Strategy of perioperative


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Central and peripheral regional blockade for surgery are the most suitable, pathogenetically reasonable methods than any other pain relief methods. Advantages of regional blockades are implemented in their extension throughout the required post-operative period. It is proven to reduce the frequency of major complications of the circulatory system, respiratory system, and gastrointestinal tract, as well as mortality rates using prolonged epidural analgesia. Unfortunately, the risk of severe hemorrhagic and infectious complications limits the widespread use of neuraxial blockade, so you should not use them at all patients in a row. The strategy of regional anesthesia is not the expansion of the indications for the central blockades, and in choosing the most appropriate for a particular intervention of regional techniques in order to maximize the realization of its benefits and reduction the risk of complications.

About the authors

Roman V. Garyaev

N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center of MH of RF

Author for correspondence.
Email: romvga@mail.ru

MD, PhD, Senior Researcher of the Department of anesthesiology and resuscitation, N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center of MH of RF

115478, Moscow, Russian Federation

References

  1. Jeffcoach D.R., Sams V.G., Lawson C.M. et al. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs’ impact on nonunion and infection rates in long-bone fractures. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014; 76: 779-83.
  2. Каратеев А.Е., Насонов Е.Л., Яхно Н.Н. и соавт. Клинические рекомендации «Рациональное применение нестероидных противовоспалительных препаратов (НПВП) в клинической практике». Современная ревматология. 2015; 1: 4-23.
  3. Насонов Е.Л. Нестероидные противовоспалительные препараты (Перспективы применения в медицине). М.: Издательство «Анко»; 2000. 143 с.
  4. Horlocker T.T., Wedel D.J., Benzon H. et al. Regional anesthesia in the anticoagulated patient: defining the risks (the second ASRA consensus conference on neuraxial anesthesia and anticoagulation). Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 2003; 28: 172-97.
  5. Moen V., Dahlgren N., Irestedt L. Severe neurological complications after central neuraxial blockades in Sweden 1990-1999. Anesthesiology. 2004; 101: 950-9.
  6. Polomano R.C., Dunwoody C.J., Krenzischek D.A., Rathmell J.P. Perspective on pain management in the 21-st century. J. Perianesth. Nurs. 2008; 23: 4-14.
  7. Cameron C.M., Scott D.A., McDonald W.M., Davies M.J. A review of neuraxial epidural morbidity: experience of more than 8,000 cases at a single teaching hospital. Anesthesiology. 2007; 106: 997-1002.
  8. Christie I.W., McCabe S. Major complications of epidural analgesia after surgery: results of a six-year survey. Anaesthesia. 2007; 62: 335-41.
  9. Counsell D. Complications after perioperative CNB. NAP3. The third national audit project of the royal college of anaesthetists: major complications of central neuraxial block in the United Kingdom. Report and findings. 2009; 101-11.
  10. Neal J., Rathmell J.P. eds. Complications in regional anesthesia and pain medicine. 2nd ed. New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.
  11. Rawal N. Epidural technique for postoperative pain: gold standard no more? Reg. Anesth. Pain Man. 2012; 37: 310-7.
  12. Liu S.S., Wu C.L. Effect of postoperative analgesia on major postoperative complications: a systematic update of the evidence. Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2007; 104: 689-702.
  13. Popping D.M., Elia N., Van Aken H.K., et al. Impact of epidural analgesia on mortality and morbidity after surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Annals of Surgery. 2014; 259: 1056-67.
  14. Wu C.L., Hurley R.W., Anderson G.F. et al. Effect of postoperative epidural analgesia on morbidity and mortality following surgery in medicare patients. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 2004; 29: 525-33.
  15. Wu C.L., Sapirstein A., Herbert R. et al. Effect of postoperative epidural analgesia on morbidity and mortality after lung resection in Medicare patients. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 2006; 18: 515-20.
  16. Wu C.L., Rowlingson A.J., Herbert R. et al. Correlation of postoperative epidural analgesia on morbidity and mortality after colectomy in Medicare patients. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 2006; 18: 594-9.
  17. Mont M.A., Jacobs J.J., Boggio L.N. et al. Preventing venous thromboembolic disease in patients undergoing elective hip and knee arthroplasty. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2011; 19: 768-76.
  18. Wu C.L., Anderson G.F., Herbert R. et al. Effect of postoperative epidural analgesia on morbidity and mortality after total hip replacement surgery in medicare patients. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 2003; 28: 271-8.
  19. Wu C.L., Demeester J.S., Herbert R. et al. Correlation of postoperative epidural analgesia with morbidity and mortality following total knee replacement in Medicare patients. American Journal of Orthopedics. 2008; 37: 524-7.
  20. Neal J.M., Brull R., Chan V.W.S. et al. The ASRA evidence-based medicine assessment of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia and pain medicine. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 2010; 35: S1-S9.
  21. Davis R.G., Myles P.S., Graham J.M. A comparison of the analgesic efficacy and side-effects of paravertebral vs. epidural blockade for thoracotomy - a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trails. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2006; 96: 418-26.
  22. Yeung J.H.Y., Gates S., Naidu B.V. et al. Paravertebral block versus thoracic epidural for patients undergoing thoracotomy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2016; Issue 2. Art. No.: CD009121.
  23. Schreiber K., Chelly J.E., Lang R.S. et al. Epidural versus paravertebral nerve block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing open liver resection: a randomized clinical trial. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 2016; 41: 460-8.
  24. Moawad H.E., Mousa S.A., El-Hefnawy A.S. Single-dose paravertebral blockade versus epidural blockade for pain relief after open renal surgery: A prospective randomized study. Saudi J. Anaesth. 2013; 7: 61-7.
  25. Paleczny J., Zipser P., Pysz M. Paravertebral block for open cholecystectomy [Article in Polish]. Anestezjol. Intens. Ter. 2009; 41: 89-93.
  26. Schnabel A., Reichl S.U., Kranke P. et al. Efficacy and safety of paravertebral blocks in breast surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br. J. Anaesth. 2010; 105: 842-52.
  27. Fodale V., D’Arrigo M.G., Triolo S. Anesthetic techniques and cancer recurrence after surgery. The Scientific World Journal. 2014; Article ID 328513, 10 pages.
  28. Kehlet H., Andersen L.O. Local infiltration analgesia in joint replacement: the evidence and recommendations for clinical practice. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011; 55: 778-84.
  29. Li D., Yang Z., Xie X. Adductor canal block provides better performance after total knee arthroplasty compared with femoral nerve block: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. Orthop. 2016; 40: 925-33.
  30. Гаряев Р.В. Опыт применения ирригационной анальгезии после абдоминальной гистерэктомии. Опухоли женской репродуктивной системы. 2012; 3-4: 139-46.
  31. Liu S.S., Richman J.M., Thirlby R.C., Wu C.L. Efficacy of continuous wound catheters delivering local anesthetic for postoperative analgesia: a quantitative and qualitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2006; 203: 914-32.
  32. Гаряев Р.В. Концепция анальгезии при использовании регионарных методов обезболивания. Регионарная анестезия и лечение острой боли. 2013; 2: 39-47.

Copyright (c) 2016 Eco-Vector


 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies