Meshless sacrocolpopexy for post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: vascularized flap technique. Case report. Video case**

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The absence of rigid fixation point, tissue atrophy and multi-compartment defects make post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse a real challenge for the surgeon. The gold standard for treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse is sacrocolpopexy. Unfortunately, this approach does not allow to perform reliable long-term meshless reconstruction in the anterior and posterior compartments. Moreover, the use of a mesh is associated with the risk of erosion. Aim – to show the possibility of replacing a standard mesh with a vaginal flap during laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. A 60-year-old patient with post-hysterectomy prolapse stage III underwent meshless laparoscopic vaginal-assisted sacrocolpopexy. The duration of the surgery was 105 min (35 min vaginal part and 70 min LS part). Intraoperative blood loss was 55 ml. No intraoperative and early postoperative complications were recorded. According to the ultrasound postvoiding residual was 35 ml, hematomas in the operation area were not visualized. During the exam in 12 months after the surgery, no signs of POP (Aa -2 Ba -3 C -8 Ap -3 Bp -3 tvl 9 gh 4 pb 3), erosion and any pain were detected. The results of the questionnaires were as follows: PFDI-20 – 22,92, PISQ-12 – 31 and ICIQ-SF – 1. According to ultrasound the volume of residual urine was 0 ml. This approach allows to eliminate completely the risk of erosion and create a unified plastic natural construction from the vaginal cuff and tailored flap.

About the authors

Nikita D. Kubin

Saint Petersburg State University

Email: nikitakubin@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5189-4639

D. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Dmitry D. Shkarupa

Saint Petersburg State University

Email: shkarupa.dmitry@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0489-3451

D. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Alexander S. Basos

Saint Petersburg State University

Email: a.s.basos@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5020-9759

Cand. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Andrei S. Shulgin

Saint Petersburg State University

Email: shulginandrey74@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8655-7234

Cand. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Ivan A. Labetov

Saint Petersburg State University

Email: ivanlabetov@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9813-7483

urologist

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Rustam A. Shakhaliev

Saint Petersburg State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: rustam.shahaliev@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2450-7044

obstetrician-gynecologist

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Denis A. Suchkov

Saint Petersburg State University

Email: denis.urolog@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0649-9434

urologist

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

References

  1. Wright JD, Herzog TJ, Tsui J, et al. Nationwide trends in the performance of inpatient hysterectomy in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(2 Pt 1):233-41. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318299a6cf
  2. Dällenbach P, Kaelin-Gambirasio I, Jacob S, et al. Incidence rate and risk factors for vaginal vault prolapse repair after hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J. 2008;19(12):1623-9. doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0718-4
  3. Coolen AWM, Bui BN, Dietz V, et al. The treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(12):1767-83. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3493-2
  4. Pacquée S, Nawapun K, Claerhout F, et al. Long-Term Assessment of a Prospective Cohort of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;134(2):323-32. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003380
  5. Nygaard I, Brubaker L, Zyczynski HM, et al. Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. JAMA. 2013;309(19):2016-24. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.4919
  6. Takacs EB, Kreder KJ. Sacrocolpopexy: Surgical Technique, Outcomes, and Complications. Curr Urol Rep. 2016;17(12):90. doi: 10.1007/s11934-016-0643-x
  7. Athanasiou S, Zacharakis D, Protopapas A, et al. Severe pelvic organ prolapse. Is there a long-term cure? Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(10):1697-703. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3775-3
  8. Tate SB, Blackwell L, Lorenz DJ, et al. Randomized trial of fascia lata and polypropylene mesh for abdominal sacrocolpopexy: 5-year follow-up. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(2):137-43. doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1249-3

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Deepithelialized vascularized flap of the posterior vaginal wall.

Download (138KB)
3. Fig. 2. End of the vaginal stage of surgery.

Download (159KB)
4. Fig. 3. The vaginal flap is fixed to the anterior longitudinal ligament of the spine at the level of the sacral promontory.

Download (164KB)

Copyright (c) 2022 Consilium Medicum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).