Email this article Neuroethics of the cognitive impairment
- Authors: Muravyev S.V.1, Zhelnin A.I.1,2
-
Affiliations:
- Perm State Medical University named after Academician E.A. Vagner
- Perm State National Research University
- Issue: Vol 18, No 1 (2025)
- Pages: 41-47
- Section: Practical bioethics
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2070-1586/article/view/310118
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.19163/2070-1586-2025-18-1-41-47
- ID: 310118
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Neuroethics, being a specific kind of bioethics, is a striking example of the synthesis of traditional clinical challenges with dilemmas of modern biomedical progress. Some of its most complex problems are connected with the syndrome of cognitive impairment due to the extreme polymorphism of its manifestations, the variety of pathological conditions that give rise to it, the difficulties of its diagnosis and prevention and, finally, its direct harmful influence on the very subjective “core” of the human personality, destruction of the human Ego.
Keywords
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Sergey V. Muravyev
Perm State Medical University named after Academician E.A. Vagner
Email: sergey89.m@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3342-4710
Сandidate of Sciences in Medicine, Ass. Prof
Russian Federation, PermAnton I. Zhelnin
Perm State Medical University named after Academician E.A. Vagner; Perm State National Research University
Author for correspondence.
Email: zhelnin@psu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6368-1363
Candidate of Sciences in Philosophy, Associate Professor
Russian Federation, Perm; PermReferences
- Dubrovskij D.I. Problem of the Ideal. Subjective reality. Moscow, Kanon+, 2002. 366 p. (In Russ.).
- Luriya A.R. Foundations of neuropsychologyi. Moscow, Akademiya, 2013. 384 p. (In Russ.).
- Emelin A.Yu. Cognitive impairments in cerebrovascular disease: What is between health and dementia? Nevrologiya, neiropsikhiatriya, psikhosomatika = Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2015;7(1):94–98. (In Russ.) doi: 10.14412/2074-2711-2015-1-94-98.
- Levin O.S. Cognitive impairment in neurological practice. Moscow, MedPressInform, 2006. 258 p. (In Russ.).
- Podrezova L.A., Markina T.R., Seku Yu.V. Mental disorders in elderly therapeutic patients. Al'manah klinicheskoj mediciny = Almanac of Clinical Medicine. 2014;35:89–93. (In Russ.).
- Emelin A.Yu. The possibilities of diagnosing and treating cognitive impairment at non-dementia stages. Nevrologiya, neiropsikhiatriya, psikhosomatika = Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2020;12(5):78–83. (In Russ.) doi: 10.14412/2074-2711-2020-5-78-83.
- Zaharov V.V. Evolution of cognitive deficit: mild and moderate cognitive impairment. Nevrologiya, neiropsikhiatriya, psikhosomatika = Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2012;4:16–21. (In Russ.) doi: 10.14412/2074-2711-2012-376.
- Goldberg E. Excecutive brain: frontal lobes, leadership and civilization. Moscow, Smysl, 2003. 336 p. (In Russ.).
- Vygotskij L.S. Psychology of human development. Moscow, Eksmo, 2005. 1136 p. (In Russ.).
- Dajnikova E.I., Pizova N.V. Сognitive reserve and cognitive impairment – medicinal and non-medicinal methods of correction. Nevrologiya, neiropsikhiatriya, psikhosomatika = Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2014;6:62–68. (In Russ.) doi: 10.14412/2074-2711-2014-2S-62-68 .
- Yahno N.N. Kognitivnye rasstrojstva v nevrologicheskoj klinike Cognitive impairment in neurological clinic. Nevrologicheskii zhurnal. 2006;11:4–13. (In Russ.).
- Jessen F., Amariglio R.E., Buckley R.F., van der Flier W.M., Han Y., Molinuevoet J.L. et al. The characterisation of subjective cognitive decline. The Lancet Neurology. 2020;19(3);271–278. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30368-0.
- Petersen R.S., Smith G.E., Waring S.C., Ivnik R.J., Kokmen E., Tangelos E.G. Aging, memory and mild cognitive impairment. International psychogeriatrics. 1997;9:37–43.
- Lee J. Mild cognitive impairment in relation to Alzheimer’s disease: An investigation of principles, classifications, ethics, and problems. Neuroethics. 2023;16(2):16. doi: 10.1007/s12152-023-09522-5.
- Ritchie K., Artero S., Touchon J. Classification criteria for mild cognitive impairment: a population-based validation study. Neurology. 2001;56(1):37–42. doi: 10.1212/wnl.56.1.37.
- Leng R.D. The split self. Moscow, Institute for General Humanitarian Research, 2017. 350 p. (In Russ.).
- Mohov A.A. The most vulnerable patients as a category of bioethics and law. Bioetika = Bioethics. 2019;1(23):35–39. (In Russ.) doi: 10.19163/2070-1586-2019-1(23)-35-38.
- Sandakova L.B. Problem of discrimination in the context of neuroethics. Idei i idealy = Ideas and Ideals. 2019;11(1–2):274–295. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17212/2075-0862-2019-11.1.2-274-295.
- Rose N., Abi-Rached J.M. Neuro: The new brain sciences and the management of the mind. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2013. 352 p.
- Meshcheryakova T. V. Medical narrative in bioethics as a criterion for taking into account the individuality of the patient. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta = Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2010;5:66–72. (In Russ.).
- Sokolova E.T. Loss of self: clinic or new cultural norm. Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki = Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. 2014;41(3):191–209. (In Russ.).
- Popova O.V. Protesting I of bioethics and patient. Vestnik RUDN. Filosofiya = RUDN Journal of Philosophy. 2019;23(3):346–355. (In Russ.) doi: 10.22363/2313-2302-2019-23-3-346-355.
- Baum M.L. The neuroethics of biomarkers: What the development of bioprediction means for moral responsibility, justice, and the nature of mental disorder. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2016. 192 p.
- Glannon W. Brain, body, and mind: Neuroethics with a human face. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013. 272 p.
Supplementary files
