Russian Federation, Moscow

Vladimir G. Bagaev

Research Institute of Emergency Pediatric Surgery and Traumatology

Email: bagaev61@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3773-5185
SPIN-code: 1925-8051

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Moscow

Svetlana A. Valiullina

Research Institute of Emergency Pediatric Surgery and Traumatology

Email: vsa64@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1622-0169
SPIN-code: 6652-2374

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

Russian Federation, Moscow

Maria A. Dvornikova

Research Institute of Emergency Pediatric Surgery and Traumatology

Email: marussiadv@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7397-7416
SPIN-code: 6235-3671
Russian Federation, Moscow

Anastasia A. Gromova

Research Institute of Emergency Pediatric Surgery and Traumatology

Email: gromova.nas@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8628-5710
SPIN-code: 3115-5413
Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Fisthal EJ. Wound process and results of early surgical treatment of extensive wounds — a perspective on the problem. Bulletin of Emergency and Reconstructive Surgery. 2016;1(2):157–163. (In Russ.) EDN: XICOED
  2. Seliverstov PA, Shapkin YG, Akramov IE. Analysis of the structure of combined and multiple trauma of the musculoskeletal system. Bulletin of medical internet conferences. 2013;3(8):1053. (In Russ.) EDN: RAEOMR
  3. Sridharan SS, You D, Ponich B, et al. Outcomes following pelvic ring fractures in the paediatric population: A systematic review. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020;11(6):963–969. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.10.005
  4. Liu Y, Zhan X, Huang F, et al. The application of lateral-rectus approach on toddlers' unstable pelvic fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-3172-1
  5. Lambrecht D, Van Oost J. bilateral symmetric fracture of the iliac wings: an unusual situation after a car accident. Case Rep Orthop. 2019;2019:7942904. doi: 10.1155/2019/7942904
  6. Kruppa CG, Khoriaty JD, Sietsema DL, et al. Pediatric pelvic ring injuries: How benign are they? Injury. 2016;47(10):2228–2234. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.07.002
  7. Guillaume J-M, Pesenti S, Jouve J-L, Launay F. Pelvic fractures in children (pelvic ring and acetabulum). Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020;106(1S):S125–S133. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.05.017
  8. Dilworth BR, Riehl JT. Open and contaminated pediatric pelvic ring injury case report: Fixation without metal. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;36:167–169. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2017.05.029
  9. Alhammoud A, Moghamis I, Abdelrahman H, et al. Clinical characteristics, injury pattern and management of pediatric pelvic fracture: An observational retrospective study from a level I trauma center. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22(1):626. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04448-6
  10. Zwingmann J, Lefering R, Maier D, et al. Pelvic fractures in severely injured children: results from the TraumaRegister DGU. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(35):e11955. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011955
  11. Gänsslen A, Heidari N, Weinberg AM. Fractures of the pelvis in children: a review of the literature. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2013;23(8):847–861. doi: 10.1007/s00590-012-1102-0
  12. Nguyen ATM, Drynan DP, Holland AJA. Paediatric pelvic fractures — an updated literature review. ANZ J Surg. 2022;92(12):3182–3194. doi: 10.1111/ans.17890
  13. Hermans E, Cornelisse ST, Biert J, et al. Paediatric pelvic fractures: how do they differ from adults? J Child Orthop. 2017;11(1):49–56. doi: 10.1302/1863-2548-11-160138
  14. Baranov AV, Matveev RP, Barachevsky YuE. Pelvic injuries as problem of current traumatism. Human ecology. 2013;(8):58–64. EDN: RAHIZH
  15. Tosounidis TH, Sheikh H, Giannoudis PV. Pelvic fractures in paediatric polytrauma patients: classification, concomitant injuries and early mortality. Open Orthop J. 2015;9(S1:M5):303–312. doi: 10.2174/1874325001509010303
  16. Trofimov EI, Barmin EV, Stepankina ES, Pashintzeva NN. Closure of extensive infected wounds: 15-year experience. Clinical and experimental surgery. Petrovsky journal. 2017;5(4):59–64. EDN: ZXHESH
  17. Baytinger VF, Selayninov KV, Kurochkina OS, et al. Evolution of technologies for closure of vast and deep soft-tissue defects of human body. Issues of reconstructive and plastic surgery. 2018;21(1):5–14. EDN: YUGVNK doi: 10.17223/1814147/64/01
  18. Shibayev EY, Ivanov PA, Nevedrov AV, et al. Tactics of treatment for posttraumatic soft tissue defects of extremities. Russian Sklifosovsky Journal “Emergency Medical Care”. 2018;7(1):37–43. EDN: YWSCGX doi: 10.23934/2223-9022-2018-7-1-37-43

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Local wound treatment stages in a regional hospital: a — wound in the sacrogluteal region on day 24 postinjury; b — wound after repeated surgical debridement; c — wound on day 63 postinjury

Download (175KB)
3. Fig. 2. Patient’s appearance upon admission to the Research Institute of Emergency Pediatric Surgery and Traumatology (2.5 months postinjury): a — front view; b — rear view; c — right view; d — nature of the discharge from the wound on the bandage; e — left view

Download (363KB)
4. Fig. 3. Condition of the pelvic bones upon admission to the Research Institute of Emergency Pediatric Surgery and Traumatology and following external fixation device removal (3 months postinjury): a — 3D reconstruction of pelvic CT results upon admission; b — X-ray of the pelvic bones after external fixation device removal; c — reconstruction of pelvic CT results following external fixation device removal

Download (206KB)
5. Fig. 4. Local wound treatment result 2 months after hospitalization at the institute: а, b — negative pressure wound therapy; c, d — type of wounds after completion of local treatment

Download (225KB)
6. Fig. 5. Marking (a) and formation of a fasciocutaneous–muscular flap based on the musculus tensor fascia lata (b–d)

Download (367KB)
7. Fig. 6. The pelvic girdle (a) and right hip (b) after reconstructive surgery

Download (198KB)
8. Fig. 7. The flap (a, b, c) on day 2 postsurgery

Download (282KB)
9. Fig. 8. Dynamics of ischemic changes in the flap indicated by the formation of marginal necrosis over 10 cm: а — type of wound on day 15; b — on day 20; с — on day 34; d — on day 54

Download (256KB)
10. Fig. 9. Stages of wound reconstruction with a rotated gluteal fasciocutaneous flap: a — marking the boundaries of the flap in the left gluteal region; b, c — stages of its formation; d — moving the flap to the wound defect area

Download (237KB)
11. Fig. 10. Dynamics of wound healing after replacing a wound defect with a gluteal fasciocutaneous flap: а — type of wound on day 5; b — on day 22; с — on day 49

Download (202KB)
12. Fig. 11. The pelvic girdle (a, b) and right hip (c) after final repair: а — plastic surgery of residual wounds; b — rear view after stitches removed; с — right view after suture removal

Download (223KB)
13. Fig. 12. X-ray of the pelvic bones before discharge

Download (98KB)
14. Fig. 13. The patient 5 years after discharge: а — back view; b — right view; c — left view

Download (167KB)

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies