Water Vapor Transport in Poly(2,6-Dimethyl-1,4-Phenylene Oxide)

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

Poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) (PPO)-based membranes have been widely used in industry to separate various gas mixtures. Although there is a lot of data on the gas permeability of PPO in the literature, the water vapor permeability data of PPO is largely lacking. In this paper, the water vapor transport in amorphous PPO at 35 and 50°C with the water vapor activity from 0.2 to 0.8 was investigated. For this purpose, a laboratory sample of amorphous PPO-based composite membrane was prepared. As a result, the dependences of the water vapor permeability coefficient on vapor activity were obtained. Both dependences (for 35 and 50 °C) illustrated almost the same level of permeability and a tendency to decrease the water vapor permeability coefficient by about 17% with the vapor activity increase from 0 to 1. The obtained results can be used in the design and operation of membrane separation systems with PPO-based membranes in the presence of water vapor in the separated mixture.

Sobre autores

D. Miroshnichenko

A.V. Topchiev Institute of Petrochemical Synthesis, Russian Academy of Sciences

Moscow, Russian Federation

A. Kozlova

A.V. Topchiev Institute of Petrochemical Synthesis, Russian Academy of Sciences

Moscow, Russian Federation

L. Gasanova

A.V. Topchiev Institute of Petrochemical Synthesis, Russian Academy of Sciences

Moscow, Russian Federation

V. Teplyakov

A.V. Topchiev Institute of Petrochemical Synthesis, Russian Academy of Sciences

Moscow, Russian Federation

M. Shalygin

A.V. Topchiev Institute of Petrochemical Synthesis, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: mshalygin@ips.ac.ru
Moscow, Russian Federation

Bibliografia

  1. Liang C.Z., Chung T.S. // Sep. Pur. Tech. 2018. V. 202. P. 345–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2018.03.005
  2. Baker R., Lokhandwala K. // Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008. V. 47. P. 2109–2121. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie071083w
  3. Bolto B., Hoang M., Xie Z. // Water Res. 2012. V. 46. P. 259–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.10.052
  4. Lin H., Thompson S.M., Serbanescu-Martin A., Wijmans J.G., Amo K.D., Lokhandwala K.A., Merkel T.C. // J. Membr. Sci. 2012. V. 413–414. P. 70–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.04.009
  5. Lin H., Thompson S.M., Serbanescu-Martin A., Wijmans J.G., Amo K.D., Lokhandwala K.A., Low B.T., Merkel T.C. // J. Membr. Sci. 2013. V. 432. P. 106–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.12.049
  6. Shalygin M., Kozlova A., Teplyakov V. // Membr. Membr. Technol. 2022. V. 4. P. 258–266. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2517751622040084
  7. Yane L.M. // J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2019. V. 94. № 2. P. 343–365. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.6264
  8. Kujawski W. // Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2000. V. 9. № 1. P. 13–26. https://www.pjoes.com/pdf-87272-211312filename=Application%20of.pdf
  9. Tanaka K., Islam M.I.N., Kido M., Kita H., Okamoto K. // Polymer. 2006. V. 47. № 12. P. 4370–4377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2006.04.001
  10. Ansaloni L., Minelli M., Giacinti Baschetti M.G., Sarit G.C. // J. Membr. Sci. 2014. V. 471. P. 392–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2014.08.019
  11. Olivieri L., Tena A., Grazia De Angelis M., Gimenez A.H., Lozano A.E., Sarit G.C. // Green Energy Environ. 2016. V. 1. № 3. P. 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gee.2016.09.002
  12. Dai Z., Ansaloni L., Ryan J.J., Spontak R.J., Deng L. // Green Chem. 2018. V. 20. P. 1391–1404. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ge03727a
  13. Ovogina K.V., Alaskin A.A., Trulyanov M.M. et al. // Membr. Membr. Technol. 2020. V. 2. P. 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2517751620020092
  14. Metz S.J., van de Ven W.J.C. et al. // J. Membr. Sci. 2005. V. 251. № 1–2. P. 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2004.08.036
  15. Yave W. // J. Membr. Sci. Res. 2019. V. 5. P. 216–221. https://www.msrijournal.com/article_32108_0.html
  16. Farhan N.M., Ibrahim S.S., Leva L., Yave W., Alsally Q.F. // Chem. Eng. Process: Process Intensif. 2022. V. 174. P. 108863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2022.108863
  17. Moon S.I., Extrand C.W. // Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2009. V. 48. № 19. P. 8961–8965. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie900842t
  18. Chen G.Q., Scholes C.A., Qiao G.G., Kentish S.E. // J. Membr. Sci. 2011. V. 379. № 1–2. P. 479–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.06.023
  19. Chen G.Q., Kanehashi S., Doherty C.M., Hill A.J., Kentish S.E. // J. Membr. Sci. 2015. V. 487. P. 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.03.074
  20. Chowdhury G.G., Kruczek B., Matsuura T. // Gas, Vapor Liq. Sep. 2001. P. 334. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1483-1
  21. Hazarika Gauri, Pravin G. // Materials Today Chemistry. 2024. V. 38. P. 102109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtchem.2024.102109
  22. Membrane modules for nitrogen and oxygen generator systems // Parker Filtration and Separation. Technology Overview – URL: https://ph.parker.com/us/en/category/air-preparation-frl-and-dryers
  23. JSC “Research and Production Association (RPA) Geliymash” – Modern cryogenic gas technologies – URL: http://geliymash.ru/
  24. Belassadou B., Claveria-Baro J., Lorenzo-Hernando A., Zaititza D.A., Chabanon E., Castel Ch., Rode S., Roizard D., Favre E. // J. Membr. Sci. 2016. V. 513. P. 236–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.04.037
  25. Khayet M. et al. // J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2004. V. 278. № 2. P. 410–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2004.06.021
  26. Alentiev A.Y., Chirkov S.V., Nikiforov R.Y. et al. // Membr. Membr. Technol. 2022. V. 4. P. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2517751622010036
  27. Alentiev A.Y., Levin I.S., Belov N.A., Nikiforov R.Y., Chirkov S.V., Beggin D.A., Ryzhikh V.E., Kostina J.V., Shantarovich V.P., Grunin L.Y. // Polymers. 2022. V. 14. № 1. P. 120. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14010120
  28. Alentiev A.Y., Levin I.S., Buzin M.I., Belov N.A., Nikiforov R.Y., Chirkov S.V., Blagodatskikh I.V., Kechekyan A.S., Kechekyan P.A., Beleshev V.G., Ryzhikh V.E., Yampolskii Yu.P. // Polymer. 2021. V. 226. P. 123804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2021.123804
  29. Kee Hong Kim, Pravin G. Ingole, Hyung Keun Lee // International J. of Hydrogen Energy. 2017. V. 42. № 38. P. 24205–24212, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.08.018
  30. Shalygin M.G., Kozlova A.A., Syrisova D.A. et al. // Membr. Membr. Technol. 2019. V. 1. P. 183–189. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2517751619030053
  31. Allen S.M., Fujii M., Stannett V., Hopfenberg H.B., Williams J.L. // J. Membr. Sci. 1977. V. 2. P. 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(00)83241-X
  32. Teplyakov V.V., Shalygin M.G., Kozlova A.A., et al. // Pet. Chem. 2018. V. 58. P. 949–957. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965544118110075
  33. Beckman I.N., Syrisova D.A., Shalygin M.G., Kandasamy P., Teplyakov V.V. // J. Membr. Sci. 2020. V. 601. P. 117737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117737
  34. Reijerkerk S. R. et al. // International J. of Greenhouse Gas Control. 2011. V. 5. №. 1. P. 26–36.
  35. Potreck J. et al. // J. of Membrane Sci. 2009. V. 338. №. 1–2. P. 11–16.
  36. Despond S., Espuche E., Domard A. // J. of Polymer Sci. Part B: Polymer Physics. 2001. V. 39. №. 24. P. 3114–3127.
  37. Detallante V. et al. // Desalination. 2002. V. 148. №. 1–3. V. 333–339.
  38. Chen G., Scholes C., Qiao G., Kentish S. // J. Membr. Sci. 2011. V. 379. P. 479–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.06.023
  39. Mulder M. // Springer science and business media. 1996. V. 564. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-94-009-1766-8

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar

Declaração de direitos autorais © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2025

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).