TRUNK BALANCE IN PATIENTS WITH CERVICAL SPINAL CORD INJURY

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Aim. To determine the influence of the trunk balance in the sitting position on the degree of functional independence in patients with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). Materials and methods. The study involved 40 patients with SCI who were assessed for dynamic and static balance (motor tasks of the Van Luchot test, angulometry of the pelvis in the sitting position), motor skills of functional independence (motor subscale FIM) and neurological deficit (standard ASIA) were also observed. The control group for assessing the position of the pelvis included 20 relatively healthy subjects, comparable by sex and age. Results. The influence of the pelvic flexion position and the severity of neurological deficit on the trunk balance was found, a correlation between the ability to perform a number of self-care skills and body balance indicators was found elso, a positive relationship was found between the flexion position of the pelvis and the time since SCI. Conclusions. The balance of the body (reaching forward), the position of the pelvis are important components that affect the degree of functional independence of patients with cervical SCI.

About the authors

Fedor A. Bushkov

Rehabilitation center for disabled people “Overcoming”

Email: bushkovfedor@mail.ru
канд. мед. наук, врач-невролог Moscow, Russia

Elena V. Romanovskaya

Rehabilitation center for disabled people “Overcoming”

ст. эрготерапевт Moscow, Russia

Elena V. Usanova

Rehabilitation center for disabled people “Overcoming”

эрготерапевт Moscow, Russia

Liia A. Fedotkina

Rehabilitation center for disabled people “Overcoming”

инструктор по социально-бытовой адаптации Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Лившиц А.В., Гольфанд В.Б. Сов. Медицина. 1976; 3: 77-80. @@Livshits A.V., Gol'fand V.B. Sov. Meditsina. 1976; 3: 77-80 (in Russian).
  2. Kirshblum SC et al. Predicting neurological recovery in traumatic cervical spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79 (11): 1456-66.
  3. Ditunno J. Predicting recovery after spinal cord injury: a rehabilitation imperative. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1999; 80 (4): 361-4.
  4. Post MWM, van Asbeck FWA, van Dijk AJ, Schrijvers AJP. Services for spinal cord injured: availability and satisfaction. Spinal Cord 1997; 35: 109-15.
  5. Anderson KD. Targeting recovery: Priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. J Neurotrauma. 2004; 21 (10): 1371-83.
  6. Kamper D, Barin K, Parnianpour M et al. Preliminary investigation of the lateral postural stability of spinal cord-injured individuals subjected to dynamic perturbations. Spinal Cord. 1999; 37 (1): 40-6.
  7. Sprigle S, Maurer C, Holowka M. Development of valid and reliable measures of postural stability. J Spinal Cord Med. 2007; 30 (1): 40-9.
  8. Curtis KF, Kindlin COM, Reich KM, Whit DE. Functional reach in wheelchair users: the effects of trunk and lower extremity stabilization. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76: 360-67.
  9. Maurer CL et al. Effect of seat inclination on seated pressure of individuals with spinal cord injury. Phys Ther2004;84:255-61.
  10. Harms M. Effect on wheelchair design on posture and comfort of users. Physiotherapy 1990; 76: 226-71.
  11. Hobson DA, Tooms RE. Seated lumbar/pelvic alignment. A comparison between spinal-cord injured and non injured groups. Spine 1992; 17: 293-98.
  12. Samuelsson K, Larson H, Thyberg M, Tropp H. Back pain and spinal deformity - common among wheelchair users with spinal cord injuries. Scand J Occupational Ther 1996; 3: 28-32.
  13. Bolin I, Bodin P, Kreuter M. Sitting position - Posture and performance in C5-C6 tetraplegia. Spinal Cord 2000; 38: 425-34.
  14. Jergensen V, Elfving B, Opheim A. Assessment of unsupported sitting in patients with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2011; 49 (7): 838-43.
  15. Kirshblum SC, Burns SP Biering-Sorensen F et al. International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (Revised 2011). J Spinal Cord Med 2011; 34 (6): 535-46. doi: 10.1179/204577211X13207446293695
  16. Hall KM, Cohen ME, Wright J et al. Characteristics of the Functional Independence Measure in traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80 (11): 1471-6.
  17. Бушков Ф.А., Романовская Е.В., Усанова Е.В., Федоткина Л.Е. Значение теста Ван-Люшот в оценке функции верхней конечности у пациентов с цервикальной тетраплегией. Фарматека. Журн. для практикующих врачей. 2019; 3; 51-6. DOI: https: //dx.doi.org/10.18565/pharmateca.2019.3.00-00
  18. Do MC, Bouisset S, Moynot C. Are paraplegics handicapped in the execution of a manual task? Ergonomics. 1985;28:1365-75.
  19. Sprigle S, Wootten M, Sawacha Z, Thielman G. Relationships among cushion type, backrest height, seated posture, and reach of wheelchair users with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2003; 26 (3): 236-43.
  20. Michaelsen SM, Luta A, Roby-Brami A, Levin MF. Effect of trunk restraint on the recovery of reaching movements in hemiparetic patients. Stroke 2001; 32 (8): 1875-83. doi: 10.1161/01.str.32.8.1875
  21. Lynch SM, Leahy P, Barker SP. Reliability of measurements obtained with a modified functional reach test in subjects with spinal cord injury. Phys Ther 1998; 78: 128-33.

Copyright (c) 2020 Consilium Medicum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies