Corporeal turn in human sciences: contemporary dimensions of the body


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Over the past decades, a person-centered approach has been widely used in human sciences which include both humanities and social sciences. Within this approach, an individual is studied comprehensively including their physical, emotional and spiritual health, communication and behavioral practices, moral values and ethical principles. Firstly evolved in western philosophy and aesthetics via practicing corporal intents, corporeal practices were later introduced into human sciences. The article defines corporeal culture and identifies the major development vectors which include physical, emotional and spiritual health, beauty, sexuality, comfort and diet. It also identifies underlying influences shaping the contours of corporeal culture which has a profound impact on generating human behavioral, social, cultural and communication practices.

About the authors

V. V. Zhura

Volgograd State Medical University

Email: vvzhura@gmail.com
Doctor of Science (Linguistics), assistant professor, head of the Department of Modern Languages with a Course of Latin Volgograd

Yu. V. Rudova

Volgograd State Medical University

Email: juliarud@inbox.ru
Candidate of Science (Linguistics), assistant Professor of the Department of Modern Languages with a Course of Latin Volgograd

References

  1. Feminist Perspectives on the Body. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2014.
  2. Grosz, E. Volatile Bodies: Towards a Corporeal Feminism, London: Routledge,1994.
  3. Jagger, L. The Body, Culture and Society. USA: Open University Press, 2000.
  4. Featherstone, M. The aestheticization of everyday life in Consumer Culture and Postmodernism. London: Sage, 1991.
  5. Giddens, A. Modernity and self-identity. Oxford: Polity, 1991.
  6. Goffman, E. The presentation of self in everyday life. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1971.
  7. Pottgieter F. Reinstating the body in Western philosophical and artistic practices, 2008.
  8. Kant I., Critique of pure reason. Transl. by N Kemp-Smith. 2nd impr. London: MacMillan, 1933.
  9. Gilleard C., Higgs P. Aging, Embodiment, and the Somatic Turn, 2012.
  10. Encyclopedia of Ancient Greece, New York. Routledge, 2006.
  11. Outline for a Study Group on World Health and the Survival of the Human Race. Material drawn from articles and speeches by Brock Chisholm. Geneva: WHO Available from: whqlibdoc.who.int/his1/../ChisholmBrock 1953 Compilatio n.pdf
  12. Zhura V.V., Rudova Yu. V. Korporealnaya kultura kak otrazheniye protsessa medikalizatsii obschestva i eyo representatsiya d meditsinskom diskurse // Gumanitarnye i sotsialnye nauki. - № 2. - 2014. - С. 551-554.
  13. Petrov V.V.Bioethics and personalized medicine. Bioethics, 2014, no. 2, pp. 5-6.
  14. Sedova N. N., Basov A. V. Ethical parameters of personalized medicine. Bioethics, 2015, no. 2. (16), pp. 23-28.
  15. Turner B.S. The Discourse of Diet. Theory, Culture and Society, 1(1). 1982.
  16. Kirby K.J. An Existential-Phenomenological Investigation of Women’s Experience of Becoming Less Obsessed with their Bodily Appearance. Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology. V.16. Special Edition, 2016.
  17. Moss, D. Brain, body, and world: Body image and the psychology of the body. New York: Plenum Press, 1989.
  18. Zhura V.V., Rudova Yu.V.Bioethical aspects of medical discourse. 2016. Bioethics. № 1(16) - P.42-46

Copyright (c) 2017 Zhura V.V., Rudova Y.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies