Craniofacial wound from a traumatic pistol injury in a 3-year-old child

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

With the advent of traumatic self-defense weapons among Russian civilians (weapons of limited destruction and nonlethal kinetic weapons), several studies on injuries among the adult population have been published in the medical literature. Skull injuries are the most severe, often fatal, injuries. To date, there are only isolated descriptions of such injuries in children.

Description of the observation. According to the parents, the 3-year-old boy shot himself in the face with an Osa-4 pistol at home. He did not lose consciousness, and the bleeding was light. He was admitted to the central district hospital, from where he was evacuated by an ambulance team to Children’s City Clinical Hospital No. 9 named after. G.N. Speransky, Moscow. Upon admission, the patient was in a serious condition, conscious, and lethargic, reacted negatively to examination, and had 14 points on the Glasgow coma scale, and his hemodynamics was stable. Local status: In the upper part of the dorsum of the nose, a bullet entry hole was observed in the form of a bruised wound of irregular shape, pronounced swelling in the area of the left orbit, and hematoma of the upper eyelid. X-ray images of the skull showed a shadow of a foreign body (bullet) in the projection of the left orbit and ethmoidal labyrinth. The location and extent of damage were clarified by computed tomography. Under endotracheal anesthesia, a supraorbital trans-eyebrow approach on the left with layer-by-layer tissue dissection along the wound canal exposed a part of the bullet, wedged into the medial wall of the orbit and cells of the ethmoid bone. The bullet was removed, and bone fragments and layer-by-layer sutures were removed. Diagnosis: Gunshot causing a blind craniofacial non-penetrating wound in the dorsum of the nose and left orbit, multiple comminuted fractures of the ethmoid bones and superior and medial walls of the left orbit, contusion of the basal parts of the left frontal region of the brain, blunt trauma OS stage 2, local contusion, and retinal hemorrhage The postoperative period passed without complications. The child received a combination of antibacterial and restorative therapy. Vision was preserved, no neurological disorders were detected, and the cosmetic result was good. The patient was discharged in satisfactory condition under the supervision of an ophthalmologist, neurologist, and maxillofacial surgeon. This observation is presented to demonstrate damage to skull structures from traumatic weapons and will aid in further generalization of the treatment results of this type of wound in children. Prevention of injuries in children from traumatic weapons requires extensive educational work among parents who own these weapons.

About the authors

Vladimir I. Petlakh

Veltishchev Research Institute of Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery, Pirogov Russian National Recech Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: vladimirip1@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5403-313X
SPIN-code: 9100-6976

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Moscow

Sergei A. Gorchakov

G.N. Speransky Children’s Hospital No. 9

Email: sagorchakov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0795-6921

Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Moscow

Yulia V. Divilina

G.N. Speransky Children’s Hospital No. 9

Email: divo74@mail.ru
SPIN-code: 8662-2050
Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Abakumov MM, Tsimalaidze LN, Voskresensky OV, Dzhagrayev KR. Medical problems of traumatic gun injuries. Meditsinskaya sestra. 2011;(2):13–17.
  2. Samokhvalov IM, Parfenov VE. Wounds with non-lethal kinetic weapons. Manual for doctors. Saint Petersburg: ELBI-SPb, 2013. 224 p. (In Russ.)
  3. Badalov VI, Zhumanazarov BJ, Ozeretskovsky LB, et al. Features of peaceful time modern gunshot wounds in the big city. Emergency medical care. 2016;17(2):49–56. doi: 10.24884/2072-6716-2016-17-2-49-56
  4. Yasheva SYu, Barachevsky YuE, Huseynov RG. Characterization of injuries from the use of non-lethal kinetic weapons. Military Medicine. 2022;(4):122–124. (In Russ.)
  5. Golovko KP, Maday DYu, Tyurin MV, Tolmachev IA. Features of therapeutic tactics in wounds from non-lethal kinetic weapons of maxillofacial region and brain. Medicо-Biological and Socio-Psychological Problems of Safety in Emergency Situations. 2009;(2):27–31.
  6. Parfenov VE, Samokhvalov IM, Svistov DV, et al. Current views on the treatment of gunshot wounds of the head inflicted by non-lethal kinetic weapons. The Russian Journal of Neurosurgery. 2011;(3):52–59.
  7. Lartizien R, Schouman T, Raux M, et al. Yellow vests protests: facial injuries from rubber bullets. The Lancet. 2019;394(10197):469–470. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31764-7
  8. Leonov SV, Gonikstein YuG. Current state of forensic medical evaluation of weapons of limited destruction. Bulletin of forensic medicine. 2019;8(2):48–54.
  9. Bleshnikov IL, Belykh AN, Boldarian AA, et al. Forensic medicine: national guide. Pigolkin YI, editor. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2018. 76 p. (In Russ.)
  10. Popov VE, Mai RB, Manzhos PI. A penetrating cranio-orbital gunshot wound in a 12-year-old girl. Pediatric Neurosurgery and Neurology. 2018;57(3):53–59.
  11. Kononov RV, Mezentsev AA. Сase of nonperforating nonlethal wound of the head, caused by child’s own hands. Russian Journal of Forensic Medicine. 2015;1(4):27–29. doi: 10.19048/2411-8729-2015-1-4-27-29
  12. Begmanov TA, Nuskabaev BJ, Mukhangaliev NS, et al. A case of gunshot wound of the head with brain detritus damage in a 5-year-old child with a favorable outcome. “Vestnik” of the South-Kazakhstan medical academy. 2011;(3):270–272.
  13. Golub TV, Krivoshapkin AL, Kafanova MJ, Kobozev BB. An interesting clinical case of ultrasound diagnostics application in urgent neurotrauma of pediatric age. Proceeding of the abstracts of the VI Congress of specialists of ultrasound diagnostics of Siberia: “Ultrasound and functional diagnostics”. No. 4; 2012 Oct 17–16; Novosibirsk. Novosibirsk, 2012. P. 107–128. (In Russ.)
  14. pewresearch.org [Internet]. Gramlich J. Gun deaths among U.S. children and teens rose 50% in two years. Per Research Center [cited: 2023 Oct 11]. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/04/06/gun-deaths-among-us-kids-rose-50-percent-in-two-years/
  15. Deng H, Yue JK, Winkler EA, et al. Pediatric firearm-related traumatic brain injury in United States trauma centers. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2019;24(5):498–508. doi: 10.3171/2019.5.PEDS19119
  16. Liker M, Lvi M, Zelman W, et al. Gunshot craniocerebral injuries in children. Craniocerebral trauma. A clinical guide. Vol. 2. Konovalov AN, Likhterman LB, Potapov AA, editors. Moscow, 2001. P. 499–512.
  17. Association of Neurosurgeons of Russia. Craniocerebral trauma in children. Clinical recommendations. Moscow: Ministerstvo Zdravookhraneniya RF, 2022. (In Russ.)
  18. Protas RN, Kubrakov KM, Blokhin VA. Gunshot open penetrating craniocerebral injuries of adolescents in peacetime. Vitebsk medical jornal. 2005;4(1):78–81.
  19. Demyanenko VA, Kabanjan AB, Baidakov AP, Еrzhakov SV. Gun shot craniocerebral wound. A case from practice. Kuban Scientific Medical Bulletin. 2012;(6):82–85.
  20. Popov VE, Livshits MI, Manzhos PI, et al. Peculiarities of fire-fighting cerebral brain wound in peaceful times in children. Russian Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2018;22(1):42–47. doi: 10.18821/1560-9510-2018-22-1-42-47
  21. Chabulov ACh. Features of surgical treatment of gunshot wounds of the skull and brain in children. The Russian Journal of Neurosurgery. 2002;(3):46–48.
  22. Kardash AM, Listratenko AI, Kardash KA. Battle craniofacial injury in military actions in the megalopolis. International Research Journal. 2015;(10):58–60. doi: 10.18454/IRJ.2015.41.140
  23. Sellier KG, Kneubuehl BP. Wound ballistics: And the scientific background. 1st edition. by Elsevier Published, 1994. 479 p.
  24. Giran G, Bertin H, Koudougou C, et al. About a pediatric facial trauma. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;120(2):154–156. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2018.11.001
  25. Reisch R, Perneczky A, Filippi R. Surgical technique of the supraorbital key-hole craniotomy. Surg Neurol. 2003;59(3):223–227. doi: 10.1016/s0090-3019(02)01037-6
  26. Shapkin YuG, Seliverstov PA, Stekolnikov NYu. World’s trauma registries: history, modern problems and ways of their solution. Polytrauma. 2021;(3):103–111. doi: 10.24412/1819-1495-2021-3-103-111

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. View of the child’s face upon admission. Entry hole of the wound canal in the dorsum of the nose

Download (52KB)
3. Fig. 2. X-ray images of the skull bones revealed an embedded foreign body, identified during subsequent surgery as a bullet from the 18 × 45T cartridge: а — shadow of a foreign body, direct projection; b — shadow of a foreign body, lateral projection

Download (119KB)
4. Fig. 3. Computed tomography of the skull (visualization in the bone mode): a — lateral projection — foreign body in the area of the left orbit and ethmoidal labyrinth; b — transverse section at the level of a foreign body; c — transverse section — the arrow points to the comminuted fractures of the medial wall of the orbit on the left

Download (157KB)
5. Fig. 4. Stages of surgery: a — marking of the supraorbital trans-eyebrow approach; b — incision of the skin and subcutaneous tissue; c — layer-by-layer tissue dissection; d — at the bottom of the wound is a bullet from a traumatic pistol; e — blunt extraction and bullet removal; f — view of the face after surgery

Download (643KB)
6. Fig. 5. Removed rubber bullet with metal core

Download (30KB)
7. Fig. 6. Computed tomography of the skull with 3D reconstruction and frontal projection

Download (40KB)
8. Fig. 7. Patient’s face upon hospital discharge

Download (20KB)
9. Fig. 8. Screenshot collage from news feeds of new

Download (80KB)

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies