Implementation of bioethic principles in the evaluation of the patient’s status and role in written medical interaction
- Authors: Zhura V.V1, Semenova E.G1
-
Affiliations:
- Volgograd State Medical University
- Issue: Vol 13, No 1 (2020)
- Pages: 35-39
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2070-1586/article/view/55367
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.19163/2070-1586-2020-1(25)-35-39
- ID: 55367
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article explored the fact that various bioethical principles underlie the evaluation of the patient’s status and role in therapeutic interactions in written medical documents. We have found that characterization of biomedical, social and behavioural aspects of the patient’s existence relies on such bioethical principles as obligation, truthfulness, respect for human rights and dignity, the patient’s good. A few facts of the violation of the principle of respect for human rights and dignity consisting in verbal stigmatization have been provided. Bioethical perspective is also taken to evaluate the mode and extent of the patient’s involvement in a medical interaction, which are either negatively or positively assessed based on the patient’s compliance and good.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
V. V Zhura
Volgograd State Medical University
Email: vvzhura@gmail.com
Doctor of Philology, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Foreign Languages with a Latin Language Course
E. G Semenova
Volgograd State Medical University
Email: yaitskova@mail.ru
Senior Lecturer in the Department of Foreign Languages with a Latin Language Course
References
- Acute epigastric pain - case study by Dr Louise Newson on the 3 May 2017. URL: https://www.gponline.com/acute-epigastric-pain-case-study/gi-tract/article/1431336.
- Clinical Case Studies: Immunopaedia. URL: https://www.immunopaedia.org.za/clinical-cases.
- Goddu A. P., O’Conor K. J., Lanzkron S., Saheed M O., Saha S., Peek M. E., Haywood C., Beach M. C. Do Words Matter? Stigmatizing Language and the Transmission of Bias in the Medical Record // Journal of General Internal Medicine. -2018. - Vol. 33. - Issue 5. - P. 685-691.
- Hill T. E. How clinicians make (or avoid) moral judgments of patients: implications of the evidence for relationships and research // Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine. - 2010. - Vol. 5. - P. 5-11.
- Sample Written History and Physical Examination. URL: www.med.unc.edu/medclerk/files/2018/10/UMNwriteup.pdf.
- Van Ryn M., Burgess D., Malat J., Griffin J. Physicians’ Perceptions of Patients’ Social and Behavioral Characteristics and Race Disparities in Treatment Recommendations for Men With Coronary Artery Disease // American Journal of Public Health. - 2006. - Vol. 96 (2). -P. 351-357.
- Yarborough P. Case Study: A Patient With Type 2 Diabetes Working With an Advanced Practice Pharmacist to Address Interacting Comorbidities // Diabetes Spectrum. -2003. - Vol. 16 (1). - P. 41-48.