Vol 24, No 3 (2024)

Introduction. The relevance of this study is due to the growing influence of the global climate change consequences on the development of countries’ economies and the population’s life quality. Finding an effective response to the climate challenge requires determining the place of the problem of climate change and its consequences among other global challenges and clarifying the significance of climate change for the sustainable development of socio-economic systems. Methods. The study is based on a review of resolutions and reports from a series of United Nations global conferences from 1972 to 2022. To analyze the scientific works on the problem of global climate change, the author used a combination of bibliometric methods, visualization methods and content analysis. Theoretical analysis. A review of intergovernmental documents that reflected the global consensus on development and cooperation in the field of environmental conservation provided insight into the transformation of approaches to solving the problem of global climate change. The evolution of the climate agenda is traced in the context of the sustainable development strategy implementation. Policy priorities are identified for actions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and adapt to the impacts of climate change. Еmpirical analysis. An analysis of the dependence of economic and social damage on the occurrence of natural disasters and weather risks was carried out. The results obtained are considered through the prism of trends characteristic of the time period under study. Conclusions. The relationship between climate, economy, ecology and society is revealed. Through the UN system of sustainable development goals, the place of global climate risks in the system of external challenges and threats to the sustainable development of socioeconomic systems is shown.

Introduction. The relevance of the topic under consideration, on the one hand, is due to external factors, when decisions of a strictly political nature by the Western world leaders and subsequent economic sanctions “cut Russia off ” from a number of important technologies. On the other hand, the lack of a coherent domestic economic policy leads to a mismatch of targets at the national and regional levels. subjects of economic activity, both at the micro and macro levels. In this regard, the development of methodological foundations that allow for the integration of economic entities at the macro level, while qualitatively improving the efficiency of management is extremely important. Theoretical analysis. The article analyzes and evaluates the international experience of technological development management. The main directions of improving management efficiency have been identified. A structural analysis of the subjects of regional management was carried out, which allowed us to identify the main problems. Results. The necessity of using a project approach based on regional technology platforms is substantiated. An organizational model of regional management is presented, which allows for dynamic technological development in strict compliance with all principles of sustainability. Conclusion. Qualitative improvement of management efficiency is possible only on the basis of integration of both different types of management and target indicators of management entities. Such integration should be based on a new industrial policy and represent a permanent process.

Introduction. This article is devoted to the consideration of methodological issues of the influence of technologies and institutions on the processes of technological development and structural modernization of the industrial complex, and also to the development of management tools aimed at supporting the technological development of industry based on the concept of the institutional-technological matrix of industrial policy. Theoretical analysis. It is now recognized that structural changes in industry are one of the main characteristics of a country’s economic growth. At the same time, the main sources of structural transformations in industry are the institutional environment and technological progress. At the present stage of development, the main trend in technological development is the technologies of the IV industrial revolution, including big data, cloud computing, communications and artificial intelligence. These technologies predetermine such a trend of modern industrial development as a transition from the sectoral hierarchy of the industrial complex towards the technological one. Empirical analysis. Taking into account the significant role of the technological factor in industrial modernization, the authors proposed a typology of technologies in complex industrial-technological systems, based on the approach of co-evolution of technologies or the evolution of mutual adaptation of technologies in a complex technological system S. Results. The analysis carried out and the typology of modern technologies developed by the authors made it possible to form a conceptual vision of the institutional-technological matrix of industrial policy, which makes it possible to manage the technological development processes of industry based on taking into account the characteristics of the institutional environment in which a specific production complex operates.

Introduction. The reform of local self-government is an established trend in the activities of the legislative body of the Russian Federation. There is a search for an optimal model of the organization of the system of public authorities at the settlement level. At the same time, the legislation on local self-government provides for institutions that can take on some of the responsibilities for solving issues of local importance. The article deals with the issues of the legal nature of territorial public self-government. The author focuses on the correlation of the concepts of “motivation” and “stimulation”. Results. In the public legal sphere, the state uses various ways to influence participants in public relations in order to encourage them to make positive decisions. To a large extent, these tools are imperative. For example, creation of municipalities throughout the country is imperative; the norm of the Federal Law “On General Principles of the Organization of Local Self-Government in the Russian Federation” regarding the establishment of a system of mandatory local self-government bodies is imperative. However, the law also contains a significant number of dispositive norms. They are characterized by the absence of the obligation of the subjects of the right to perform certain socially significant actions. For example, the law provides for the possibility of establishing a territorial public self-government (TPSG). But residents of settlements have no obligation to create them, therefore, this provision of the law on the possibility of creating TPSG is dispositive, it orients citizens to the establishment of these associations, being, in fact, motivational. Conclusions. Motivational and stimulating components in the system of methods of state influence on public relations are clearly manifested in the establishment and activity of territorial public selfgovernment. The motivational component in influencing public law relations is not the subject of close attention of scientists, although normsgoals, norms-principles increasingly influence the development of priorities for social development, the formulation of relevant legal norms, having only motivation in their arsenal of influence.

Introduction. Throughout the history of Russia, strengthening and protection of state sovereignty has been a priority for the country. One form of this protection is military defence. In order to understand the full extent of this responsibility, it is necessary to examine the constitutional and legal status of servicemen in Russia. This includes general rights, duties, and special powers and restrictions. Additionally, there are benefits and compensation for the unique challenges and responsibilities associated with military service. The current status of servicemen is being reformed in line with the national security strategy and policy to strengthen state sovereignty. The aim of the research is to develop a classification of components of the constitutional and legal position of a serviceperson in the Russian Federation based on a range of theoretical perspectives and practical applications. Theoretical analysis. The position of military personnel and their family members in the Russian Federation falls within a special category. Consequently, this position encompasses a set of universal rights, freedoms, and obligations arising from the general legal status of individuals and enshrined in the Constitution of the Russian Federation. In addition, it includes a list of specific powers, obligations, prohibitions, and restrictions, along with additional safeguards, benefits, and compensations arising from the performance of professional duties and their associated consequences, such as rank, position, service conditions, and other factors. Through the review of theoretical literature, it can be concluded that the list of components of an individual’s legal position is open-ended. The elements of the legal status of servicemen in Russia, as a specific category of individuals, have not been clearly defined. Therefore, there is a need to not only establish these elements, but also to identify criteria for differentiating the status of servicemen based on their mode of service and other relevant factors. Empirical analysis. The author suggests that the legal regulation of servicemen’s status in Russia is linked to the expansion of measures to ensure their fundamental rights and liberties and provide additional benefits and compensation, both for servicemen themselves and their families. This is supported by the constitutional and legal framework, which includes the combination of federal, regional, and local regulations, as well as creation of social guarantees at various levels of government. The main elements of this status include rights, freedoms, obligations, responsibilities, limitations, prohibitions, guarantees, and compensations for servicemen. At the same time, it is not possible to universally implement the elements of the special legal status for servicemen in Russia. It would be advisable to identify certain categories of military personnel and determine the scope of their powers. Results. The elements of the special legal status for servicemen can be broadly categorized into general elements that apply to all servicemen in the Russian Federation; elements related to specific conditions of service, which may vary depending on the type of a military unit, position held, or territorial characteristics of the service; and elements related to performance of duties in conditions of military operations or wartime. Certain elements of the legal status for military personnel in Russia may also apply to their families under certain circumstances, and such elements require special application rules.