Ethical patterns of a new Federal act


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

A Federal Act N 180-ФЗ on "Biomedical cell products" passed on June 8, 2016 by the State Duma and on 15 June, 2016 by the Federation Council of the Russian Federation, came into force on January 1, 2017. To the best of our knowledge, and as evidenced by publications in this journal [1, 2], any legal document has moral implications, particularly a document regulating the attitudes and behavior towards all living things. In this relation the new act is viewed as a great step towards the development of bioethics in Russia. A number of bioethical issues involved in the previous act №323-ФЗ on «The basic issues of protection of human health in the Russian Federation» and №61-ФЗ «Handling of medicines» did not receive appropriate elucidation. The new act contains Article 14 on «Ethical expertise» which sets standards absent from act №323-ФЗ and recapitulates the substance of Article 17 of act №61-ФЗ. On the other hand, questions regarding organization of ethical expertise arise and require further discussion when developing subordinate local acts to ensure effective implementation of the new federal act in medical practice.

About the authors

V. I Petrov

Volgograd State Medical University of the Ministry ofPublic Health of the Russian Federation

Email: Editor-in-chief. post@volgmed.ru
Full Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Doctor of Science (Medicine), Professor, Rector

References

  1. Sedova N.N. All laws were once norms of morality, but not all moral norms become laws // Bioethics. 2009.- No. 1.- P. 37-42.
  2. Sedova N.N., Prize E.V. On ethical examination of bills in the sphere of public health // Bioethics. 2011. № 2. - P. 9-20
  3. Federal Law No. 180-FZ "On Biomedical Cell Products" // Rossiyskaya Gazeta - Federal Issue No. 7007 (139), June 28, 2016.
  4. Petrov VI, Sedova NN, Donika AD, Adzhienko V.L. What they forgot to say in the new law // Bioethics. 2011. - No. 2.- P. 26-25.
  5. Sedova N.N., Prize E.V. On ethical examination of bills in the sphere of public health // Bioethics. 2011. № 2. - P. 9-20.
  6. Ethical examination of biomedical research. Practical recommendations. Under the general revision of the corresponding member. RAMS, prof. Yu.B. Belousova. First edition. Moscow. 2005. - Part VIII.
  7. Donika A.D. Medical law: european traditions and international trends. Bioethics. № 2 (10). 2012. P.59-62.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2017 Petrov V.I.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).