Analysis of clinical risk factors for complications of periferal venous catheterization
- Authors: Arkhireeva L.Y.1,2, Midlenko O.V.1, Midlenko V.I.1, Arkhireeva A.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Ulyanovsk State University
- St. Andrew the Apostle the First-Called City Clinical Hospital
- Issue: Vol 27, No 12 (2025): Comorbidity in internal medicine
- Pages: 807-811
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2075-1753/article/view/380233
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.26442/20751753.2025.12.203405
- ID: 380233
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Background. Peripheral venous catheterization (PVC) is one of the most frequently performed invasive procedures in hospital practice. It is widely used for administration of infusion solutions, medications, and blood products. Despite its relative simplicity and perceived safety, PVC is often accompanied by local complications that may worsen clinical outcomes and patient discomfort. Identification of clinical risk factors for complicated PVC remains an important task for improving the quality of vascular access and optimizing patient management strategies.
Aim. To identify statistically significant clinical predictors of complicated peripheral venous catheterization and to assess their impact on the development of catheter-related complications.
Materials and methods. The study included 167 cases of PVC performed in surgical and rehabilitation departments. Demographic and clinical characteristics were analyzed, including patient age, body mass index, history of previous PVC-related complications, vein visualization and palpation prior to puncture, catheter gauge, duration of catheter placement, and features of the catheterization technique. The frequency and structure of local complications were evaluated. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used with calculation of odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals.
Results. Complications were identified in 66.5% of cases. The most common were pain at the catheter insertion site (25.2%), phlebitis (15.3%), extravasation (12.6%), hematoma (10.2%), and catheter obstruction (8.4%). Significant risk factors for complicated PVC included a history of complications (OR=15.6), small vein diameter (OR=5.38), absence of vein visualization or palpation prior to puncture (OR=3.40), catheter dwell time exceeding 48 hours (OR=3.12), BMI>28 (OR=4.00), and age over 18 years (OR=3.53).
Conclusion. Several clinical parameters were identified as significant predictors of complications associated with PVC. Consideration of these factors enables early risk stratification, supports justified selection of vascular access techniques, and allows for individualized patient management. Implementation of a risk-based approach to PVC may contribute to reducing complication rates, improving procedural safety, and enhancing the overall quality of medical care.
About the authors
Larisa Yu. Arkhireeva
Ulyanovsk State University; St. Andrew the Apostle the First-Called City Clinical Hospital
Author for correspondence.
Email: arkhireevalarisa@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0002-3801-1672
SPIN-code: 7354-7766
Assistant of Professor
Russian Federation, Ulyanovsk; UlyanovskOleg V. Midlenko
Ulyanovsk State University
Email: arkhireevalarisa@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8076-7145
D. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, UlyanovskVladimir I. Midlenko
Ulyanovsk State University
Email: arkhireevalarisa@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4358-8484
D. Sci. (Med.), Prof.
Russian Federation, UlyanovskAnastasia A. Arkhireeva
Ulyanovsk State University
Email: arkhireevalarisa@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0003-9970-5587
Clinical Resident
Russian Federation, UlyanovskReferences
- Ураков А.Л., Уракова Н.А., Ловцова Л.В., Занозина О.В. Термодинамические основы диагностики воспаления мягких тканей в области постинъекционных кровоподтеков. Исследования по диссертационным темам. 2015;4:228-32 [Urakov AL, Urakova NA, Lovtsova LV, Zanozina OV. Termodinamicheskie osnovy diagnostiki vospalenia miagkikh tkanei v oblasti postinektsionnykh krovopodtekov. Issledovania po dissertatsionnym temam. 2015;4:228-32 (in Russian)].
- Boyd S, Aggarwal I, Davey P, et al. Peripheral intravenous catheters: the road to quality improvement and safer patient care. J Hosp Infect. 2011;77(1):37-41.
- Буйденок Ю.В. Современные подходы к обеспечению длительного венозного доступа в онкологии. Онкология. Журнал им. П.А. Герцена. 2021;10(3):69-78 [Buydenok YuV. Modern approaches for long-term venous access in oncology. P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2021;10(3):69-78 (in Russian)].
- Mermel LA. Short-term Peripheral Venous Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections: A Systematic Review. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65(10):1757-62. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix562
- Венозный катетер. Использование, уход, контроль, осложнения. Уч. пособие для врачей, ординаторов, аспирантов, медицинских сестер. М., 2023 [Venoznyi kateter. Ispolzovanie, ukhod, kontrol, oslozhneniia. Uch. posobie dlia vrachei, ordinatorov, aspirantov, meditsinskikh sester. Moscow, 2023 (in Russian)].
- Taşkın O, Günay İsmailoğlu E. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Difficult Intravenous Access Scale for adult patients. J Res Nurs. 2024;29(1):219. doi: 10.1177/17449871241226586
- Paterson RS, Schults JA, Slaughter E, et al. Peripheral intravenous catheter insertion in adult patients with difficult intravenous access: a systematic review of assessment instruments, clinical practice guidelines and escalation pathways. Emerg Med Australas. 2022;34(6):870-81. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.14069
- Rodríguez-Calero MA, Blanco-Mavillard I, Morales-Asencio JM, et al. Defining risk factors associated with difficult peripheral venous cannulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart Lung. 2020;49(3):273-86.
- de la Vieja-Soriano M, Blanco-Daza M, Macip-Belmonte S, et al. Difficult intravenous access in a paediatric intensive care unit. Enferm Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2022;33(2):67-76.
- van Loon FHJ, van Hooff LWE, de Boer HD, et al. The Modified A-DIVA Scale as a predictive tool for prospective identification of adult patients at risk of a difficult intravenous access: a multicenter validation study. J Clin Med. 2019;8(2):144. doi: 10.3390/jcm8020144
- Национальное общество специалистов по сосудистому доступу. Периферический венозный доступ. Методические рекомендации. М.: НОССКД, 2021. Режим доступа: https://nasskd.ru/recommendations/pivc_2021.pdf. Дата обращения 18.07.2025 [Perifericheskii venoznyi dostup. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii. Moscow: NOSSKD, 2021. Available at: https://nasskd.ru/recommendations/pivc_2021.pdf. Accessed: 18.07.2025 (in Russian)].
- Межрегиональная общественная организация «Общество врачей и медицинских сестер». Венозный доступ. Методические руководства. М., 2019; с. 82 [Mezhregionalnaia obshchestvennaia organizatsia “Obshchestvo vrachei i meditsinskikh sester”. Venoznyi dostup. Metodicheskie rukovodstva. Moscow, 2019; p. 82 (in Russian)].
- Yeguas VA, Lopez MAT, Serrano EM, et al. Vascular access care in patients with multimorbidity. Br J Nurs. 2021;30(8):S26-35. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2021.30.8.s2
Supplementary files

