Modeling assessments of synergy effects under organizational activity in the system of natural monopoly characteristics
- Authors: Belousova N.I.1, Bushansky S.P.2
-
Affiliations:
- Federal Research Center “Computer Science and Control” of Russian Academy of Sciences
- Central Economics and Mathematics Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences
- Issue: Vol 74, No 3 (2024)
- Pages: 3-12
- Section: Methods and Models of Systems Analysis
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2079-0279/article/view/293350
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.14357/20790279240301
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/DRBVPJ
- ID: 293350
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Theoretical and applied approaches to assessing synergy effects under organizational activity are researched based on the models and techniques of the modern natural monopoly theory for solving problems of analysis and strategic design for infrastructure subsystems. The relationships between adequate theoretical foundation of effective market organization and the approaches to assessing natural monopoly synergy are analyzed. Within the normative identification, approaches to assessing the synergetic effects using key technological determinants/ natural monopoly activity indicators have been elaborated. The directions are determined for analyzing factors associated with assessing synergy effects within the framework of theoretical concepts of behavioral identification, and, accordingly, expanding the set of using characteristics. Some measures of state regulation related to the formation of market economic behavior of natural monopolist, primarily pricing behavior, are highlighted; these measures determine the possibility of adjusting estimates of synergy effects under organizational activity.
Keywords
About the authors
N. I. Belousova
Federal Research Center “Computer Science and Control” of Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: natabel.52@mail.ru
Leading Researcher, Doctor (Economy)
Russian Federation, MoscowS. P. Bushansky
Central Economics and Mathematics Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences
Author for correspondence.
Email: dbd-s@yandex.ru
Phd (Economics), Senior Researcher
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- Baumol W.J., Panzar J.C., Willig R.D. Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure. N.Y.: HBJ; 1982. 497 p.
- Baumol W.J., Willig R.D. Contestability: development since the book. Oxford Economic Papers, New Series. Supplement: Strategic Behavior and Industrial Competition. 1986; 38 (Nov.): 9-36.
- Belousova N.I., Vasil’eva E.M. Issues of the Theory of State Regulation and Identification of Natural Monopolies. M.: KomKniga; 2006. 320 p. (in Russ.).
- Belousova N.I., Vasil’eva E.M., Livshitz V.N. Models of identification of natural monopolies and their state regulation (opportunities for expanding the classical theory). Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody. 2012; 48(3): 64–78 (in Russ.).
- Belousova N.I., Vasil’eva E.M. Diagnostics of network infrastructure technologies properties under reforming the system of Russian natural monopolies state reegulation. Rossijskij e`konomicheskij zhurnal. 2019; 3: 25-35. doi: 10.33983/0130-9757-2019-3-25-35 (In Russ.).
- Belousova N.I., Bushanskij S.P., Vasil’eva E.M., Vasil’ev V.B. Natural monopoly properties of transport networks: multiproduct models of diagnostics. Audit i finansovy`j analiz. 2018; 2: 129–147 (In Russ.).
- Box G.E.P., Cox D.R.An analysis of transformations. Journal of Royal Statistical Society. Ser. B (Methodological). 1964; 26(2): 211-252.
- Pulley L.B., Braunstein Y.M. A composite cost function for multiproduct firms with an application to economies of scope in banking. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 1992; 74(2): 221-230.
- Roller L.H. Proper quadratic cost functions with an applications to the Bell System. The Review of Economics and Statistics.1990; 72(2): 202-210.
- Shephard R.W. Cost and Production Functions. N.Y.: Princeton University Press; 1953. 104p.
- Belousova N.I., Vasil’eva E.M. Approaches to the assessment of infrastructure technologies with the inclusion of hedonic factors and risk conditions. In: system modeling of socio-economic processes: Proceedings of the 44th International Scientific school-seminar named acad. S.S. Shatalin. 4-9 October 2021, Voronezh: Istoki Publishing House; 2021. P.75-78. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.5701385 (In Russ.).
- Belousova N.I., Bushanskij S.P., Vasil’eva E.M., Mironova I.A. On modeling assessments of natural monopoly synergy. Audit i finansovy`j analiz. 2023; 5: 4-10 (In Russ.).
- Belousova N.I., Vasil’eva E.M. Natural monopoly activity indicators: theoretic and applied aspects of analysis. Trudy ISA RAN. 2018; 68(3): 69-82. doi: 10.14357/20790279180307 (In Russ.).
- Belousova N.I., Vasil’eva E.M. Effective organization of the industry market and assessment of natural monopoly synergy. In: Kleiner G.B. (ed.): strategic planning and enterprise development: Proceedings of the XXV All- Russian Symposium. 9-10 April 2024, Moscow: CEMI RAS; 2024. P.35-38 (In. Russ.).
- Tirol` Zh. Markets and Market Power: Theory of Industrial Organization / Ed. by V.A. Galperin, N.A.Zenkevich. Vol. 1-2. St. Petersburg: Economic School; 2000. Vol.1-328p. Vol.2- 450p. (In Russ.). (Tirole J. The Theory of Industrial Organization. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1988, 1992, 1997).
- Baumol W.J., Sidak J.G. The pricing of input sold to competitors. Yale Journal on Regulation. 1994; 11(1):171-202.
- Baumol W.J., Ordover J.A., Willig R.D. Parity pricing and its critics: a necessary condition for efficiency in the provision of bottleneck services to competitors. Yale Journal on Regulation. 1997; 14(1):145-163.
- Baumol W.J., Willig R.D. Competitive rail regulation rules: should price celling constrain final products or inputs? Journal of Transport Economics and Policy. 1999; 33(1):43-53.
- Laffont J.-J., Tirole J. Access pricing and competition. European Economic Review. 1994; 38(9): 1673–1710.
- Laffont J.-J., Tirole J. Creating competition through interconnection: theory and practice. Journal of Regulatory Economics. 1996; 10(3): 227-256.
- Amstrong M. Network interconnection in telecommunications. Economic Journal. 1998; 108 (448): 545-564.
- Evans D., Heckman J. A Test for subadditivity of the cost function with an application to the Bell System. American Economic Review. 1984; 74(4): 615-623.
- Evans D., Heckman J. A test for subadditivity of the cost function with the application to the Bell System: Erratum. American Economic Review. 1986; 76(4): 856-858.
- Sueyoshi T. Divestiture of Nippon Telegraph and Telephone. Management Science. 1996; 42(9):1326-1351.
- Sueyoshi T. Measuring effectiveness and returns of scale of Nippon Telegraph &Telephone in production and cost analyses. Management Science. 1997; 43(6): 779-796.
Supplementary files
